



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
This essay explores the interplay between youth activism and digital authoritarianism in the Middle East and North Africa, focusing on Egypt and Saudi Arabia. It examines the historical context of digitalization, tracing the evolution of youth activism from the Arab Spring to the present. The essay delves into digital authoritarianism, analyzing how regimes have leveraged technologies to suppress dissent and consolidate power. It investigates the measures taken by the governments to manage digital activism and limit citizens' access to information and freedom of expression online. The research questions aim to understand the sentiments of the youth and the potential for future popular revolts against authoritarian governments. The essay provides a comprehensive analysis of the complex interplay between technology, politics, and social movements in the MENA region, offering insights into the challenges and opportunities faced by young activists in the digital age.
Typology: Essays (high school)
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Vera Colombi ARAM 15.02. TITLE Youth Activism in Response to Digital Authoritarianism in Egypt and Saudi Arabia INTRODUCTION With the advent of the Internet, the Arab World has gone through a revolutionary transformation. In order to pursue more freedom, the Middle East citizens have undergone several phases in the last 30 years, such as fear, need and revolution. This process has begun with the usage of the Internet as a proper tool for politics, which has had a strong impact on both individuals and the state. In this area, youth activism has always been a political phenomenon throughout history, as the youth have frequently stood against injustice and misconduct of power. When the Internet became available for the first time in 1990, the habits of the youth begun to change and, in turn, their consideration of politics too. The Internet access, at the beginning, was limited to a few people, but after a few years, more and more people were starting to use it. During this phase, people were afraid that this modern tool could take away from them their culture and replace it with western customs. When the Internet begun to spread more, and people realised its potential, they begun to use it to gain more power against the state. At this point, the Internet was necessary not only to subvert the state, but also to link people, to find jobs, to enhance people’s skills and to feel connect to the rest of the world. Arabs, more involved in international politics, began to desire a democratic system which lead to sparking protest and revolts all over the Middle East. In 2011, the Arab Spring marked a crucial transformation in the Arab history as an authoritarian President, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, was pushed out for the first time by popular protests. Even though these events had strong repercussion in terms of social- political dynamics, the hoped-outcome after the Arab Spring imagined by millions of citizens has not yet materialized. In Tunisia and partially in Sudan, a semblance of democratic transition has emerged. However, in Egypt and Bahrain, external support bolstered the state, leading to a violent counterrevolution. In three other nations, Syria, Libya, and Yemen, neither a smooth political transition nor an effective government’s response prevailed, resulting in civil strife, state collapse, and widespread turmoil. Hence, the failure of the 2011 uprising has marked a disappointing result in achieving a more solid and just political system. The revolutionary youth stated that the revolution was a failure because it did not consolidate its priorities, demands, needs and principles and was unsuccessful in protecting the civilians
from violence and injustice. However, even though the outcome wasn’t the one expected by the young generation, the Arab Spring produced some changes in the political, social and economic fields. More specifically, in the wake of the revolts, the Middle East has undergone significant changes in democracy, youth employment, displacement, women's empowerment, corruption, and other related areas. This essay will cover most of the arguments mentioned above in the attempt to provide an overview of the historical process that brought to the violent protests in 2011 and what followed. It will go through the historical period from 1990 to 2011 and after the Arab uprisings and it will study what brought young people and students to feel such frustration and dissatisfaction with the state apparatus present in those days. Afterwards, it will explore the correlation between the common desire for human rights and the utility of Internet throughout the process. The main focus will be the concept of digitalisation as a crucial phenomenon that has raised up the population against the oppressors. This new form of political activism has been labeled as “youth activism” and it is linked to the usage of technological tools by the youth. The possibility of being more in contact with the other citizens, the news and the rest of the world empowered students and young people against the power to fight for their rights. The attention then will turn to the consequences of the uprisings in the Middle East in terms of digitalisation and what caused the foundation of the so-called “digital authoritarianism”. There will be an attempt to define this modern form of governance by studying its structure, principles, power management and limits. This essay will narrow down the argument by exploring two study cases: Saudi Arabia and Egypt. It will investigate how digital authoritarianism is shaping these countries and its citizens. Indeed, over the past decade, authoritarian regimes have made significant investments in cyber capabilities to bolster their political longevity and further their geopolitical aims. The increasing adoption of oppressive digital technologies is progressing rapidly, posing significant and hazardous implications for human rights, democratic values, and the emergence of conflicts. RESEARCH QUESTIONS This essay aims to explain two contemporary phenomena, the Youth Activism and the Digital Authoritarianism, which may be found all over the globe but particularly present in the Middle East and North Africa countries. As mentioned above, these two phenomena are strictly related to each others, as one is the consequence of the other and they both are interconnected with the Internet.
political innovation. What pushed the young inhabitants of this region to use the Internet against the oppressive state apparatus? How did the youth activism become a movement? Can the youth activism in the Middle East and North Africa challenge authoritarianism?