Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Unknown Bacteria Lab Report, Lab Reports of Bacteriology

Isolating "Unknown" Bacteria in the Introductory Microbiology Laboratory

Typology: Lab Reports

2020/2021

Uploaded on 05/11/2021

geryle
geryle 🇺🇸

4.5

(23)

277 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
How-To-Do-It
Isolating
"Unknown"
Bacteria
in
the
Introductory
Microbiology
LaboratoryI
A New Selective
Medium
for Gram-Positives
John L.
McKillip MaryAnne Drake
Approximately one week after the
midterm exam in our Introductory
Microbiology lab, the time always
comes to begin the big "unknown"
assignment. This project allows the
students a chance to apply the proce-
dures presented up to this point in
the term, as well as an opportunity
to
practice
their
techniques
and reasoning
when presented with a problem. For
many of the students,
selecting
a broth
tube containing a mixture of three
unknown bacteria,
and implementing
the array of biochemical
and morpho-
logical
tests that allow them to separate
and identify
each,
is a welcome change
from working in small groups, where
perhaps only one or two members
"get their
hands dirty."
These students
enjoy the relative freedom of working
on their own problem, learning from
mistakes they make, and benefitting
from logic and common sense as they
proceed. The assignment also pro-
motes the students' critical thinking
skills.
Having completed the typical bat-
tery of biooxidation and hydrolysis
reactions a few weeks earlier, and
armed with notes on the "how" and
"why" of each of these tests, the stu-
dents are allowed to use a variety of
selective and differential
media to first
isolate each of their three microorgan-
isms. Only after a confirmatory
Gram
stain to verify purity of each isolate
are they allowed to proceed
with their
John L.
McKiIlip,
formerly
at Mississippi
State University,
is currently an Assis-
tant Professor
of Biology at Louisiana
Technical University,
Ruston,
LA
71272;
e-mail: McKillip@latech.edu. Mary-
Anne Drake is an Assistant Professor
of Food Science and Technology at
Mississippi
State University,
Mississippi
State, MS
39762.
biochemical tests and morphological
observations
to make their final deter-
mination as to the identity of each of
the three unknowns to the species
level.
Although theoretically a properly
performed
streak plate should be ade-
quate to isolate a mixture of two, or
even three different bacterial species
on a generic
medium
such as trypticase
soy agar, the students are encouraged
to use selective media (a medium that
allows certain
microorganisms
to grow,
but not others)
to assist them in getting
the Gram-negative
bacteria
away from
the Gram-positives,
and vice versa. For
Gram-negative
isolation,
a good streak
on MacConkey's
agar usually works
nicely, and also allows the student to
observe possible lactose fermentation
by the color of the isolated colonies
(red = positive lactose fermentation)
(Leboffe & Pierce 1995). The high
degree of selectivity makes this a
dependable medium for obtaining
purity of the Gram-negative
microor-
ganisms from a mixed culture. How-
ever, for Gram-positive
isolation, our
regularly used phenylethanol agar
(PEA)
plates were not nearly as effec-
tive. A number of our Gram-negative
lab stocks grew quite well on PEA,
including E. coli. Moreover, some of
our Bacillus spp. were completely
inhibited on this medium,
which made
for some frustrated
students who felt
as if they were wasting valuable time
and resources. Mannitol Salt Agar
(MSA)
works very well for staphylo-
cocci, but is too selective for most
other Gram-positive
bacteria,
such as
Bacillus spp.
Early on, we made the decision to
develop a medium that would select
against as many Gram-negatives as
possible, while still allowing growth
and differentiation
of a wide range of
Gram-positives.
Thus the medium is
not only selective,
but also differential,
based on the utilization of a particular
substrate
in the medium, imparting a
visible color change or distinctive
col-
ony appearance.
We describe in this
paper a medium that we developed
which does this better than any other
we have come across, and one which
has been successfully implemented
in
the Introductory
Microbiology lab to
replace phenylethanol
agar.
Materials
& Components
This selective and differential
medium, which we have termed GP
agar (GP for "Gram-positive")
or GP
broth, is prepared by the recipe in
Table 1.
To prepare, dissolve above compo-
nents in 1 liter of deionized water
while stirring. Add agar last while
over heat, boil gently while stirring,
then remove from
heat, and autoclave.
Analysis
To put this new medium to the test,
we inoculated
it with a wide array
of
bacteria,
most of which we routinely
use in our undergraduate
Microbiol-
ogy laboratory.
Results are scored in
Table 2 as a "+ +" for significant
Table
1. Gram-positive
medium
components,
per liter.
Sodium chloride 32 g
Sodium glycerophosphate 5 g
Lithium chloride 10 g
Phenylethanol 1.5 mL
Mannitol 15 g
Tryptone 10 g
Yeast
extract 10 g
Bromcresol purple 0.02 g
Agar 15 g
610 THE
AMERICAN
BIOLOGY
TEACHER,
VOLUME 61, NO. 8, OCTOBER
1999
Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/61/8/610/49196/4450777.pdf by guest on 24 April 2021
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Unknown Bacteria Lab Report and more Lab Reports Bacteriology in PDF only on Docsity!

How-To-Do-It

Isolating "Unknown"Bacteria in the

IntroductoryMicrobiologyLaboratoryI

A New SelectiveMediumfor Gram-Positives

John L. McKillip MaryAnne Drake

Approximately one week after the midterm exam in our^ Introductory Microbiology lab, the time always comes to begin the big "unknown" assignment. This project allows the students a^ chance^ to^ apply^ the^ proce- dures presented up to this point^ in the term, as well as an opportunityto practicetheirtechniquesand reasoning when presented with a problem. For many of the students, selecting^ a^ broth tube containing a mixture of three unknown bacteria, and implementing the array of biochemicaland^ morpho- logical tests that allow them to separate and identify each, is a welcome change from working in small groups, where perhaps only one^ or^ two^ members "get theirhands dirty."These students enjoy the relative freedom of working on their own problem, learning from mistakes they make, and benefitting from logic^ and^ common^ sense^ as^ they proceed. The assignment also pro- motes the students' critical thinking skills. Having completed the^ typical^ bat- tery of biooxidation and hydrolysis reactions a few weeks earlier, and armed with^ notes^ on^ the^ "how"^ and "why" of each of these tests, the^ stu- dents are allowed to use a variety of selective and differentialmedia to first isolate each of their three microorgan- isms. Only after a confirmatoryGram stain to verify purity of^ each^ isolate are they allowed to proceed with^ their John L.McKiIlip,formerlyat^ Mississippi State University,is currently an Assis- tant Professorof Biology at Louisiana Technical University,Ruston,LA71272; e-mail: McKillip@latech.edu. Mary- Anne Drake is an Assistant Professor of Food Science and Technology at MississippiState University,Mississippi State, MS39762. biochemical tests and morphological observationsto make their final deter- mination as to the^ identity^ of^ each^ of the three unknowns to the species level. Although theoretically a properly performedstreakplate should be ade- quate to isolate a mixture of two, or even three different bacterial species on a genericmedium such as trypticase soy agar, the students are encouraged to use selective media (a medium that allows certainmicroorganismsto grow, but not others)to assist them in getting the Gram-negativebacteriaaway^ from the Gram-positives,and vice versa. For Gram-negativeisolation,a good streak on MacConkey's^ agar^ usually^ works nicely, and also allows the^ student^ to observe possible lactose fermentation by the color of the isolated colonies (red = positive lactose fermentation) (Leboffe & Pierce 1995). The high degree of selectivity makes^ this^ a dependable medium for obtaining purity of the Gram-negativemicroor- ganisms from^ a^ mixed^ culture.^ How- ever, for Gram-positiveisolation, our regularly used phenylethanol agar (PEA)plates were not nearly as effec- tive. A^ number^ of^ our^ Gram-negative lab stocks grew quite well^ on^ PEA, including E. coli. Moreover, some of our Bacillus spp. were completely inhibitedon this medium, which made for some frustratedstudents^ who^ felt as if they were wasting valuable time and resources. Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) works^ very well^ for^ staphylo- cocci, but is too selective for most other Gram-positivebacteria, such as Bacillus spp. Early on, we made the decision to develop a medium that would select against as^ many^ Gram-negatives^ as possible, while^ still^ allowing^ growth and differentiationof^ a^ wide^ range^ of Gram-positives.Thus^ the^ medium^ is not only selective,but also differential, based on the utilizationof a particular substratein the medium, imparting a visible color change^ or^ distinctive^ col- ony appearance.We describe in this paper a medium that we developed which does this better than any other we have come across, and one which has been successfully implemented in the IntroductoryMicrobiology lab to replace phenylethanol agar.

Materials& Components

This selective and differential medium, which we have termed GP agar (GP for "Gram-positive")or GP broth, is prepared by the recipe in Table 1. To prepare, dissolve above compo- nents in 1 liter of deionized water while stirring. Add agar last while over heat, boil gently while stirring, then remove from heat, and autoclave.

Analysis

To put this new medium to the test, we inoculated^ it^ with^ a^ wide^ array^ of bacteria, most of which we routinely use in our undergraduateMicrobiol- ogy laboratory.Results are scored in Table 2 as a "+ +" for significant Table 1. Gram-positivemedium components,per liter. Sodium chloride (^32) g Sodium glycerophosphate 5 g Lithiumchloride 10 g Phenylethanol 1.5 mL Mannitol 15 g Tryptone 10 g Yeast extract 10 g Bromcresolpurple 0.02 g Agar 15 g 610 THEAMERICANBIOLOGYTEACHER,VOLUME61,^ NO.^ 8,^ OCTOBER^1999 Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/61/8/610/49196/4450777.pdf by guest on 24 April 2021

growth as noted after 18 hours of incubation, "+"^ for^ growth^ that^ took 48 hours of incubation, or^ a^ "-"^ for a complete lack of growth following incubation through 96 hours.^ Combi- nations of various Gram-positive/ Gram-negative mixed cultures were also inoculated onto GP^ agar.^ Mannitol fermentation for^ each^ organism^ is^ also noted in^ Table 2.

Conclusions

A number of^ media^ are^ available^ for isolation of various groups of Gram- positive bacteria^ from^ clinical^ samples (Wood 1993) or from^ food^ (vanNetten & Kramer 1992). Many of^ these,^ how- ever, either^ contain^ antibiotics^ as^ the selective agent, or^ are^ very^ enriched in nature, frequently allowing growth from a^ number^ of^ Gram-negative microorganisms along with^ the^ desired Gram-positive species.^ In^ the^ setting of an undergraduate General Microbi- ology laboratory,^ having^ a^ selective medium that allows for the growth of as many Gram-positive bacteria^ as possible while inhibiting growth from Gram-negatives is^ advantageous.^ Our GP agar (or GP broth) has easily allowed for the^ selective^ isolation^ of every Gram-positive^ organism^ that^ we use in our General Microbiology labo- ratory, and^ employs^ the^ pH^ indicator bromcresol purple to differentiate those microorganisms that ferment the sugar mannitol from those which do not. This test is an important one for distinguishing between Staphylococcus aureus, which is positive for mannitol fermentation, from S. epidermidis, which is negative (Kloos & Lambe, Jr. 1991). Mannitol fermentation is also useful for differentiating members of the family Bacillaceae.Lithium^ chloride, phenylethanol, and sodium chloride are included in GP agar to collectively inhibit growth of enteric bacteria and Pseudomonas spp. For these reasons, GP agar would prove useful in an Applied Microbiology lab (and not^ just a General Microbiology lab), such as medical, food, or environmental micro- biology, for isolation and differentia- tion of important Gram-positive spe- cies found^ in^ mixed^ samples. GP agar/broth is inexpensive to for- mulate. All of the individual compo- nents should be readily available in any good bacteriology teaching lab. Moreover, the students appreciate the dependability of the selective agents, and the obvious purple-to-yellow color Table 2. Growth characteristics of selected bacteria inoculated onto GP agar. Incubation Mannitol Organism Temperature Growth Fermentation Escherichiacoli strain B 370C NA' Escherichiacoli strain INVcx' 370C NA Salmonella typhimurium (MSU2) 370C^ -^ NA Salmonella typhimuriumATCC 140283 370C - NA Shigellaflexneri (MSU) 370C NA Shigella sonnei (MSU) 370C - NA Proteus vulgaris (MSU) 370C NA Citrobacterfreundii (MSU) 370C NA Serratia marcescens(MSU) 370C - NA Enterobacteraerogenes (MSU) 370C - NA Enterobactercloacae (MSU) 370C NA PseudomonasaeruginosaATCC 27853 370C NA Staphylococcusaureus ATCC 13565 370C + + + Staphylococcusepidermidis(MSU) 370C + + - Streptococcuspyogenes ATCC 19615 370C + - Leuconostoccremoris (MSU) 300C + - Bifidobacteriumlongum (MSU) 370C + + - Bacillus megateriumstrain B4A 300C + + + Bacillus cereus (WSU4) 300C + Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 300C + Bacillus subtilis strain B6A 300C + + Bacillus licheniformisATCC 14580 300C +^ +^ + Listeria monocytogenesATCC 43256 370C + + 'Not applicable. 2MSU (strain obtained from teaching stocks at Mississippi State University, Department of Biology). 3ATCC (strain obtained from American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD). 4WSU (strain obtained from teaching stocks at Washington State University, Department of Microbiology). change that accompaniesmannitol fer- mentation.Studentresponse to my use of GP agar during unknown assign- ments has been favorable.I have also begun to use this medium in other lab exercises on a regular basis, such as the serial (^) dilution/ pour plate exper- iment, and are making efforts to mod- ify the recipe slightly for more vigor- ous and reproduciblegrowth of lactic acid bacteria.In short,GP agaris supe- rior to phenylethanol agar when stu- dents are performing their primary isolation streaks during the "un- known" assignment, or whenever the occasion should arise to separate Gram-positives from Gram-negatives in a mixed culture. References Kloos, W.E. & Lambe, Jr., D.W. (1991). Staphylococcus. In A. Balows, W.J. Hausler, Jr., K.L. Herrmann, H.D. Isenberg, & H.J. Shodomy (Eds.), Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 5th ed. (pp. 222-237). Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology. LeBoffe, M.J. & Pierce, B.E. (1995). A PhotographicAtlas for the Microbiology Laboratory.San Diego, CA: Morton Publishers. van Netten, P. & Kramer, J.M. (1992). Media for the detection and enumer- ation of Bacillus cereus in foods: A review. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 17, 85-99. Wood, W., Harvey, G., Olson, E.S. & Reid, T.M.S. (1993). Aztreonam selective agar for Gram positive bac- teria. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 46, 769-771.

  • 0 5'

S B

E_

ISOLATINGUNKNOWNBACTERIA 611 Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/61/8/610/49196/4450777.pdf by guest on 24 April 2021