Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Project Management vs. Traditional Firm Organization: A Comparative Analysis, Slides of Project Management

The differences between traditional firm organization and project management in terms of structure, tools, and human aspects. It highlights the unique requirements of project management and the need for a different organization, sharper planning and control tools, and better skills to cope with human problems. The document also covers various forms of firm organization and their suitability for project management, as well as project planning, control, and human aspects.

Typology: Slides

2011/2012

Uploaded on 07/11/2012

devpad
devpad 🇮🇳

4.1

(54)

81 documents

1 / 14

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Traditional Firm Organization
Various Departments
Line and Staff Managers
Appropriate for established operations
Stable inter-department. & inter-personnel
relationships
Not suitable for project management
---why?
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe

Partial preview of the text

Download Project Management vs. Traditional Firm Organization: A Comparative Analysis and more Slides Project Management in PDF only on Docsity!

Traditional Firm Organization

  • Various Departments
  • Line and Staff Managers
  • Appropriate for established operations
  • Stable inter-department. & inter-personnel relationships
  • Not suitable for project management

---why?

Requirements of Project Management

  • Attributes of a Project
    • Project is a non-routine, non-repetitive undertaking often plagued with uncertainties
    • Project relationships are dynamic, temporary and flexible
    • Project requires coordination of inter- department personnel
    • Project requires contribution of external firm/agencies

Forms of Firm Organization

1. Line and Staff organization

  • Conducive to resource efficiency
  • Not effective for project goal realization

2. Divisional organization

  • Separate division to implement the project

3. Matrix organization

  • Staff responsible both to PM & functional Heads
  • Conducive to achieve the twin objectives of PM
  • Greater organizational complexity

Project Planning

Formal and Informal

• Functions of Planning

  • Organizing work and responsibilities
  • A means of coordination among project personnel
  • Induces staff to look ahead
  • Instills a sense of urgency and time consciousness
  • Establishes the basis of monitoring and control

Tools of Project Planning

  • Planning Charts
    • Bar Charts
    • Gantt Charts
    • Multiple Activity Chart
  • Network Techniques
  • Hierarchy of Plans

Project Control

Purposes of Project Control

  • Ensures regular monitoring of performance
  • Motivates personnel to achieve project objectives

Effective Project Control

  • Variance Analysis Approach (old)
    • Backward looking
    • Doesn’t indicate value of work done
  • Performance Analysis (PA) Approach (New)
    • Takes account of value of work done
  • Analytical Framework for PA
    • BCWS Budgeted Cost for Work Scheduled
    • BCWP Budgeted Cost for Work Performed
    • AcCWP Actual Cost for Work Performed
    • BCTW Budgeted Cost for Total Work
    • AdCC Additional Cost for Completion

Effective Project Control …contd

Performance Analysis Indices

  • Cost Variance BCWP – AcCWP
  • Schedule Variance (in cost terms) BCWP – BCWS
  • Cost Performance Index BCWP/ACWP
  • Schedule Performance Index BCWP/BCWS
  • Est. Cost Performance Index BCTW/(AcCWP+AdCC)

Pre-requisites for Effective PM

  • Adequate project formulation
  • Sound project organization
  • Proper implementation planning
  • Advance action
  • Timely availability of funds
  • Judicious equipment tendering and procurement
  • Better contract management
  • Effective monitoring

Causes of In-adequate Project Formulation

  • Superficial and/or unrealistic field investigations
  • Cursory assessment of input requirements
  • Slip-shod methods used for estimating costs/benefits
  • Omission of project linkages
  • Flawed judgments due to lack of expertise
  • Undue hurry to get started
  • Deliberate over-estimation of benefits and under- estimation of costs