


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Time inconsistency is an economic concept where the government's policy rule changes, leading people to make commitments based on an expectation of continuation. The government can benefit society by taking advantage of these commitments. The idea of time inconsistency using the example of an examination and its implications under the expectations-augmented phillips curve.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Time inconsistency refers to the following idea:
From this point of view, an inconsistent policy can benefit society. 1
An example is an examination in a class. The professor announces that there will be an exam next week (the policy rule). The students study to prepare for the exam (the commitment). When the exam date arrives, the professor announces to the class that the exam is cancelled (the change in the policy rule). The exam is unnecessary, because the students have already benefitted from their study. The class can proceed to learn new material, and the professor is thankful not to grade the exams.
2
Macroeconomics Time Inconsistency
A problem is that soon the students anticipate that the exam may be cancelled. They do not study, and they learn nothing.
3
Macroeconomics Time Inconsistency
Important concepts for time inconsistency are rules versus discretion and credibility.
4
Macroeconomics Time Inconsistency
If the professor has discretion to cancel the exam, the likely outcome is that the students will not study and learn: if the students study, the professor will cancel the exam. But the students catch on quickly and stop studying.
Macroeconomics Time Inconsistency
If the professor follows rigidly the rule that the exam will be given, then the students will study and learn. Consequently the rule is better than discretion.
To achieve this end, the professor must have credibility from the students that he will indeed give the exam. If he has the discretion to cancel the exam, then to establish this credibility may be difficult.
7
This reasoning also applies under the expectations-augmented Phillips curve. Assume that the government prefers unemployment below the natural rate, even if it must come at the expense of higher inflation. In this circumstance, then the situation is exactly equivalent to the example of the examination.
8
Macroeconomics Time Inconsistency
If the public has a certain expectation of inflation and the government has the discretion to set policy, then the government will set a more expansionary policy than expected. The economy moves up the Phillips curve: unemployment falls, at the expense of higher inflation.
9
Macroeconomics Time Inconsistency
The public soon catches on and raises its expectation of inflation. The short-run Phillips curve shifts up. In the long run, unemployment is at the natural rate, but inflation is much higher. The overall effect of discretionary policy is negative.
10
Macroeconomics Time Inconsistency
On the other hand, suppose that the government can commit itself to a policy rule. In the long run, unemployment is at the natural rate, but inflation is lower than with discretion.
Macroeconomics Time Inconsistency
Figure 1 is a graphical exposition of these ideas. The closed curves are social indifference curves. The optimum outcome is point A, and the outcome is less preferred for movement away from A, in any direction. The two downward sloping lines are short-run Phillips curves. The higher curve corresponds to higher expected inflation.
Macroeconomics Time Inconsistency
[1] Finn E. Kydland and Edward C. Prescott. Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy , 85(3):473–491, June 1977. HB1J7.