Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Comparing Data Collection Methods: Surveys, Interviews, Focus Groups, and Observations, Exercises of Statistics

An in-depth comparison of four common data collection methods: surveys, interviews, focus groups, and activity observations. Each method is discussed in terms of its pros and cons, including standardization, ease of administration, cost, and ability to gather in-depth information. Students and researchers in fields such as sociology, psychology, and marketing may find this document useful for understanding the strengths and limitations of each method and for selecting the most appropriate method for their research.

Typology: Exercises

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

mdbovary
mdbovary 🇬🇧

4.8

(8)

215 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
The Pros and Cons of Data Collection Methods
Surveys
Pros
Standardization
Easy to do with a large group
Ease of administration
Ability to tap the “unseen”
Suitability to tabulation and statistical
analysis
Sensitivity to subgroup differences
Can be inexpensive
Sample can be used to provide much in-
formation about a population
Can provide an opportunity for many
people to be involved in the decision-
making process
Can be used to record behaviors as well
as opinions, attitudes, beliefs and
attributes
Usefulness enhances if combined with
other methods, i.e., observation or case
study
Cons
Prone to error
Requires a separate data-entry step
More expensive
Possible “interview evaluation” concern
among respondents
Samples must be carefully selected to
ensure statistical meaning.
Subject to misinterpretation, depending
on how questions are designed and asked
Tendency for scope of data to be
limited—omission of underlying
behavior-al patterns
Time-consuming compared with less
formal methods
Interviews
Pros
Allows for clarification
High response rate
Able to gather in-depth information and
to pursue hunches
Can tailor the line of discussion to the
individual
Easier to reach those who are considered
unreachable (the poor, homeless, high
status, mobile, etc.)
May be easier to reach specific
individuals (i.e., community leaders,
etc.)
More personalized approach
Easier to ask open-ended questions, use
probes and pick up on nonverbal cues
Cons
Reactive effect: interviewer’s presence
and characteristics may bias results
Expensive
Requires strong interviewing skills
Slowest method of data collection and
analysis
Responses may be less honest and
thoughtful
Interviewer should go to location of
respondent
Respondents who prefer anonymity may
be inhibited by personal approach
May reach only a smaller sample
Difficult to analyze and quantify results
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Comparing Data Collection Methods: Surveys, Interviews, Focus Groups, and Observations and more Exercises Statistics in PDF only on Docsity!

The Pros and Cons of Data Collection Methods

Surveys

Pros  Standardization  Easy to do with a large group  Ease of administration  Ability to tap the “unseen”  Suitability to tabulation and statistical analysis  Sensitivity to subgroup differences  Can be inexpensive  Sample can be used to provide much in- formation about a population  Can provide an opportunity for many people to be involved in the decision- making process  Can be used to record behaviors as well as opinions, attitudes, beliefs and attributes  Usefulness enhances if combined with other methods, i.e., observation or case study

Cons  Prone to error  Requires a separate data-entry step  More expensive  Possible “interview evaluation” concern among respondents  Samples must be carefully selected to ensure statistical meaning.  Subject to misinterpretation, depending on how questions are designed and asked  Tendency for scope of data to be limited—omission of underlying behavior-al patterns  Time-consuming compared with less formal methods

Interviews

Pros  Allows for clarification  High response rate  Able to gather in-depth information and to pursue hunches  Can tailor the line of discussion to the individual  Easier to reach those who are considered unreachable (the poor, homeless, high status, mobile, etc.)  May be easier to reach specific individuals (i.e., community leaders, etc.)  More personalized approach  Easier to ask open-ended questions, use probes and pick up on nonverbal cues

Cons  Reactive effect: interviewer’s presence and characteristics may bias results  Expensive  Requires strong interviewing skills  Slowest method of data collection and analysis  Responses may be less honest and thoughtful  Interviewer should go to location of respondent  Respondents who prefer anonymity may be inhibited by personal approach  May reach only a smaller sample  Difficult to analyze and quantify results

Focus Groups

Pros  Generate fresh ideas  Allows clarification  Efficiency of getting information from a number of people  Provides immediate sharing and synthesis  Works well with special participants  Less expensive and faster than personal interviews  Personalized approach  Group members stimulate each other

Cons  Moderately time consuming  Moderately expensive  Subject interpretation  High cost per participant  Lack of confidentiality  Respondents who prefer anonymity may be inhibited by personal approach  Input may be unbalanced because some group members dominate  Group members and interviewer can bias responses  Maybe difficult to analyze or quantify data

Activity Observations

Pros  Setting is natural, flexible and unstructured  Evaluator may make his/her identity know or remain anonymous  Evaluator may actively participate or observe passively  Can be combined with a variety of other data collection methods  Generates relevant, quantifiable data  Most useful for studying a “small unit” such as a classroom, Extension Council, etc.

Cons  Requires skilled observer  The evaluator has less control over the situation in a natural environment  Hawthorne effect—if group is aware that they are being observed, resulting behavior may be affected  Observations cannot be generalized to entire population unless a plan for representativeness is developed  If observer chooses to be involved in the activity, he/she may lose objectivity  Not realistic for use with large groups