Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Tall Buildings - Wind Engineering - Lecture Slides, Slides of Environmental Law and Policy

Some concept of Wind Engineering are Aeroelastic Effects, Along-Wind Dynamic Response, Antennas and Open-Frame Structures, Atmospheric Boundary Layers and Turbulence, Atmospheric Boundary, Basic Bluff-Body Aerodynamics. Main points of this lecture are: Tall Buildings, Including Hurricanes, Boundary-Layer, Wind Tunnel, Very Significant, Mode Frequency, Torsional Response, Structural System, Serviceability Response, Peak Accelerations

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 04/25/2013

gurudev
gurudev 🇮🇳

4.6

(10)

102 documents

1 / 29

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Tall buildings
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d

Partial preview of the text

Download Tall Buildings - Wind Engineering - Lecture Slides and more Slides Environmental Law and Policy in PDF only on Docsity!

  • Very wind-sensitive in synoptic winds (including hurricanes)
  • Stimulated development of boundary-layer wind tunnel
  • Usually governed by serviceability response (peak accelerations and deflections in top floors)
  • Cladding pressures can be v. high especially at unusual corners and change of cross section
  • Resonant dynamic response for along- and cross-wind very significant (> 100 metres)

(‘Rule-of-thumb’ first mode frequency : 46/h Hertz (h in metres) )

  • Sometimes torsional response is significant depending on geometry and structural system
  • Commerce Court building, Toronto, Canada - 1970’s

Full-scale and wind-tunnel measurements of local cladding pressures and overall building response (accelerations)

Studies of local pressure peaks and implications for glass design :

Acceleration measurements showed significance of torsional component (twist)

1/200 scale aeroelastic model showed good agreement with full scale

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Time (minutes)

Wind pressure

  • World Trade Center – New York 1973-
  • First buildings to be tested in a turbulent boundary-layer flow wind tunnel (mid 1960’s)
  • Pressure fluctuations on a tall building :

(movie by Shimizu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Pressure fluctuations on a tall building :

(movie by Shimizu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Square cross section - height/width =2.

0.2 0.4 0.

-0.2 -0. -0.4 -0.

1.0 1.2 1.

Cp Cp Cˆp

stagnation point  0.8h

minimum maximum

Windward wall :

mean Cp’s :

Cp Cp Cˆp

  • • Square cross section - height/width =2.
  • -0.6 to -0. - largest minimum Cp : -3. - -0. Side wall (wind from left) : - -0. - -0. - -0.8 -0. - -0.8 -0. - -0. - -0. - -2.4 -2. - - 2. - -2. - -1.8 -2. - -2. - -2. - -2. - -3. - -3. - -3. - -3. - -2. - -2. - -2. - 0. - 0. - 0. - 0.
  • Glass strength under wind loading

Glass strength is dependent on duration of loading :

Microscopic flaws on tension side grow at a rate dependent on local stress

D  s t  dt

T n  (^)  0 ( )

Accumulated damage at constant temperature and humidity

(Brown’s integral) :

s(t) is stress; T is total time over which it acts; n is a high power (15 to 20)

  • Glass strength under wind loading

Under wind loading p(t) : assume s(t) = K[p(t)]m/n^ (nonlinear)

i.e. mth moment of probability density function of Cp

E D K E  p t  dt

T m { }  0 { ( ) }

Cp p p

m E { D } KT ( U ) 0 Cp f ( C ) dC 2 2

1 

  

  • Glass strength under wind loading

Ck is approximately equal to the peak pressure coefficient during the hour of storm winds

Ck = equivalent glass design pressure coefficient - gives pressure which produces same damage in 1 hour of wind loading as that produced by a 1- minute ramp load

 

 

  

  

  

 

  

Cp p p

m p

m

m k C f C dC m

C ρ U ( ) 2

1 K( 3600 ) ( 1 )

ρ U 2

1 K. 60..

2 a

2 a

writing pmax as Ck. (1/2)aU^2 , where Ck is an equivalent glass design pressure coefficient, and equating damage in ramp load test to that in 1 hour (3600 sec.) of wind :

m Cp p p

m Ck m Cp f C dC

1 / 60 ( 1 ) 0 ( )     ^  

  • Glass strength under debris impact

Glazing is vulnerable to damage and failure by roof gravel in the U.S.

ASCE-7 (6.5.9.3) requires glazing above 18.3 m above ground level, and over 9.2m above gravel source, to be protected

Gravel acts like a sphere or cube – will only go up if there is a vertical wind velocity component

  • Overall loading and dynamic response

along wind

Standard deviation of deflections at top of a tall building :

η

1 n b

U ρ

ρ A h

σ

kx

1

h b

a x

x  

  

  

  

 

η

1 n b

U ρ

ρ A h

σ

ky

1

h b

a y

y  

  

  

  

  cross wind

Ax and Ay - depend on building shape

kx - 2 to 2.5 ky - 2.5 to 3.5 (cross-wind)

b - average building density

n 1 - first mode frequency  - critical damping ratio

  • Overall loading and dynamic response

Standard deviation of deflections at top of a tall building :

Circular cross section : 101

5

2

100

5

2

10 - 1

(^52 3 5 7 10 )

X wind

Y

x

cross wind

1000 x deflectionheight

sy h

shx

1