

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Application of four momentum conservation relativistic kinematics and domestic of two body decay of constable particle
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
energy conservation takes on the form
m^21 + p^2 +
m^22 + p^2 = M (14)
Solving this equation for p we get
p =
An immediate consequence of Eq. (14) is that
i.e. a particle can decay only if its mass exceeds the sum of the masses of its decay pro ducts. Conversely, if some particle has a mass that exceeds the masses of two other particles, then this particle is unstable and decays, unless the decay is forbidden by some conservation law, such as conservation of charge or of angular momentum etc. Another p oint to note is that the momenta of the daughter particles and hence also their energies are xed by the masses of the three particles. In the next section we shall see that there is no equivalent statement in the case of three-b o dy decays: the momenta of the daughter particles in three-b o dy decays can take on any value from zero to some maximum, and it is only the maximum momentum that is xed by the masses of the particles. Let us complete our calculation by deriving the formul for the energies of the daughter particles. This is straightforward if we b egin from the energy conservation formula (14) and
express E 2 in terms of E 1 , viz. E 2 =
and similarly
E 2 =
We also note that there is no preferred direction in which the daughter particles travel (the decay is said to b e isotropic), but if the direction of one of the particles is chosen (e.g. by the p ositioning of a detector), then the direction of the second particle is xed by momentum conservation: the daughter particles are traveling back-to-back in the rest frame of the mother particle. Frequently one observes that the masses of the two daughter particles are equal, for instance in the decay of a neutral kaon into a pair of pions. In this case the previous formul simplify: the
energies of the daughter particles are E 1 = E 2 = 12 M and the momenta are p = (^12)
if we denote the common mass of the daughter particles by m. Of interest is also the two-b o dy decay of unstable particles in ight. For instance, high energy b eams of muons or of neutrinos are pro duced in accelerators by letting the internal b eam of protons impinge on a target of metal (thin foils or wires are used in practice) to pro duce pions and kaons, which are then steered in a vacuum tub e in which they decay into muons and neutrinos. Other cases of great interest are the decays of very short-lived reaction pro ducts of high energy collisions, such as, for instance, the decays of B mesons or of D mesons, which are copiously pro duced in mo dern high energy colliders. To illustrate the imp ortance of a prop er discussion of such in- ight decays suce it to say that this is frequently the only way to measure the mass of a neutral particle. Thus we now have the following 4-momenta of the three particles: for the mother particles we write P = (E ; 0 ; 0 ; p), and for the daughter particles we have p 1 = (E 1 ; p~ 1? ; p 1 z ) and p 2 = (E 2 ; p~ 2? ; p 2 z ). This means that we have chosen the z axis along the direction of ight of the mother particle. The immediate result of this is that by momentum conservation the (two- dimensional) transverse momentum vectors are equal in magnitude and opp osite in sign:
The energies and the z comp onents of the particle momenta are related to those in the CMS by a Lorentz b o ost with a b o ost velo city equal to the sp eed of the mother particle. We lab el the kinematical variables in the CMS with asterisks and write the Lorentz transformation of particle 1 in the form of
E 1 = (E 1 + v p 1 z ) p 1 z = (p 1 z + v E 1 ) (20) ~p 1? = ~p 1 ?
and similarly for particle 2. Here v = p=E and = E =M. This completely solves the problem in principle. We can now, for instance, nd the angles which the two daughter particles make with the z axis and with each other as functions of the momentum of the mother particle (Exercise 1). But it is also of interest to approach the problem in a di erent way, without using the Lorentz transformation, starting from energy-momentum conservation:
m^21 + p^21 +
m^22 + p^22 (21) ~p = ~p 1 + ~p 2 (22)
known momentum p 1 and angle 1 b etween ~p 1 and the z axis. Solving for p 1 is a straightforward if lengthy calculation (Exercise 2). In the end we get
p 1 =
2(M 2 + p^2 sin^2 1 )
lower sign must b e rejected since otherwise we would get unphysical negative values of p 1 for 1 > =2. On the other hand, if M p^ =m 1 p < 1, then there is a maximum value of 1 , given by sin 1 max = M p =m 1 p. Now b oth signs must b e kept: for each value of 1 < 1 max there are