
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Selcuk University - Neba Wais Alqorni - Constitutional Law
Typology: Assignments
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Name : Neba Wais Alqorni Student Number : 180613056 (1). Turkey has a quasi-presidential system. The constitution was significantly amended on 27 April 2017 as a result of a referendum (on 16 April 2017) on substantial reforms of the governance system. Previously, the country was governed by the parliamentary system, and through the constitutional amendments, the system of governance has been changed to the current one, effective from 9 July 2018. Given that the legal system is civil law (and not common law), the power of court decisions is limited, and these are not regarded as a main source of law. Accordingly, although prior higher court decisions can guide judges in the decision-making process, they are not binding and can be disregarded when reaching a conclusion in the case at hand. However, the decisions of the Court of Appeal's General Assembly on the Unification of Judgments are binding on judges. This is not a separate appellate body but an assembly of the Court of Appeal which renders decisions regarding points of laws on which its different chambers disagree. (2). The Constitution is the of top ranks in the hierarchy of norms in Turkish Law. Within the competence of Parliament to the Constitution, it is legislated and amended different from law with more difficult procedures. The Constitution of the Republic of Turkey of 1982, in the last sentence of the last paragraph of the article 90, states that “in the case of a conflict between international agreements, duly put into effect, concerning fundamental rights and freedoms and the laws due to differences in provisions on the same matter, the provisions of international agreements shall prevail” (3). Federal is the blended form of government, combining a comprehensive government such as the federal government with provincial governments in a legislative system. Regional is a national doctrine focusing on the advancement of a federal or social arrangement which is based on one or more provinces which regulate financial advantages of a distinct region or the community of regions. Federalism is a political concept in which a group of members are bound together by covenant with a governing representative head. The term "federalism" is also used to describe a system of government in which sovereignty is constitutionally divided between a central governing authority and constituent political units (such as states or provinces). In politics, regionalism is a political ideology that focuses on the interests of a particular region or group of regions, whether traditional or formal (political divisions, administrative divisions, country subdivisions or subnational units). Regionalists aim at increasing their region's influence and political power, either through movements for limited form of autonomy (devolution, states' rights, decentralization) or through stronger measures for a greater degree of autonomy (sovereignty, separatism, independence). Regionalists often favor loose federations or confederations over a unitary state with a strong central government. So the most evident difference between the two is that federal units have more autonomy in governing their affairs (except for external relations and foreign policy which are competences of the federal government) than administrative regions.