Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Occupiers' Liability Acts of 1957 and 1984: Duties, Discharging Duty, and Limitations, Schemes and Mind Maps of Law

An overview of the occupiers' liability acts of 1957 and 1984 in the uk. It covers the definition of 'damage,' 'premises,' and 'occupier,' as well as the duties owed to visitors and non-visitors. The document also discusses the standards of care, discharging duty, and limitations of the occupier's liability. It includes examples and case law to clarify the concepts.

What you will learn

  • What are the limitations of the occupier's liability under the Occupiers' Liability Acts of 1957 and 1984?
  • What is the occupier's duty towards visitors under the Occupiers' Liability Acts of 1957 and 1984?

Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

kataelin
kataelin 🇬🇧

4.7

(9)

221 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
THE OCCUPIERS’ L IABILIT Y ACTS 1957 AND 1984AT A GLANCE 349
11. 6 The Occupiers’ Liability Acts 1957 and
1984at a glance
See Tabl e 11.1.
1957 19 84
Type of
damage (to
claimant)
Propert y damage and pe rsonal
injury (as old common law).
Personal injury only (ss 1(1)(a) and
1(4)). Property da mage excluded (s
1(8)) but may be covered by common
law (Herrington v British Railways
Board [1972]).
‘Premises’ Wide definition: ‘any fixed or
moveable structure’ including
vehicles (s 1(3)).
As 1957 Act (s 1(2)).
‘Occupier’ Person who would have been at
common law (s 1(2); Wheat v Lacon;
Harris v Birkenhead Corporation).
As 1957 Act (s 1(2)(a)).
‘Visitor’ All lawful visitors (s 1(2)) including
invitees, licensees at commo n law
and contractual visitors (s 5).
All non-visitors (usually trespassers)
(s 1(1)(a)).
Also, subject to certain restr ictions,
includes ramblers (exercising a right
under s 2(1) of the Countryside and
Rights of Way Act 2000). However,
it does not cover people using the
highway (s 1(7)) or people using other
public rights of way (s 1A).
Duty Occupier owe s ‘a common duty of
care’ to all visitors simply by virtue of
the fact that they are visitors (s 2(1)).
Occupier only owes a duty (defined in
s 1(4)) if:
(1) aware of danger (or has reasonable
grounds to believe it exists); and
(2) knows (or has reasonable grounds
to believe) a non-visitor is (or may be)
in vicinity of d anger; and
(3) the risk is one in all circumstances
the occupier may be reasonably
expected to protect against (s 1(3)).
Extent of
the duty (or
standard of
care)
A duty to take such ca re that the
visitor is reasonably safe while using
the premises for the purposes for
which they are invited (s 2(2)).
It is the visitor, not premises, who
must be reasonably safe; different
standards of care apply for dif ferent
visitors (s 2(3)).
A duty to ‘take such c are as is
reasonable in a ll the circumsta nces
of the case to see that the [no n-
visitor] does not suf fer injury on the
premises’ (s 1(4)).
TAB LE 11.1 Sum mary of the Occupi ers’ Liability Act s 1957 and 1984
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Occupiers' Liability Acts of 1957 and 1984: Duties, Discharging Duty, and Limitations and more Schemes and Mind Maps Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Type of damage (to claimant)

Property damage and personal injury (as old common law).

Personal injury only (ss 1(1)(a) and 1(4)). Property damage excluded (s 1(8)) but may be covered by common law (Herrington v British Railways Board [1972]).

‘Premises’ Wide definition: ‘any fixed or moveable structure’ including vehicles (s 1(3)).

As 1957 Act (s 1(2)).

‘Occupier’ Person who would have been at common law (s 1(2); Wheat v Lacon; Harris v Birkenhead Corporation).

As 1957 Act (s 1(2)(a)).

‘Visitor’ All lawful visitors (s 1(2)) including invitees, licensees at common law and contractual visitors (s 5).

All non-visitors (usually trespassers) (s 1(1)(a)). Also, subject to certain restrictions, includes ramblers (exercising a right under s 2(1) of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000). However, it does not cover people using the highway (s 1(7)) or people using other public rights of way (s 1A).

Duty Occupier owes ‘a common duty of care’ to all visitors simply by virtue of the fact that they are visitors (s 2(1)).

Occupier only owes a duty (defined in s 1(4)) if: (1) aware of danger (or has reasonable grounds to believe it exists); and (2) knows (or has reasonable grounds to believe) a non-visitor is (or may be) in vicinity of danger; and (3) the risk is one in all circumstances the occupier may be reasonably expected to protect against (s 1(3)).

Extent of the duty (or standard of care)

A duty to take such care that the visitor is reasonably safe while using the premises for the purposes for which they are invited (s 2(2)). It is the visitor, not premises, who must be reasonably safe; different standards of care apply for different visitors (s 2(3)).

A duty to ‘take such care as is reasonable in all the circumstances of the case to see that the [non- visitor] does not suffer injury on the premises’ (s 1(4)).

TABLE 11.1 Summary of the Occupiers’ Liability Acts 1957 and 1984

Discharging duty (or breach)

As ordinary principles of breach (see Chapter 8). The occupier’s duty to ensure that the visitor will be reasonably safe while on their premises, not obligation to ensure safety of visitors (Bowen v National Trust). However, this does not mean that the visitor cannot be expected to take reasonable care for their own safety (s 2(3)). Standard of care may vary depending on the identity and expertise of the visitor, in particular: (1) the standard of care expected will be higher in relation to children, who are ‘less careful than adults’ ((s 2(3) (a)); Jolley); (2) professional visitors can be expected to ‘appreciate and guard against special risks’ (s 2(3)(b); Roles v Nathan [1963]). May be discharged by taking reasonable steps to give warnings must enable visitor to be ‘reasonably safe’ (s 2(4)(a); Darby). Generally there will be no liability for harms caused where independent contractors have done faulty work on the premises as long as occupier has acted reasonably in entrusting the work to them (s 2(4)(b)).

As ordinary principles of breach (see Chapter 8). May be discharged by taking reasonable steps to give: a warning of the danger concerned (s 1(5)) (no requirement of reasonable safety); discouragement to persons from incurring the risk (s 1(5)).

Limitations and defences

Occupier can extend, restrict, modify or exclude their duty (so far as they are free to do so) via a notice or contract (s 2(1) (subject to UCTA, s 2)). Generally no duty in relation to risks ‘willingly accepted as his’ by the visitor (s 2(5)) (Geary v Wetherspoons plc cf White Lion Hotel v James). Contributory negligence (implied by s 2(3) although not mentioned in the statute used by courts).

No express provision—but probably as 1957 Act (s 2(1)). Generally no duty in relation to risks ‘willingly accepted as his’ by the visitor (s 1(6); Ratcliff v McConnell). Contributory negligence (not mentioned in the statute, but used by courts).

TABLE 11.1 Continued