Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Euro Area's Deflation Risk: Implications & Historical Perspective, Study notes of Dynamics

This document from the ECB Monthly Bulletin discusses the risk of deflation in the euro area, examining the nature of inflation developments and the importance of distinguishing between supply-side and demand-side forces. It also explores the historical perspective of deflation and its economic consequences.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

marcyn
marcyn 🇬🇧

4.3

(12)

228 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
65
ECB
Monthly Bulletin
June 2014
Prices
and costs
ECONOMIC
AND MONETARY
DEVELOPMENTS
Box5
RISK OF DEFLATION?
Overall annual HICP inflation in the euro area has declined significantly in recent years,
from 3.0% in November 2011 to 0.5% in May 2014.1 In an environment of subdued economic
growth and weak money and credit creation, this decline has triggered discussions about the
extent to which there is a risk of deflation in the euro area.
In this context, it is important to distinguish between the different definitions of the term
deflation. Taking a very narrow definition, some observers speak of deflation when the annual
rate of inflation has been negative for a period of one quarter. On this basis, the IMF recently
estimated the risk of deflation in the euro area by the end of 2014 to be at about 20%.2 However,
such estimates are highly misleading, as they do not make a distinction between the nature of
shocks driving inflation, or examine the persistency of price dynamics.
In a more meaningful broader perspective, it is preferable to take into account the nature of
the shocks driving down inflation, the wider economic context and the behaviour of inflation
expectations. Indeed, sustained negative rates of inflation are of concern if they create negative
feedback loops with the real economy. For example, prolonged deflation raises the burden for
debt servicing, and the reaction of banks, households and firms potentially creates additional
negative feedback loops between the real economy and the price level.3
In assessing the risk of deflation, it is crucial to identify the nature and persistence of the
determining factors and, in particular, to assess the degree to which inflation developments can
be attributed to supply-side or demand-side forces. The overall price index may turn negative for
a short period on the back of transitory supply-side shocks, such as commodity price movements.
This occurred in the euro area and in other countries, for example, in 2009. However, a period of
negative annual inflation does not in itself imply deflation, in a meaningful economic sense, unless
the price declines become generalised and entrenched in inflation expectations.4 For instance,
if longer-term inflation expectations remain stable, the ebbs and flows in commodity prices are
bound to exert only transitory effects on inflation. Furthermore, it is crucial to disentangle the
impact of supply-side shocks resulting from structural reforms, which may have implications for
inflation developments over the policy-relevant horizon.5 While structural reforms may initially
lead to downward pressures on inflation rates, reflecting also supply-side improvements in the
economy, inflation can be expected to pick up over time as aggregate demand gradually recovers.
1 Based on Eurostat’s flash estimate for May 2014.
2 IMF World Economic Outlook, April 2014, p.15.
3 For more on the debt deflation channel, see the box entitled “Financial stability challenges posed by very low rates of consumer price
inflation”, Financial Stability Review, ECB, May 2014.
4 A similar definition of deflation was presented in “The Monetary Policy of the ECB”, ECB, Frankfurt am Main, 2011.
5 Annual inflation may temporarily turn negative as a result of cost-saving developments on the supply side. Examples include strong
improvements in productivity not matched by proportional increases in wages, tariff cuts or terms of trade changes owing, for instance,
to a fall in oil prices. See also the box entitled “The current period of disinflation in the euro area” Monthly Bulletin, ECB, March 2009.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Euro Area's Deflation Risk: Implications & Historical Perspective and more Study notes Dynamics in PDF only on Docsity!

ECB

Monthly Bulletin

Prices and costs

E C O N O M I C A N D M O N E T A R Y D E V E L O P M E N T S

Box 5

RISK OF DEFLATION?

Overall annual HICP inflation in the euro area has declined significantly in recent years,

from 3.0% in November 2011 to 0.5% in May 2014.

1 In an environment of subdued economic

growth and weak money and credit creation, this decline has triggered discussions about the

extent to which there is a risk of deflation in the euro area.

In this context, it is important to distinguish between the different definitions of the term

deflation. Taking a very narrow definition, some observers speak of deflation when the annual

rate of inflation has been negative for a period of one quarter. On this basis, the IMF recently

estimated the risk of deflation in the euro area by the end of 2014 to be at about 20%.^2 However,

such estimates are highly misleading, as they do not make a distinction between the nature of

shocks driving inflation, or examine the persistency of price dynamics.

In a more meaningful broader perspective, it is preferable to take into account the nature of

the shocks driving down inflation, the wider economic context and the behaviour of inflation

expectations. Indeed, sustained negative rates of inflation are of concern if they create negative

feedback loops with the real economy. For example, prolonged deflation raises the burden for

debt servicing, and the reaction of banks, households and firms potentially creates additional

negative feedback loops between the real economy and the price level.

3

In assessing the risk of deflation, it is crucial to identify the nature and persistence of the

determining factors and, in particular, to assess the degree to which inflation developments can

be attributed to supply-side or demand-side forces. The overall price index may turn negative for

a short period on the back of transitory supply-side shocks, such as commodity price movements.

This occurred in the euro area and in other countries, for example, in 2009. However, a period of

negative annual inflation does not in itself imply deflation, in a meaningful economic sense, unless

the price declines become generalised and entrenched in inflation expectations.

4 For instance,

if longer-term inflation expectations remain stable, the ebbs and flows in commodity prices are

bound to exert only transitory effects on inflation. Furthermore, it is crucial to disentangle the

impact of supply-side shocks resulting from structural reforms, which may have implications for

inflation developments over the policy-relevant horizon.

5 While structural reforms may initially

lead to downward pressures on inflation rates, reflecting also supply-side improvements in the

economy, inflation can be expected to pick up over time as aggregate demand gradually recovers.

1 Based on Eurostat’s flash estimate for May 2014. 2 IMF World Economic Outlook , April 2014, p.15.

3 For more on the debt deflation channel, see the box entitled “Financial stability challenges posed by very low rates of consumer price

inflation”, Financial Stability Review , ECB, May 2014. 4 A similar definition of deflation was presented in “ The Monetary Policy of the ECB ”, ECB, Frankfurt am Main, 2011.

5 Annual inflation may temporarily turn negative as a result of cost-saving developments on the supply side. Examples include strong

improvements in productivity not matched by proportional increases in wages, tariff cuts or terms of trade changes owing, for instance, to a fall in oil prices. See also the box entitled “The current period of disinflation in the euro area” Monthly Bulletin , ECB, March 2009.

ECB

Monthly Bulletin

Empirical criteria, which distinguish outright deflation from subdued price developments of a

less malign nature, would include:

  • a negative annual rate of consumer price inflation over a prolonged period;
  • a negative rate of change in the prices of a broad set of items in the basket of goods and services;
  • longer-term inflation expectations becoming unanchored and falling clearly below levels

consistent with the central bank’s definition of price stability;

  • persistently very low or negative GDP growth rates and/or high and rising unemployment rates.

In the case of the euro area, one should not confuse relative price adjustments with overall

changes in the price level: to speak meaningfully of deflation, the generalised and prolonged fall

in the price level should be broadly based across countries. There is no risk of outright deflation

as long as euro area HICP inflation is in line with price stability. Negative inflation rates in

individual countries may, on occasion, be consistent with the normal functioning of a monetary

union, as they help to restore competitiveness, i.e. they may be symptomatic of supply-side

induced relative price adjustments.

Historical episodes of deflation

The historical perspective supports the notion that deflation should be viewed as a broad-based

and protracted fall in the price level that becomes entrenched in inflation expectations, thereby

reinforcing negative price tendencies.

Since the 1950s, some advanced economies have experienced periods of negative annual

inflation, including Canada, Hong Kong, Israel, Japan, Norway, Switzerland and the United

States. However, these rarely turn into episodes of outright deflation, as many of these periods

were short-lived, with rather benign effects on the real economy. In general, supply-side induced

periods of negative inflation tended to have smaller economic costs, if any, compared with those

that were mainly demand-side induced.

The periods of negative inflation in the United States, Canada and Norway in the late 1940s to

mid-1950s, Israel in 2003 and 2004, and Switzerland in 2009 and end-2011 to mid-2013, can

be seen as qualifying as deflationary only in a narrow technical sense. The decline in prices

was concentrated on a low share of items and had no major impact on GDP growth or, where

data are available, medium to long-term inflation expectations. While in recent years the case

of Switzerland stands out in terms of persistently negative or zero inflation rates, the drivers

of these price developments were due to external factors rather than weak domestic demand.

Indeed, the Swiss economy grew at a robust pace during this period.

There are very few recent cases among advanced economies of outright deflation. The two

most pronounced deflationary episodes since the end of the Second World War have been

Japan (1995-2013) and Hong Kong (1999-2004). In both cases, deflation was prompted by an

unwinding of inflated asset prices. Indeed, following unsustainable debt-financed booms, asset

ECB

Monthly Bulletin

Is there a risk of deflation in the euro area?

The low inflation rates in the euro area are the result of a confluence of both supply and demand-

side factors. Global supply-side factors, including a deceleration in energy and food prices,

have played the most important role. The appreciation in the euro effective exchange rate has

also contributed to the decline in inflation, amplifying the effect of commodity prices. Local

factors, such as the impact of structural reforms in labour and product markets, have contributed

to weakening price pressures as well. At the same time, demand-side factors have weighed on

inflation, particularly in those countries where pre-crisis excesses are still unwinding. However,

at the euro area aggregate level, the current situation does not suggest that an outright deflationary

episode is imminent for the following reasons:

  • the share of items with negative annual growth rates is not exceptionally high compared with

earlier episodes of disinflation (see Chart C);

  • there is no evidence of an unanchoring of medium to long-term inflation expectations. Both

survey and market-based measures – bonds or swap contracts alike – have remained at levels

consistent with the ECB’s inflation objective (see Chart D);^7

  • the latest Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projections for the euro area suggest that, although

price pressures will remain subdued for a prolonged period, HICP inflation is projected to increase

gradually;

  • in addition, economic growth is projected to gradually pick up, while unemployment is

falling slowly from high levels. 8

7 See also the box entitled “Results of the ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters for the second quarter of 2014”, Monthly Bulletin , ECB, May 2014. 8 See the article entitled “Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projections for the euro area”, Monthly Bulletin , June 2014.

Chart C Share of HICP items showing negative annual rate of change

(as a percentage of total items)

Sources: Eurostat and ECB calculations. Notes: Shares of 85 items with annual rates of change below zero (unweighted). The data are monthly and cover the period up to April 2014.

Chart D Long-term inflation expectations and actual inflation in the euro area

(year-on-year percentage changes)

Sources: Consensus Economics, Eurostat and ECB calculations. Notes: The x-axis corresponds to year-on-year actual inflation and the y-axis to six to ten-year-ahead inflation expectations from Consensus Economics. Sample period is April 1999 to April 2014. Semi-annual data.

ECB

Monthly Bulletin

Prices and costs

E C O N O M I C A N D M O N E T A R Y D E V E L O P M E N T S

While significant relative price adjustments are taking place in some euro area countries,

it is highly unlikely that those processes will result in a downward deflationary spiral, as the

competitiveness gains can already be seen as supporting exports.

Conclusion

The term deflation refers to a broad-based and lasting decline in prices, with negative effects on

economic growth. In the euro area context, deflation risks must be analysed for the euro area as

a whole, taking into consideration that, within a monetary union, negative inflation in individual

countries may reflect relative price changes in order to regain competitiveness.

When compared with historical episodes of outright deflation in advanced economies, the risk

of deflation in the euro area appears remote at the current juncture. In particular, there is no

evidence of an emergence of sustained and generalised price declines, and medium to long-term

expectations remain well anchored. In addition, the economic recovery is proceeding in the euro

area, contributing to a gradual absorption of slack. Although the risk of outright deflation in the

euro area can thus be considered to be, at present, remote, too prolonged periods of positive but

low rates of inflation may, under certain circumstances, also be a source of concern requiring an

appropriate policy response.