Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Types of Offences, Punishments, and Landmark Judgements, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Law

This research memorandum provides an overview of offences under the negotiable instruments act, 1881. It answers research questions regarding various types of offences, highest and lowest punishments, most commonly reported offences, and landmark judgements. Sections 138, 143, and 145, discussing dishonor of cheques, evidence of affidavit, and summary trails.

What you will learn

  • Which are the most frequently reported offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act?
  • What are the different types of offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?
  • What are the maximum and minimum punishments for offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act?

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2020/2021

Uploaded on 09/26/2021

kavya-sri-3
kavya-sri-3 🇮🇳

5 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Research Memorandum
Date: 24.06.2021
Re: Overview of offences under the NIA, 1881
Research Questions:
1. What are all the various types of offences punishable under the NIA, 1881?
2. What are the highest and lowest punishments prescribed?
3. What are the most commonly reported offences?
4. What are landmark judgements under the Negotiable Instruments Act?
Research Answers:
1. What are all the various types of offences punishable under the NIA, 1881?
Ans. Dishonor of cheques for insufficiency of funds in the accounts related:
Section 138 When the cheque is dishonored for
insufficiency of funds the one who is at
the defaulter. Such person is deemed to
have committed an offence.
Section 143 Empowers any court while trying an
offence for dishonor of a cheque to direct
the drawer, who is the issuer of the cheque
Section 145 Notwithstanding anything contained in
the of CrPC, the evidence of the
complainant may be given by him on
affidavit and may, subject to all just
exceptions be read in evidence in any
enquiry, trial or other proceeding under
the said Code.
2. What are the highest and lowest punishments prescribed?
Ans. Imprisonment: Under Sections 138 and 143
Lowest For section 143 a term which may extend
to one year.
Highest For section 138 a term which may extend
to two years or with both fine and
imprisonment.
Penalties/fine: Under Section 138 and 143
Lowest For section 143 an amount of fine not
exceeding five thousand rupees.
Highest For section 138 fine which may extend to
twice the amount of the cheque or with
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Types of Offences, Punishments, and Landmark Judgements and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Research Memorandum

Date: 24.06. Re: Overview of offences under the NIA, 1881 Research Questions:

  1. What are all the various types of offences punishable under the NIA, 1881?
  2. What are the highest and lowest punishments prescribed?
  3. What are the most commonly reported offences?
  4. What are landmark judgements under the Negotiable Instruments Act? Research Answers:
  5. What are all the various types of offences punishable under the NIA, 1881? Ans. Dishonor of cheques for insufficiency of funds in the accounts related: Section 138 When the cheque is dishonored for insufficiency of funds the one who is at the defaulter. Such person is deemed to have committed an offence. Section 143 Empowers any court while trying an offence for dishonor of a cheque to direct the drawer, who is the issuer of the cheque

Section 145 Notwithstanding anything contained in

the of CrPC, the evidence of the

complainant may be given by him on

affidavit and may, subject to all just

exceptions be read in evidence in any

enquiry, trial or other proceeding under

the said Code.

  1. What are the highest and lowest punishments prescribed? Ans. Imprisonment: Under Sections 138 and 143 Lowest For section 143 a term which may extend to one year. Highest For section 138 a term which may extend to two years or with both fine and imprisonment. Penalties/fine: Under Section 138 and 143 Lowest For section 143 an amount of fine not exceeding five thousand rupees. Highest For section 138 fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque or with

both fine and imprisonment.

  1. What are the most commonly reported offence? Ans. a. Dishonor of cheques for insufficiency of funds b. Summary trail c. Evidence of Affidavit
  2. What are the landmark judgements under the Negotiable Instruments Act? Ans. a. Dishonor of cheques for insufficiency of funds Electronics Trade & Technology Development Corporation Ltd., Secunderabad Vs. Indian Technologies & Engineers (Electronics) (P) Ltd., and Another (1996) 2 SCC 739. Supreme Court of India Section 138 draws presumption that one commits the offence if he issues the cheque dishonestly. It is seen that once the cheque has been drawn and issued to the payee and the payee has presented the cheque and thereafter, if any instructions are issued to the bank for non-payment and the cheque is returned to the payee with such an endorsement, it amounts to dishonour of cheque and it comes within the meaning of Section 138. Observation: Section 138 affianced to prevent dishonesty on the part of the drawer of negotiable instrument to draw a cheque without sufficient funds in his account maintained by him in a book and induce the payee or holder in due course to act upon it. b. Summary trail Swaminatha Pillai Vs. Mr. A. Senthil Kumar Crl.RC. (MD). No.2 of 2011 Madras High Court Section 143 of the NIA, it may be seen that the decision to avoid the summary of trail procedure and follow that contemplated for summon cases is said to be a conscious one. Such conscious decision may be arrived at either at the commencement of or in the course of a summary trial. Thus, the decision to opt for the procedure prescribed for a summons case must follow the commencement of the case by adopting the summary trial procedure. Observation: