Download Part B State Annual Performance Report for Special Education and more Slides Performance Evaluation in PDF only on Docsity!
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: FAPE in the LRE
Indicator 1: Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma compared to percent of all youth in the State graduating with a regular diploma.
(20 U.S.C. 1416 (a)(3)(A))
Measurement: Measurement for youth with IEPs should be the same measurement as for all youth. Explain calculation.
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 1__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: FAPE in the LRE
Indicator 2: Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of high school compared to the percent of all youth in the State dropping out of high school.
(20 U.S.C. 1416 (a)(3)(A))
Measurement: Measurement for youth with IEPs should be the same measurement as for all youth. Explain calculation.
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 2__
State
Overall Percent = [(b + c + d + e) divided by (a)].
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 4__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: FAPE in the LRE
Indicator 4: Rates of suspension and expulsion:
A. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of children with disabilities for greater than 10 days in a school year; and B. Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race and ethnicity.
(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(A); 1412(a)(22))
Measurement: A. Percent = [(# of districts identified by the State as having significant discrepancies in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of children with disabilities for greater than 10 days in a school year) divided by the (# of districts in the State)] times 100. B. Percent = [(# of districts identified by the State as having significant discrepancies in the rates of suspensions and expulsions for greater than 10 days in a school year of children with disabilities by race ethnicity) divided by the (# of districts in the State)] times 100. Include State’s definition of “significant discrepancy.”
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 5__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: FAPE in the LRE
Indicator 6: Percent of preschool children with IEPs who received special education and related services in settings with typically developing peers (i.e., early childhood settings, home, and part-time early childhood/part-time early childhood special education settings).
(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(A))
Measurement: Percent = [(# of preschool children with IEPs who received special education services in settings with typically developing peers) divided by the (total # of preschool children with IEPs)] times 100.
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 7__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: FAPE in the LRE
Indicator 7: Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improved:
A. Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships); B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy); and C. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.
(20 U.S.C. 1416 (a)(3)(A))
Measurement: A. Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships):
a. Percent of preschool children who did not improve functioning = [(# of preschool children
who did not improve functioning) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
b. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to
functioning comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of preschool children who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
c. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged
peers but did not reach it = [(# of preschool children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
d. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to
same-aged peers = [(# of preschool children who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
e. Percent of preschool children who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-
aged peers = [(# of preschool children who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100. If a + b + c + d + e does not sum to 100%, explain the difference. B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy):
a. Percent of preschool children who did not improve functioning = [(# of preschool children
who did not improve functioning) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
b. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to
functioning comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of preschool children who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
c. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged
peers but did not reach it = [(# of preschool children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 8__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: FAPE in the LRE
Indicator 8: Percent of parents with a child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(A))
Measurement: Percent = [(# of respondent parents who report schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities) divided by the (total # of respondent parents of children with disabilities)] times 100.
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 10__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: Disproportionality
Indicator 9: Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(C))
Measurement: Percent = [(# of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification) divided by the (# of districts in the State)] times 100. Include State’s definition of “disproportionate representation.” Describe how the State determined that disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services was the result of inappropriate identification, e.g., monitoring data, review of policies, practices and procedures under 618(d), etc.
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 11__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision Part B / Child Find
Indicator 11: Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 60 days (or State established timeline).
(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(B))
Measurement: a. # of children for whom parental consent to evaluate was received. b. # determined not eligible whose evaluations were completed within 60 days (or State established timeline). c. # determined eligible whose evaluations were completed within 60 days (or State established timeline). Account for children included in a but not included in b or c. Indicate the range of days beyond the timeline when the evaluation was completed and any reasons for the delays.
Percent = [(b + c) divided by (a)] times 100.
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 13__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision Part B / Effective Transition
Indicator 12: Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(B))
Measurement:
a. # of children who have been served in Part C and referred to Part B for eligibility determination.
b. # of those referred determined to be NOT eligible and whose eligibilities were determined prior to their third birthdays. c. # of those found eligible who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays. d. # of children for whom parent refusal to provide consent caused delays in evaluation or initial services. Account for children included in a but not included in b, c or d. Indicate the range of days beyond the third birthday when eligibility was determined and the IEP developed and the reasons for the delays. Percent = [(c) divided by (a – b – d)] times 100.
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 14__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision Part B / Effective Transition
Indicator 14: Percent of youth who had IEPs, are no longer in secondary school and who have been competitively employed, enrolled in some type of postsecondary school, or both, within one year of leaving high school.
(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(B))
Measurement: Percent = [(# of youth who had IEPs, are no longer in secondary school and who have been competitively employed, enrolled in some type of postsecondary school, or both, within one year of leaving high school) divided by the (# of youth assessed who had IEPs and are no longer in secondary school)] times 100.
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 16__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision Part B / General Supervision
Indicator 15: General supervision system (including monitoring, complaints, hearings, etc.) identifies and corrects noncompliance as soon as possible but in no case later than one year from identification.
(20 U.S.C. 1416 (a)(3)(B))
Measurement: Percent of noncompliance corrected within one year of identification: a. # of findings of noncompliance. b. # of corrections completed as soon as possible but in no case later than one year from identification. Percent = [(b) divided by (a)] times 100. For any noncompliance not corrected within one year of identification, describe what actions, including technical assistance and enforcement actions that the State has taken.
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 17__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision Part B / General Supervision
Indicator 17: Percent of fully adjudicated due process hearing requests that were fully adjudicated within the 45-day timeline or a timeline that is properly extended by the hearing officer at the request of either party.
(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(B))
Measurement: Percent = [(3.2(a) + 3.2(b)) divided by 3.2] times 100.
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 19__
State
Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for __________ (Insert FFY)
Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:
Monitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision Part B / General Supervision
Indicator 18: Percent of hearing requests that went to resolution sessions that were resolved through resolution session settlement agreements.
(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3(B))
Measurement: Percent = (3.1(a) divided by 3.1) times 100.
FFY Measurable and Rigorous Target
(Insert FFY) (Insert Measurable and Rigorous Target.)
Actual Target Data for (Insert FFY) :
Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for (Insert FFY) :
Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets / Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for (Insert FFY) [If applicable]
Part B State Annual Performance Report for (Insert FFY) Page 20__
