

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Instructions for a field examination in econometrics held at the university of california, berkeley in january 2008. The examination covers various topics in econometrics, including simulation methods, estimation of econometric models with measurement errors, and cointegrated systems. Questions with instructions for solving problems related to these topics.
Typology: Exams
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Department of Economics
University of California, Berkeley
January, 2008
Instructions: Answer THREE of the following four questions (one hour each).
the likelihood or moment functions. Let y ( 0
; X; V ) be the data generating function of a dependent
variable Y given the population parameter 0
2 R and conditional on a covariate X. V is a random
variable with a known and easily computable p.d.f. f V
(a) Describe a method for simulating V; stating any additional requirements.
(b) Given an i.i.d. sample f(X i
i )g
n
i=
and the OLS linear Ötted coe¢ cients
n
n
i=
i
n
i
n
i=
i
n
2
n
n
n
n
where
n
n
i=
i
=n and
n
n
i=
i
=n; consider an estimator
n
that solves
n
n
i=
i
n
y
n
i
; v i
n
i=
i
n
2
where fv i g
n
i=
is a set of simulations of V.
i. State su¢ cient conditions for
n
to be a consistent estimator and explain the role of each
condition.
ii. State su¢ cient conditions for
p
n
n
0
to be asymptotically normal.
iii. How could you use ^ n
to improve the e¢ ciency of the estimator?
(c) Suggest an alternative to using the OLS linear Ötted coe¢ cients and motivate your suggestion.
y = g (x
; ) + ";
where x
is an (unobserved) ideal explanatory variable and " is a mean-zero, normally distributed
disturbance that is independent of x
: Suppose one observes
x = x
where is a normally distributed, mean-zero measurement error that is independent of x
: Suppose
one also observes an instrument w that is normally distributed, conditioned on and x
; and is
conditionally independent of with a conditional mean that is a linear increasing function of x
:
Discuss methods for estimating when
(a) g () is linear in x
;
(b) g () is linear in ;
(c) g () is a non-linear function of x
and that is fully determined once is speciÖed; and
(d) g () is a non-linear function that is not fully speciÖed by (the semi-parametric case).
y 1
1
y t = y t 1
t
t 1 ; (t = 2; : : : ; n)
where the " t are i:i:d: N (0; 1) random variables independent of the N
2
random variable :
(a) For what value of!
2
is the process fy t
g stationary?
(b) Explain briezy how the Kalman Ölter can be exploited to simplify the calculation of the exact
likelihood function. (Do not derive the Ölter; just explain how its output can be used.)
(c) Explain brieáy how approximate maximum likelihood estimators of and can be obtained by
nonlinear least squares. What approximations are employed?