



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Understanding of transitions in coordination complexes
Typology: Study notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
ChemWiki: The Dynamic Chemistry E-textbook > Inorganic Chemistry > Crystal Field Theory > Orgel diagrams
Contributor: Prof. Robert J. Lancashire (The Department of Chemistry, University of the West Indies) Orgel diagrams are useful for showing the energy levels of both high spin octahedral and tetrahedral transition metal ions. They ONLY show the spin- allowed transitions. For complexes with D ground terms only one electronic transition is expected and the transition energy corresponds directly to D. Hence, the following high spin configurations are dealt with: d^1 , d^4 , d^6 and d^9. D Orgel diagram On the left hand side d^1 , d^6 tetrahedral and d^4 , d^9 octahedral complexes are covered and on the right hand side d^4 , d^9 tetrahedral and d^1 , d^6 octahedral. For simplicity, the g subscripts required for the octahedral complexes are not shown. For complexes with F ground terms, three electronic transitions are expected and D may not correspond directly to a transition energy. The following configurations are dealt with: d^2 , d^3 , high spin d^7 and d^8. F Orgel diagram On the left hand side, d^2 , d^7 tetrahedral and d^3 , d^8 octahedral complexes are covered and on the right hand side d^3 , d^8 tetrahedral and d^2 and high spin
d^7 octahedral. Again for simplicity, the g subscripts required for the octahedral complexes are not shown. On the left hand side, the first transition corresponds to D, the equation to calculate the second contains expressions with both D and C.I. (the configuration interaction from repulsion of like terms) and the third has expressions which contain D, C.I. and the Racah parameter B. 4 T2g <--- 4 A2g transition energy = D 4 T1g(F) <--- 4 A2g transition energy = 9/5 *D - C.I. 4 T1g(P) <--- 4 A2g transition energy = 6/5 *D + 15B' + C.I. On the right hand side, the first transition can be unambiguously assigned as: (^3) T 2g <---^
1g transition energy = 4/5 *D^ + C.I. But, depending on the size of the ligand field (D) the second transition may be due to: (^3) A 2g <---^
1g transition energy = 9/5 *D^ + C.I. for a weak field or (^3) T 1g(P)^ <---^
1g transition energy = 3/5 *D^ + 15B' + 2 * C.I. for a strong field. TANABE-SUGANO DIAGRAMS An alternative method is to use Tanabe Sugano diagrams, which are able to predict the transition energies for both spin-allowed and spin-forbidden transitions, as well as for both strong field (low spin), and weak field (high spin) complexes. Note however that most textbooks only give Tanabe-Sugano diagrams for octahedral complexes and a separate diagram is required for each configuration. In this method the energy of the electronic states are given on the vertical axis and the ligand field strength increases on the horizontal axis from left to right. Linear lines are found when there are no other terms of the same type and curved lines are found when 2 or more terms are repeated. This is as a result of the "non-crossing rule". The baseline in the Tanabe-Sugano diagram represents the lowest energy or ground term state. EXAMPLE 1: THE d^2 CASE (NOT MANY EXAMPLES DOCUMENTED) The electronic spectrum of the V3+^ ion, where V(III) is doped into alumina (Al 2 O 3 ), shows three major peaks with frequencies of: ν1= cm-1, ν2=25400 cm-1^ and ν3=34500 cm-1. These have been assigned to the following spin-allowed transitions. 3 T2g<---^3 T1g 3 T1g(P)<---^3 T1g 3 A2g<---^3 T1g The ratio between the first two transitions is calculated as ν1ν2 which is equal to 25400 / 17400 = 1.448. To calculate the Racah parameter, B , the position on the horizontal axis where the ratio between the lines representing ν2 and ν1 is equal to 1.448, has to be determined. On the diagram below, this occurs at D/B=30.9. Having found this value, a vertical line is drawn at this position.
1g(P ) <--- 4 A2g From the information given, the ratio n2 / n1 = 24000 / 17000 = 1. Using a Tanabe-Sugano diagram for a d3 system this ratio is found at D/B=24. Figure: Tanabe-Sugano diagram for d^3 octahedral complexes Interpolation of the graph to find the Y-axis values for the spin-allowed transitions gives: n1/B=24. n2/B=33. n3/B=53. Recall that n1=17000 cm-1. Therefore for the first spin-allowed transition, 17000 /B =24.00 from which B can be obtained, B=17000 / 24.00 or B=708. cm-1. This information is then used to calculate D. Since D / B=24.00 then D = B*24.00 = 708.3 * 24.00 = 17000 cm-1. It is observed that the value of Racah parameter B in the complex is 708.3 cm-1, while the value of B in the free Cr3+^ ion is 1030 cm-1. This shows a 31% reduction in the Racah parameter indicating a strong Nephelauxetic effect. The Nephelauxetic Series is as follows: F->H 2 O>urea>NH 3 >en~C 2 O 4 2-^ >NCS-^ >Cl-~CN->Br-^ >S2-^ ~I-. Ionic ligands such as F-give small reduction in B, while covalently bonded ligands such as I-^ give a large reduction in B. NOTE
The original paper by Tanabe and Sugano[10] had the d^5 and d^6 diagrams each missing a T term from excited I states. These diagrams were reproduced in the often quoted text by Figgis[12(a)] and so the errors have been perpetuated. An exception is the text by Purcell and Kotz[15] where the missing T terms have been included, however in their case they have ignored lower lying terms from excited D, F, G and H states which for d^5 are the main transitions seen in the spin forbidden spectra of Mn(II) complexes. A set of qualitative diagrams have been drawn for each configuration (which include the missing T terms) and along with the newest release of "Ligand Field Theory and its applications" by Figgis and Hitchman [12(b)] represent the only examples of Tanabe-Sugano diagrams that provide a comprehensive set of terms for spectral interpretation. REFERENCES