Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

NUISANCE - Lecture - Law - Dr. Sridhar, Lecture notes of Labour Law

Detailed informtion about Nuisance, Winfield, Benjamin v Storr, Private Nuisance, Unreasonable Interference, Environment Law.

Typology: Lecture notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 09/09/2011

rogerpapa
rogerpapa 🇮🇳

4.5

(11)

223 documents

1 / 14

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Nuisance
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe

Partial preview of the text

Download NUISANCE - Lecture - Law - Dr. Sridhar and more Lecture notes Labour Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Nuisance

Winfield

  • (^) Nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over it, or in connection with it. Acts interfering with health, comfort or safety
  • (^) Public Nuisance is common nuisance-crime Section 268 of Indian Penal Code.
  • (^) Private Nuisance is tort

Dr Ram Raj Singh v Babulal

  • (^) Brick grading machine adjoining a clinic of a Doctor. Spl damage of red dust, discomfort and pollution to him & patients
  • (^) Injunction granted.
  • (^) Campbell v Paddington Corpn: 1911. Def built a stand to provide view of Funeral of Edward VII. Pl used to sell chairs from balcony. Entitled to recover damages.

Public and Private

  • (^) Public N is a crime interferes with rights of people in general, while private nuisance is a civil wrong interfering with rights of an individual.
  • (^) Public Nuisance is a Punishable offence, but civil action lies for person who suffered special damage, which is particular and substantial.

Unreasonable Interference

  • (^) Hollywood Silver Fox farm v Emmett. Breading silver foxes, which are extremely sensitive and nervous during breading season. Pl fired a gun as near as possible, foxes killed young ones or miscarriage caused. Injunction and damages granted.
  • (^) Continuous ringing of phone to harass, liable, held in Stockes v Bridges.

Interference with use or

enjoyment or property

  • (^) Injury to the property itself- eg overhanging of branches, right to support of land or buildings, interference with right to light or air (Easements Act s 15, Limitation Act s 25- peaceful enjoyment as of right, without interruption for 20 yrs)
  • (^) Injury to the comfort or health of occupants

Trespass and Nuisance

  • (^) T- is through some material or tangible objects, N can be committed through the medium of intangible objects like vibrations, gas, noise, smell, smoke or electricity.
  • (^) T is actionable per se, N is actionable only on proof of special damage.

Defences

  • (^) Prescriptive Right to Commit a Nuisance, a right to do an act which would otherwise be a private nuisance may be acquired by prescription- easement, if peacefully and openly enjoyed without interruption for 20 years.
  • (^) Statutory Authority: Act done under the authority of a statute.Railways not liable for sparks or deterioration in value of land etc.

Environment Law

  • (^) Out of principle of public nuisance and occupier’s liability, the environmental jurisprudence evolved.
  • (^) Municipal Council, Ratlam v Vardhichand AIR 1980 SC 1622 Magistrate ordered MC to draft a plan within six months to remove nuisance as residents are tormented by stench and stink of open drains and slum under s 133 of CrPC, duty to abate the public nuisance can be enforced Art 38 IPC S 188 and S 123 of Municipalities Act.

Ratlam Municipality case

  • (^) High Court reversed Magistrate’s order but the Supreme Court confirmed it. Broader principles of access to justice under A 38
  • (^) Environment Protection Act 1986 and Absolute Liability Principle along with several judgments in Mehta cases Supreme Court scripted new environment jurisprudence.