



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
This note was prepared for my class of Post graduation. This is about the notion of ideology. It discusses on the ideology and curriculum. Further it tries to talk about Basil Bernstein's theory of pedagogic practice.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Notion of Ideology We often talk about- Gandhism, Marxism, Liberalism, etc., these are what? These are considered as a set of beliefs, attitudes and aspirations, if we see that a person or a social group cherishes or uses to describe their political beliefs. Ideology can be a lens through which a person sees the world, reflects the sum total of the culture, beliefs, assumptions, common sense and expectations people have for themselves or others. It determines how we make sense of things - how we understand one’s own position in the world, their relationships with the world, society as well as their individual purposes, role and path in life. That’s why I mentioned Gandhism, Marxism, etc. Additionally, the lens of ideology makes us to see events and experiences. It also shapes and organise social life and society as a whole. Although it is said that ideology emerges out of prevalent social structures, economic systems of production and political structure, but the social interests expressed therein are hidden, not explicit. It tends to form a closed system and maintains itself in some inconsistencies. However, ideology can be considered as an individual's worldview, but it is in- fact a well-articulated worldview of a group at a particular specific group for the juncture of history. The concept of ideology can be understood from different perspectives. Ideology is false-consciousness as per the thinkers like Marx, Engles. It is a system of distorted and misleading ideas - hides the reality to preserve the interests of the ruling class. For scholars like Adorno, Thompson ideology is a neutral concept - and it is linked to a specific group’s value system or any set of ideas such as liberalism, fascism and behaviourism among others. In this regard Karl Manheim's of sociology of Knowledge helps to understand notion of ideology. As per Manheim, there are modes of thoughts- whatever we think depends on our group experience- the life we lead, the struggles we engage in, the interests we seek to retain and the hopes we cherish. Each social group has its own modes of thinking and these groups are based on economic, racial, caste, gender, ethnic or religious identities. Each social groups’ perspectives can be regarded, per Manheim, as “total ideology” of the group. Total ideology is rooted in concrete socio-historical experiences. For example- The total ideology of upper caste groups might justify the caste system as divinely ordained, while caste groups might view it as a tool of oppression; additionally, in patriarchal societies, the total ideology of men might emphasize male dominance, while women might challenge this ideology by advocating for gender equality. Curriculum and Ideology What do you mean by curriculum? Simply, if we say then, curriculum is a list of contents. Each content has its particular and specific purposes, objectives, models and outcomes. Curriculum is essentially a plan for what students should learn in school, including the content, teaching methods and ways to assess learning. It not only covers a list of contents, but also involves learning goals, classroom management and how to organise lessons. However, what should be taught and how it should be taught is often debated. Different groups like governments, parents, teachers (may be called as stakeholders) have different ideas about what is important (what can be included and what can be excluded). For example, some may think the curriculum should focus on preparing students for secured economy or job, while
others may believe it should preserve local culture or address social issues, like inequalities, gender politics, etc. The curriculum reflects society’s values and goals, but there’s no agreement on what those should be. Questions come to us that what is knowledge and how it is important to teach? Institutions should focus on what? How institutions play a role to preserve traditions or culture or develop new knowledge for change? That’s why the idea of prescribed curriculum is always debatable. From ideological framework curriculum can serve three main purposes: Conservative- preserving traditions and existing structure (e.g., adding contents on classical language Creative- encouraging new ideas, innovation (e.g., teaching students to apply technology in their learning) Critical: encouraging to challenge social norms and addressing issues like race, gender, class, caste (e.g., encouraging students to make arguments or interact with their own opinions) Curriculum is indeed shaped by political and ideological questions about whether society should stay the same or change and what skills and knowledge students need to contribute that process. What curriculum reflects and how? However, each ideology reflects the needs of its time. From a perspective of classical humanist ideology curriculum should focus on preserving traditional values and culture by teaching classic subjects like history, mathematics, and literature. This approach is book-based, exam oriented and teacher has the all control over students. In contrast from the perspective of liberal progressive ideology the curriculum should focus on developing curiosity and creativity rather than authority figures. Modernist perspective ideology urges that a curriculum should focus on the students’ job ready skills. How ideology is related to classroom practice? Knowledge is shared, transmitted in the classroom practice. But questions come- who decide that specific knowledge would be taught and learnt? How it is made as functional? Educational institutions often try to preserve the existing knowledge and knowledge is considered as static, predetermined. Students are considered as blank slates and teachers’ job is to fill this blank slates. Such approach encourages rote learning and memorization, where students are expected to reproduce facts without questioning or understanding them. For example, in a typical exam-oriented system, students might memorize historical dates or mathematical formulas without exploring their significance or real-world applications. This "teacher-controlled passive learning" supports existing power structures and maintains the dominance of certain groups in society. The relationship between curriculum and ideology is evident in who decides what is taught (often those in power) and how it is made functional (through teaching and assessment methods that align with societal goals). For example, a society focused on preserving tradition might prioritize classical subjects and rote learning, while a society focused on innovation and equality might emphasize critical thinking and practical skills. These decisions and methods reflect the values and priorities of the dominant ideology in that society.
Bernstein's most influential contributions include his code theory, which distinguishes between restricted and elaborated codes—forms of language use that reflect and reinforce social class differences. He argued that working-class children often use a restricted code, which is context-dependent and rooted in shared experiences, while middle-class children typically use an elaborated code, which is more explicit and valued in formal education. Beyond language, Bernstein developed a theory of pedagogic discourse and practice, exploring how knowledge is structured, transmitted, and evaluated in schools. He introduced the concepts of classification and framing to explain how different educational structures shape learning experiences and maintain power dynamics. His work remains a crucial reference in understanding how education systems contribute to social reproduction and class-based inequalities. Theory of pedagogic practice Basil Bernstein’s theory of pedagogic practice is about how knowledge is structured and transmitted in schools, and how this is linked to social class and power. He argues that education is not neutral—it reflects and reinforces the power structures of society. Key ideas: Classification and Framing: Classification refers to how subjects are kept separate or integrated. A strongly classified curriculum (like traditional schooling) keeps subjects distinct (e.g., math, science, history). A weakly classified curriculum blurs boundaries between subjects. Framing refers to how much control teachers or students have over learning. Strong framing means teachers control what and how things are taught, while weak framing allows students more freedom. Visible and Invisible Pedagogies: Visible Pedagogy (VP): Explicit rules, structured lessons, and clear expectations. For example, traditional classrooms with strict schedules, textbooks, and exams. This often benefits middle-class students who are familiar with such structures. Invisible Pedagogy (IP): Implicit rules, flexible learning, and student-centered approaches. For example, progressive classrooms where students explore topics at their own pace. While it seems inclusive, it often still advantages middle-class students whose families align with its informal, exploratory style. Bernstein argues that both practices, despite their differences, tend to reproduce social inequalities. For instance: In VP, working-class students may struggle with rigid pacing and sequencing rules. In IP, disadvantaged students may misread the implicit expectations, leading to unequal outcomes. He also highlights conflicts in education, like the debate between knowledge-based education (valuing learning for its own sake) and vocational education (focusing on job skills). Both, he claims, fail to address deeper class inequalities.
Example: In a traditional (VP) classroom, a student from a working-class background might fall behind because they lack the resources to keep up with the fast-paced curriculum. In a progressive (IP) classroom, the same student might struggle because the informal, exploratory style doesn’t align with their home environment, making it harder to understand expectations. Social Class and Education: Schools often favor middle-class ways of thinking and communicating. Working-class students may struggle if their home experiences don’t match the school’s expectations. Even progressive education, which aims to be more inclusive, can still favor middle- class children because it assumes prior exposure to certain ways of learning. Reproduction of Inequality: Schools don’t just teach knowledge; they transmit power and social hierarchies. Different social classes receive different types of education, reinforcing existing inequalities. Bernstein's theory offers a powerful way to understand how education systems reflect and reproduce social inequalities. By focusing on the connections between social class, curriculum, and teaching methods, his work provides insights into why some students succeed while others struggle. However, more research is needed to fully understand how these processes work and how they can be changed to create a more equitable education system.
Sadovnik, A. R. (2001). Basil Bernstein (1924–2000). Prospects, 31 (4), 607-620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF Sadovnik, A. R. (1991). Basil Bernstein’s Theory of Pedagogic Practice: A Structuralist Approach. Sociology of Education , 64 (1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/