



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
In these Lecture Notes, the Lecturer has explained the fundamental concepts of Geochemistry. Some of which are : Natural Composition, Simple, Experimental Studies, Element Partitioning, Melt Composition, Plus Mineral, Partition Coefficients, Experimental, Experimental Studies, Easier
Typology: Study notes
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Lecture 7 A Determination of Partition Coefficients: Discussion of Experimental Approach
sensitivity for TE is limited; hence the TE was added to the system in am
such as 0.1% or more. Such TE contents are commonly well above those found in natural systems, and there is the possibility of non-Henry’s Law behavior if the concentrations exceed the dilute solution limit (see Lecture 2, Figure 3 and Watson, 1985). Most recently, in situ analytical techniques with greater sensitivity for detection of TE are used for analysis of experimental products, e.g., secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) commonly known as an “ion-microprobe”, and laser ablation inductively coupled mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Today there is a very large literature on Experimental Studies of TE Partition Coefficients. I cannot provide a comprehensive listing of references but Appendix 1 is a listing of relevant references. B. Partitioning of manganese behavior forsterite and silicate melt, Watson, E.B., Geochimica Cosmochimica et Acta, 1363-1374, 1977.
For this reaction the equilibrium constant is:
Keq = (a^ MgO^ )^ melt^ (a^ MnSi0.5^ O^2 )solid (a (^) MnO ) (^) melt (a (^) MgSi (^) 0.5 O 2 )solid
where “a” represents activity and a^ MgSi0.5 O 2 is assumed to be one because Mn is
a trace element and the Fo is nearly pure. Therefore:
Keq = (a^ MgO^ )^ melt^ (x^ MnSi0.^5 O^2 )solid^ (γMnSi^ 0.5^ O^2 )solid (x (^) MnO ) (^) melt (γMnO ) (^) melt
and by definition
D Fo / meltMn = (x^ MnSix (^) (MnO0.5O ) (^) melt^2 )solid
so that
D Fo / meltMn = (^) (a (^) MgOKeq ) (^) melt(γMnSi(γMnO )^ melt 0.5O^2 )solid If we assume that (^) (a (^) MgO ) (^) melt is proportional to (^) (x (^) MgO ) (^) melt , we predict that
D Fo / meltMn should vary inversely with the MgO contact of the melt. Indeed Watson’s experimental data show this inverse relation thereby demonstrating a
marked increase in D Fo / meltMn as the MgO contact of the melt decreases from 24 to 6 wt. % (Figure 21).
Figure 21. DMnFo / melt^ versus reciprocal molar MgO in the melt showing that D increases markedly as MgO content of melt decreases.1977. Figure is from Watson,
(d) Note that no temperature dependence is apparent in Figure 21. However, Watson (1977) found that if the Si/O atomic ratio of the melt is plotted vs. ln
D (^) MnFo / melt^ , the partition coefficient increases as Si/O increases but each
temperature defines a distinct trend (Figure 22); therefore the effects on DMnFo / melt of temperature and melt composition are distinguished. Si/O was proposed to reflect the extent of melt polymerization since the completely polymerized melt of
SiO 2 has Si/O = 0.5 and a depolymerized melt consisting only of SiO− 44 units has Si/O = 0.25. An implication resulting from Figure 22 is that over the Si/O range
from 0.25 to 0.30 (typical of basaltic melts), D Fo / meltMn is not sensitive to Si/O
5
Courtesy of Elsevier, Inc., http://www.sciencedirect.com. Used with permission.