
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
System of rights - 4 Questions to the interesting Gypsy Case
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Yes, Art. 53.2 of the Spanish Constitution abolishes the summary and preferential procedure by the ordinary courts, when there is a breach of a fundamental right. Mrs. Maria Luisa Muñoz Diaz also can lodge an individual for protection to protect the right that has been violated (trough the Constitutional Court).
She can claim Art. 14 of the Spanish Constitution – violation of the equality clause. She has been discriminated because she has a Gypsy background. And no one was taking into account that her father was working his hole life and was listed by the social security for over 19 years that he was responsible for his wife and six children. – Section 10.2 of the Spanish Constitution says that Spain must interpret fundamental rights in accordance with the UDHR and other treaties and most of these recognise pricate and family life. Furthermore Art. 16 of the Spanish Constitution allows the freedom of ideology.
Yes, as an recurso de amparo. The reasoning would be no breach of fundamental rights, because Mrs. Muñoz Diaz had many years to register the marriage and she knew that Spain requires the registration of Catholic marriages.
Yes, it could end up before the European Court of Human Rights. As I mentioned, Section 10.2. of the Spanish Constitution says that Spain must interpret fundamental rights in accordance with the UDHR and other treaties and most of these recognise pricate and family life. Even if this is not explicit in the Constitution. Spain is a party of the ECHR and is a member of the council of Europe. Mrs. Muñoz Diaz must fill out an application. The application will be reviewed in order to examine whether there are reasonable grounds. But there is a great emphazis on equality and respecting the right of ideology and family, that this judgement will most likely find that Mrs. Muñoz Diaz is entitled to her widows pension, because she had good faith (family book) and she was married. Furthermore the ECHR will find that Art. 14 of ECHR has been violated by Spanish Authorities.
Sebastian Poppe (17534882) 08.04.