Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

MPCE 014 solved practical file, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Psychology

#Difference between DSM VI AND DSM V # BIG FIVE PERSNALITY TEST # RHACH INKBLOT TEST #NATIONAL MENTAL HEALTH SURVEY OF INDIA #HYPOTHETICAL CASE OF JAI #REFERENCES

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2019/2020

Uploaded on 04/18/2022

sahar-abbas
sahar-abbas 🇮🇳

4.8

(10)

2 documents

1 / 41

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
MAPC 2ND YEAR PRACTICAL
NAME - SAHAR ABBAS
ENROLLMENT NO :-
COURSE CODE :- 014
CONTACT NO:-
EMAIL ID
1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29

Partial preview of the text

Download MPCE 014 solved practical file and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

MAPC 2

ND

YEAR PRACTICAL

NAME - SAHAR ABBAS

ENROLLMENT NO :-

COURSE CODE :- 014

CONTACT NO:-

EMAIL ID

MAPC 2

ND

YEAR PRACTICAL

NAME - SAHAR ABBAS

ENROLLMENT NO :-

COURSE CODE :- 014

CONTACT NO:-

EMAIL ID

STUDY CENTER CODE :- Dept., of mental health life $&skills promotion (01760P

REGINOAL CENTER:- RC – DELHI - 01

DISIPLINE OF PSYCHOLOGY

SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE (SOSS)

INDRA GHANDI NATIONAL OPEN UNOVERSITY

(IGNOU)MAIDAN GARHI Pin Code is 110068.

RORSCHACH INKBLOT TEST

3. DSM-

NATIONAL MENTAL HEALTH SURVEY OF INDIA

5. HYPOTHETICAL CASE OF JAI

6. REFERENCES

PRACTICAL -

BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TEST

AIM / OBJECT: - To Study & understand the five broad personality traits described by the

theory are extraversion (also often spelled extroversion), agreeableness, openness,

conscientiousness, and neuroticism.

INTRODUCTION: - The big five personality traits are the best accepted and commonly

used model of personality in academic psychology. If you take a college course in personality

psychology, this is what you will learn about. The big five come from the statistical study of

responses to personality items. Using a technique called factory analysis researchers can look at

the responses of people to hundreds of personality items and ask the question ‘What is the best

was to summarize an individual?’ This has been through with many samples from everywhere

the planet and therefore the general result's that, while there seem to be unlimited personality

variables, five stands out from the pack in terms of explaining a lot of person’s answers to

questions about their personality:

The five-factor model of personality may be a hierarchical organization of personality traits in

terms of 5 basic dimensions: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and

Openness to Experience. Research using both tongue adjectives and theoretically based

personality questionnaires supports the comprehensiveness of the model and its Applicability

across observers and cultures. This article summarizes the history of the model and its supporting

evidence; discusses conceptions of the character of the factors; and descriptions an agenda for

theorizing about the origins and Operation of the factors. We argue that the model should prove

useful both for Individual assessment and for the elucidation of variety of topics of interest to

personality psychologist.

The Big Five Personality Traits model is based on findings from several independent researchers,

and it dates back to the late 1950s. But the model as we know it now began to take shape in the

1990s.Lewis Goldberg, a researcher at the Oregon Research Institute, is credited with naming the

model "The Big Five." It is now considered to be an accurate and respected personality scale,

which is routinely used by businesses and in psychological research. The Big Five Personality

Traits Model measures five key dimensions of people's personalities.

DESCRIPTION: -

Many contemporary personally psychologist believe that there are five basic dimension of

personality, often referred to as the ‘Big five’ personality traits. The five broad personality traits

described by the theory are extraversion (also often called extroversion), agreeableness,

openness, conscientiousness and neuroticism. Earlier theories of possible traits, including

Gardon Allport’s list of 4000 personality traits Raymond cattel’s 16 personality factors and

Hans Eysenck’s three – factory theory. However many researchers felt that cattell’s theory was

too complicate and Eysenck’s was too limited in scope. As a result, the five – factor theory

emerged to describe the essential traits that serve as the building block of personality. In the

1940s, Raymond Cattell and his colleagues used factor analysis (a statistical method) to narrow

down Allport’s list to sixteen traits. However, numerous psychologists examined Cattell’s list

willing to change and try new things. Individuals typically are willing to take calculated risks.

Those at the other end of the openness category are conventional and find comfort in the

familiar.

MATERIALS REQUIRED

 The test booklet.

 Answer sheet

 Scoring key

 Pencil

 Eraser

 Computer screen & internet.

PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION

The test consists of 50 statements that a participant must rate on, how true they are about

participant in a five scale where I – Disagree, 3 – Neutral and 5 – Agree. Time consuming by

participant mostly 3-8 minute to complete, on the basis of given responses of participant in test,

results will show that participant where fall on a spectrum for each trait.

PREPARATION

All material required for the conduction of test like test booklet, answer sheet, Scoring key,

pencil, eraser, compute and stop watch are ready.

RAPPORT

Rapport is created with the participant and participant is well informing about the details of test.

INSTRUCTIONS

This is a personality test, it will help the participant to understand why participant act the way

that you do and how your personality is structured. Circle the numbers that indicate how much

participant disagree or agree with each statement. Begin each statement with “I”.

SCORE

This report ranks your scores within a range from 'very low' to 'very high'. To enable you to

make a comparison the percentage of people * who normally fall within each range is indicated.

*Normal adult working population. Distribution of scores may differ if comparisons are being

made against other cultural, demographic or specific occupational groups. We will find that we

have described low and high scores for each of the factors and facets. This has proven to be an

effective method of ensuring that people understand the personality trait being measured. People

who score in the 'middle' range will be a differing mixture of both the high and low descriptions -

but less extreme.

PRECAUTION

 Environment of test should be calm, proper and clean.

 Time management should be proper.

 Apparatus should be work properly.

 Participant interest and mood should be good.

 Analysis of test result should be according to true readings.

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION

This table contains a score and also a percentile on the basis of IPIP Big Five Factor Markers.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

FACTOR I – was labeled as EXTROVERSION by the developers of the IPIP – BFFM.

Factor I is sometimes given other names, such as surgency or Positive Emotionality

individual score high on Factor I one are outgoing and social. Individuals who score low

tend to be shut INS.

FACTOR II – is labeled as EMOTIONAL STABILITY. Factor II is often referred to

by other names, such as Neuroticism or Negative Emotionality (in these two cases

interpretations are inverted, as Neuroticism and Negative Emotionality can be thought of

as the opposite of Emotional Stability).

FACTOR III – is labeled as AGREEABLENESS. A person high in agreeableness is

friendly and optimistic. Low scorers are critical and aggressive.

FACTOR IV - is labeled as CONSCIENTIOUSNESS****. Individuals who score this

factor are careful and diligent. Low scores are impulsive and disorganized.

FACTOR V – Is labeled as INTELLECT /IMAGINATION****. This factor is also often

called OPENESS TO EXPERIENCE. People who score low tend to be traditional and

conventional.

END

PRACTICAL 2

RORSCHACH INKBLOT TECNIQUE / TEST

TITLE – RORSCHACH INKBLOT TEST

AIM / OBJECTIVE

To assess the personality structure of the subject by using Rorschach Inkblot Technique.

INTRODUCTION :

Rorschach inkblot technique was developed by Herman Rorschach a Swiss psychiatrist Hermann

Rorschach in 1921 to form a diagnostic investigation of personality. It’s based on projective method

of psychological testing in which a person is catechized to describe what he or she sees in 10

inkblots, of which some are pitch-dark and grayish and others have patches of color. During 1940’s

and 1950’s, the test was synonymous with clinical psychology and goes more popular in the

psychology world. It attained peak vogue in the 1960’s when it was broadly used to impose

cognitive and personality and to diagnosis certain inner conditions. His interest in inkblots

continued into majority. While working in a psychiatric sanatorium, Rorschach noticed that cases

with schizophrenia responded to the spots else from cases with other judgments. He began

wondering if inkblots could be used to create character sketches for different cerebral illnesses.

so, inspired perhaps by both his favorite youth game and his studies of Sigmund Freud’s dream

symbolism, Rorschach developed a methodical approach to using inkblots as an assessment tool.

The Rorschach test has grown to be one of the most popularly used cerebral tests. There are 10

sanctioned inkblots, each got out on separate white cards. Five inkblots are black and grayish; two

are black, grayish, and red; and three are polychromatic without any black.

One of the important specific of this approach is that's shapeless in nature and its stimulates the

subject for free imagination, studies, conscious, unconscious or subconscious. Thus this test known

as “projective test” as is this subject projective his/ her studies, hidden conditions, fantasies, fear,

imagination etc., on the inkblot and note the response.

Inkblot test can be used oppressively depleted cases when all the labs disquisition has failed to

identify any physical or structural abnormality.

that she would be given 10 cards with colored and non-colored inkblots. The subject to look

carefully at it and respond. Whatever comes to her mind regarding the form, shape, colors’ of the

inkblots like. The subject was also told that there’s no such time limit and that she is free to

rotate card is any direction she wants and she is free to look at the card from any prospective she

likes. She was also told not to spend too much time on one card thinking and was asked to finish

as quickly as possible.

PRECAUTION

 Cards were shown in a proper way.

 Environment should be peaceful and conclusive.

 Lighting and sitting arrangement should be comfortable for the subject.

 Confidentiality of the subject’s identity and result should be taken care of.

INTROSPECTIVE REPORT

Initially the subject was resistant about performing the test she had many doubts and queries

regarding the test how to do it, what it would assess etc. All the doubts were cleared. The subject

was ensured about her confidentiality. Subject looked confused and perplexed as to how to

understand it and what to write about it. When she was told how to do it then in late cards she

felt quite confident and at ease. The overall conduction went good.

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION.

Location: - The scoring of the location. There are 3 main location categories:

Whole (W) – W is scored when the whole inkblot area is perceived for the response. Whole is a

whole, even a minute area is not lift out.

Major Details (D) - includes large are of the blot it should be a separate segment by itself over if

the area is smell, it should frequently be chosen to attribute to a response.

Minor Details, (Dd) – it should include smaller area of the blot, it should be an area infrequently

chosen for response. It should be on inner detail of the compact area.

Space (S) – When white space is used or included is location of response along with black or the

original location categories. A space response is not scared separately. It is rather a part of W.D

OR Dd. Thus, a while response with white space of WS, a major detail response with white

space is DS, and so on.

DETERMINANTS

The following alphabets are used is scoring of determinants of response. There are six broad

categories of inkblot determinants you could be responding to:

 F – only form response

 F - good form level response

 F - poor form level response

 C -color response

 C - color dominating form response

 FC - form dominating color response

 Y - black dominating response

 YF - black dominating form response

 FY - form dominating block response

 T - Textile response

 TF - Textile dominating form response

 FT - Form dominating texture response

 V - Vista response

 VF - Vista dominating form response

 FV - form dominating vista response

 M - Human movement response

3. CONTENT CATEGORIES

Content refers to the name or class of objects used in your responses. Some common contents

include:

WHOLE HUMAN (H): A whole human figure.

HUMAN DETAIL (HD): An incomplete human form (e.g., a leg) or a whole form

without a body part (e.g., a person without a head).

HUMAN DETAIL (FICTIONAL OR MYTHOLOGICAL; HD): An incomplete fictional or

mythological human figure (e.g., wings of an angel).

ANIMAL DETAIL- AD: An incomplete animal form (e.g., cat’s head, claw of a crab).

HUMAN EXPERIENCE-(Hx) • Human emotional or sensory experience/description

(i.e., love, hate, sound, smell). Usually also scored special content AB.

WHOLE ANIMAL A • A whole animal form.

WHOLE ANIMAL (A) (fictional • A whole fictional or mythological Or mythological)

animal form (i.e., dragon, unicorn, Disney character).

ANIMAL DETAIL-(AD) (fictional • an incomplete fictional or mythological or

mythological) animal form (i.e., wings of Pegasus, parts of the body of a Disney character).

 M - 0% the subject has not scored on this which means she doesn’t have any inner

aggression.

RESPONSES - The subject has given 20 responses in total which is normal.

However responses are related to productivity subject has normal productivity.

Average Response Time (ART)

ART =

Total Time

2_! No , of response_

40 mints

= 2 min

The average response time is greater than 30- 60 sec. Hence that means the subject was little

slow and she may also be depressed Average response time (chromatic cards)

Total time for chromatic cards

No .of response

= 7 sec / response

Average response time (achromatic cards)

Total time for ACHROMATIC respponse

no. of response

1.25 min

=18.5 sec / response

Thus average response time (7sec) is less for chromatic cards than achromatic cards. This

shows tendency for depression, anxiety and phobias.

Reaction time= Total reaction time on each card / 10

=18.7 sec .

The subject’s average reaction time is 18.7 sec. This lies in the range of 5 – 20 sec. Thus has no

interpretation.

Total reaction time =

Total Time

=18.7 sec

Response time= 30/10 =3 min.

Affective ratio=

total response of cards 8,9,

Total response of cards 17.

Experience Balance =

Total M

C

5 × 1.

Experience Actual = M+C=1+5 = 6

Animal percentage A%=

A + Ad

C

× 100 =

× 100

L =

F

R −

F

F = plus Percentage (f+ %) =

F +

( F )+ ¿ ¿

× 100 =0.6 × 100

= 60%

Content = M-

A -

The ‘A’ on animal content is 35% and therefore denote poor adjustment.

Popular Response – The subject has P popular responses which mean that the subject conforms to the

names of society and is also somewhat creative.

DISCUSSION

The subject is a 33 years old female. She is married and is found to be on normal level of

intellectual functioning.

The Rorschach protocol suggests that the subject’s thought processes and imagination capacity are

low (R.T is high). Here R.20 is normal, however the creativity in her cognitive skill is less (M is

low). Her behavior is entirely governed by her emotion outside (C is high).

Her interpersonal relationship seems to be poor (H and Hd is low). She tends to become hostile to

them (perception of blood, aggressive, animals, sword, etc.).

Her ego strength or reality orientation has declined to significant degree (F + % low) and her

adaptive capacity is low (A% low), her emotional life is uncontrolled (Exp B is low and high) and

Aff, Ratio is high.

END

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual has subsisted modernized seven times since it was first

put out in 1952.

VERSION YEAR NUBMER OF DIAGNOSIS

DSM I 1952 60 disorder

DSM II 1968 193 (APA) removed the diagnosis of “homosexuality” from the

edition.

DSM III 1980 (5 part of multiaxial started).

DSM - III -R 1987 Multiple scaling process

DSM - IV - 1994 297 (a clinically significant behavioral or psychological syndrome

or pattern that occurs in an individual).

DSM – IV - TR 2000 365 (updated version).

DSM – 5 2013 157 disorders.

The newest version of the DSM, the DSM -5, was published in May of 2013. The latest version

was met with considerable discussion and some controversy. A major issue with the DSM has

been around validity. In response to this the national Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

launched the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project to transform diagnosis by incorporating

genetics, imaging, cognitive science, and other levels of information to lay the foundation for a

new classification systems they feel will be more biologically based. DIAGNOSTIC AND

STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS, 4th ed. (DSM-IV) to DSM-5 is

summarized in the report Impact of the DSM-IV to DSM-5 Changes on the National Survey on

Drug Use and Health. This report will supplement that information by providing details

specifically about changes to disorders of childhood and their implications for generating

estimates of child serious emotional disturbance (SED). DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL

MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDER contains descriptions, symptoms, and other criteria as well.

It also contains statistics concerning which gender is most affected by the illness, type of age,

effect of treatment and common treatment approaches.

DSM –IV was originally published in 1994 and listed more than 250 mental disorders. An

updated version, an updated version, called the DSM – IV – TR, was published in 2000. This

version utilized a multiaxial or multidimensional approach for diagnose mental disorder.

The multiaxial approach was intended to help clinicians and psychiatrists make comprehensive

evaluations of a client’s level of functioning, because mental illnesses often impact many

different life areas. The five DSM describe all the “Axes” dimensions to ensure that all factors

Psychological, Biological, and environmental were considered when making a mental health

diagnosis.

PROMINENT CHANGES BETWEEN THE DSM IV AND DSM-

INCLUDE :

 In the DSM-IV, substance use disorder was broken into two separate diagnoses of

substance abuse and substance dependence. In the DSM-5, they combined these two

diagnoses into one, to create a single diagnostic category of substance use disorder.

 The substance use disorder criterions of legal problems from the DSM-IV were dropped

in favor of cravings or a strong desire or urge to use a substance in the DSM-5.

 In addition, three categories of disorder severity were formed, using the number of

patient symptoms. Out of 11 potential symptoms, 2-3 symptoms are diagnosed as a mild

substance use disorder, 4-5 symptoms as moderate, and 6 or more symptoms as a severe

substance use disorder. In the DSM-IV, patients only needed one symptom present to be

diagnosed with substance abuse, while the DSM-5 requires two or more symptoms in

order to be diagnosed with substance use disorder.

 The DSM-5 eliminated the physiological subtype and the diagnosis of polysubstance

dependence.

The DSM – 5 contains a section called “conditions for further study”. This section of book is not

meant to be used to diagnose patients, examples include:

 Persistent complex bereavement disorder.

 Internet gaming disorder

 Non-suicidal self-injury.

DESCRIPTION

The DSM was published in 1952, listing 102 broad categories of disorders. Each of these

included a short list of symptoms, along with some information about suspected causes. The

1968 version contained 100 disorders, and in 1979, the third edition shifted away from

psychoanalytic emphasis, contained over 200 diagnostic categories, and introduced the multi –

axial system (Axis 1 to Axis 5).

 Axis I - Clinical Disorders (including bipolar disorder).

 Axis II - Personality Disorders and Mental Retardation.

 Axis III - General Medical Conditions.

 Axis IV - Psychosocial and Environmental Problems (stressors).

 Axis V - Global Assessment of Functioning.

 DSM – IV was first published in 1994, and a revised edition in 2000, called the DSM –

IV –TR (though the “TR” or text revision, often wasn’t included in articles referencing

the manual). While sticking with the Axis system, this edition broke diagnoses and

symptoms down into section or “decision trees,” including which symptoms must be

included for a diagnosis and which must not be present.

 Diagnostic and statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition, Test Revision.