


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Porter's five-forces model describes strategy as taking actions that create defendable positions in an industry. In general, the strategy can be offensive or ...
Typology: Summaries
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
There are, of course, many specific strategies of each type (offensive or defensive), and identifying which is best depends on the circumstances. But Porter suggests 3 broad or generic strategies for creating a defendable position in the long-run and outperforming competitors.
1) Cost Leadership
Cost leadership is a defendable strategy because: I. It defends the firm against powerful buyers. Buyers can drive price down only to the level of the next most efficient producer. II. It defends against powerful suppliers. Cost leadership provides flexibility to absorb an increase in input costs, whereas competitors may not have this flexibility. III. The factors that lead to cost leadership also provide entry barriers in many instances. Economies of scale require potential rivals to enter the industry with substantial capacity to produce, and this means the cost of entry may be prohibitive to many potential competitors.
Achieving a low cost position usually requires the following resources and skills:
I. Large up-front capital investment in new technology, which hopefully leads to large market share in the long-run, but may lead to losses in the short-run. II. Continued capital investment to maintain cost advantage through economies of scale and market share. III. Process innovation – developing cheaper ways to produce existing products. IV. Intensive monitoring of labor, where workers frequently have an incentive-based pay structure (i.e., a contract which includes some combination of a fixed-wage plus piece-rate pay). V. Tight control of overhead.
2) Differentiation
Differentiation is a defendable strategy for earning above average returns because: I. It insulates a firm from competitive rivalry by creating brand loyalty; it lowers the price elasticity of demand by making customers less sensitive to price changes in your products. II. Uniqueness, almost by definition, creates barriers and reduces substitutes. This leads to higher margins, which reduces the need for a low-cost advantage. III. Higher margins give the firm room to deal with powerful suppliers. IV. Differentiation also mitigates buyer power since buyers now have fewer alternatives.
Achieving a successful strategy of differentiation usually requires the following:
I. Exclusivity, which unfortunately also precludes market share and low cost advantage. II. Strong marketing skills. III. Product innovation as opposed to process innovation. IV. Applied R&D. V. Customer support. VI. Less emphasis on incentive based pay structure.
Risks are: i. Cost differentiation between low cost firms and differentiating firms becomes too large to hold customer loyalty. Buyers trade-off features, service, or image for price. ii. Buyers need for differentiation falls. iii. Imitation decreases perceived differentiation.