Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Bug Hill Site: Uncovering the Past in Jackfork Valley, Study notes of Pathology

Insights into the Bug Hill archaeological site located in the Jackfork Valley. The site is believed to offer unique data on cultural developments and trade practices in the area, as indicated by evidence from Wister Valley midden sites. Excavation strategies employed at the site aim to provide detailed information about the nature of the site and its potential large concentrated rock scatters. The document also discusses the presence of various artifact categories and their associations with specific cultural phases.

What you will learn

  • What was the purpose of the excavation strategies employed at the Bug Hill site?
  • What cultural traditions are represented at the Bug Hill site?
  • What phases and cultural traditions are associated with the artifacts found at the Bug Hill site?
  • What evidence suggests the presence of trade at the Bug Hill site?
  • What types of artifacts have been found at the Bug Hill site?

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

alberteinstein
alberteinstein 🇬🇧

4.8

(9)

227 documents

1 / 244

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
7
-AiO
746
THE
ARCHAEOLOGY
OF
THE BUG
HILL SITE (34PU-ii6):
1/3
PUSHMATAHA COUNTY OKLAHOMA(U) OKLAHOMA
UNIV
NORMAN
ARCHAELOGICAL RESEARCH
AND
MANAGEMENT
CENTER
R
VEHIK
UNCLASSIFIED
82 DACWd5E-78-C-@2i2 F/6
5/6,
N
IEEBEIIBIEEE
IIuuuununuurnn
,mEE-EmmmmmhE-
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a
pf3b
pf3c
pf3d
pf3e
pf3f
pf40
pf41
pf42
pf43
pf44
pf45
pf46
pf47
pf48
pf49
pf4a
pf4b
pf4c
pf4d
pf4e
pf4f
pf50
pf51
pf52
pf53
pf54
pf55
pf56
pf57
pf58
pf59
pf5a
pf5b
pf5c
pf5d
pf5e
pf5f
pf60
pf61
pf62
pf63
pf64

Partial preview of the text

Download Bug Hill Site: Uncovering the Past in Jackfork Valley and more Study notes Pathology in PDF only on Docsity!

7 -AiO 746 THE^ ARCHAEOLOGY^ OF^ THE^ BUG^ HILL^ PUSHMATAHA COUNTY OKLAHOMA(U) OKLAHOMASITE^ (34PU-ii6): UNIV NORMAN^ 1/ ARCHAELOGICAL RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT CENTER R VEHIK UNCLASSIFIED 82 DACWd5E-78-C-@2i2 F/6 5/6, N

IEEBEIIBIEEE

IIuuuununuurnn

,mEE-EmmmmmhE-

ll * , 1 2****. ..--. 4'.: .-

EI~Wi .. M IJ0 _ ".

.0 "^

US" L ""

E- Iflhi= ,- ,

.mROCOPYMICROCOPY' RESOLUTION^ TEST'CHART

- .-. - -*^.^ -.-..

WE

~MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART

NATIONALBUREAUOF STANDRDSAR6S A1963-A~

I~12 11 Lf6M

MR- ROT ""S "

AAW

VIA

,Olr V

";,-.,.''-', ,,IL (^) -,,0,T+. (^) I ,, .. ,., ,.,, ,. ,_ (^) .:. + --.

.. ..,- " .--:". ... ,,,+ -.,- - " 'o .:.,',.+ .,- ,,':. '^ ."::+--+-Z+ .: -; : : +. .-.

reserchseries is an irregular publication of the Archaeological

. ReOearti and Ptmaguuint Center att Uiversity, of uOenaum. Requests for publications Ihoud be addressed to:

Arch&Wtolojical Research land big~ t Cen-ter Univtsty of'Oklahoma 1808 Newton Drive Norman, Oklahoma 730,

1

THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE BUG HILL SITE (34Pu-116):

PUSHMATAHA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA

BY
Rain Vehik

Research Series No. 7

ARCHAEOLOGICe' ?ORCH AND MANAGEMENT CENTER
The University of Oklahoma

THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE BUG HILL SITE (34Pu-116):

PUSHMATAHA (^) COUNTY, OKLAHOMA

Rain Vehik

ABSTRACT

Archaeological investigations were conducted at the Bug Hill (^) site (34Pu-116) as part of the (^) Phase II mitigation program at Clayton Lake

in southeast Oklahoma for the Tulsa District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Contract Number DACW56-78-C-0212. (^) The site will be inundated upon (^) completion of the lake in the Jackfork Valley. The Bug Hill site is one of two large, (^) dark midden mounds discovered during 1979 in the project area. Currently, these sites represent the southernmost distribution of dark midden mounds in eastern Oklahoma. Very similar sites occur along Fourche Maline Creek in (^) Latimer and LeFlore counties.

Investigations at the Bug Hill site consisted (^) of the manual exca- vation of 13 2 m x 2 m, four (^1) m x 1 m squares, and mechanical excava- tion of three backhoe (^) trenches. Preservation of cultural deposits in A the center of the site was extremely good, even (^) though rodent distur- bance and other natural processes affected their (^) distribution in some cases. On the average, these deposits (^) had a depth of 170-180 cm. Toward the edges of (^) the accreti nal mound, the deposits became shallower and preservation was (^) poor.

  • Based on the recovered (^) cultural material and a series of 18 radio- carbon dates, four distinct cultural components are present. (^) The primary activities occurring throughout (^) the prehistoric occupation of the site appear to be (^) the manufacture and maintenance of lithic imple- ments and the acquisition and processing of faunal and floral materials. Even (^) though the basal 50 cm of deposits are undated, the earliest occupation is between 1605 B.C. and 289 B.C. Stratigraphically, (^) this occupation is believed to occur between 60-180 cm. The dates and associated material (^) argue for a Wister phase occupation during the Late Archaic period. Of interest, during this period are the occurrence of marine shell beads and pendants and several flexed burials. A rolled copper bead (^) may also be associated with this period. Several occupational surfaces are (^) defined on the basis of unaligned postmolds and ash/clay (^) concentrations. As a result, the site is believed to have been used as a base camp during the Wister phase.
L ':- S. " ' " "- " : "" , - ".. -"".. .. ""' ."/... .. ',' , ". .-:.=. . :... ' "",;.. .--".,.

The subsequent occupation of^ the^ site^ is^ associatod^ with^ the Fourche Maline phase and dates between A.D. 278 and A.D. 617. This occupation is also believed to represent a base camp with hunting being a primary activity. Similar artifact styles between the^ Wistdr and Fourche Maline phases make it difficult to distinguish them, but the Fourche Maline phase has several small point categories and the first ceramics at the site are noted during this period. One flexed burial, an ash/clay concentration, a rock feature, and a single marine shell pendant and bead in addition to other artifact categories are .. associated with this phase.

A third prehistoric occupation occurring in the upper 20 cm and possibly 30 cm of the site is associated with the early Caddoan period. A radiocarbon determination of A.D. 859 dates this occupation. Beside the date, late varieties of ceramics and small projectile points argue for this placement. Hunting seems to be the primary activity -* and the presence of rock concentrations suggest processing activities. Even though different kinds of activities were^ conducted,^ the^ lack^ of structural features indicates the site was used as a^ special^ purpose camp during this period.

A variety of historic material including ceramics, glass, metal fragments, and bullet casings may relate to a historic (possibly Choctaw) use of the site. These materials were confined to the upper levels of 'the site.

v

v i

 - 6. FAUNAL AND FLORAL REMAINS - Faunal Remains. - Floral Remains. - -Pollen Analysis. 
  • *7. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATIONS - Horizontal and Vertical Distributions........ - Chronology of Site Occupations - Burials
      • ~Lithic Procurement and U l it on
      • *Functional Interpretations. - Site Functions and Nature of Site Significance.....
    • *8. SUMM4ARY AND CONCLUSIONS. - REFERENCES CITED. - APPENDIX. Selected Artifact Measurements

LIST OF TABLES

1. Radiometric dates from archaeological sites at Clayton Lake. 3
2. Physical and chemical properties^ of^ soils^ in^ N28-E12^ and
N50-E29. .. .. ..... ... .. .... ..... ..... 26
3. Summnary of radiocarbon^ dates^ from^ the^ Bug^ Hill^ site

(34Pu-116)... ....... .............^..^ ..

4. Cultural remains (ingrams) from residue sorts of feature
matrices .. .. .. .. ..^. ...^.. ... ........^33
5. Summnary statistics of modified flakes. .. ... .... ....^88
6. Horizontal distribution of modified flakes by lithic type. 89
7. Vertical distribution of modified flakes by lithic type. 90
8. Horizontal and vertical distribution of lithic debitage ... 93
9. Lithic types of debitage larger than 14-inch from N28-E2.^ ..^^94
10. Random sample of debitage^ lithic^ types^ .. .. ... ... ...^95
11. Horizontal and vertical distribution of baked clay by weight
(ingramns). .. ... .. .. ........ ... .. ..... 113
12. Vertical distribution of faunal remains from the 25% random
sample. .. .. ..... .. ... .. .. ... .. ..... 152
13. Vertical distribution of faunal remains from N28-E12^.^.^154
14. Vertical distribution of faunal remains from N28-E2.... 156
15. Habitat preference of modern mammals. .. .. .... ..... 160
16. Vertical distribution of identified mnollusc remains ... 161
11. Vertical distribution of gastropods at the Bug Hill site. 163
18. Horizontal distribution of gastropods at the Bug Hill
site .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. ... .. .. .. .... 164
vii

LIST OF FIGURES

1. Location of the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116). .. .... ...... 6
2. a: Aerial photograph showing the location of the Bug Hill
site (34Pu-116). .. .. .. .... ... .. ... ... 11
b: General site photograph in late fall .. .. ... ..... 11
3. Bug Hill site excavation plan and contour map .. .. ... .. 14
4. Stratlgraphic profile of east backhoe trench. .. .. ..... 18
5. Stratigraphic profiles of north and south backhoe trenches 19
616. a: Stratigraphic profile along east wall of N24-E12 .. 21
b: Stratigraphic profile along east wall of N26-E12. . .. 21
7. Stratigraphic profiles in N30-W8, N1640O, N28-E2, and
N28-WO. .. ... ..... ... .. ... .. .. .. .... 22
8. Stratigraphic profiles in N48-W14, N41-E2, N28-E12, and
N24-ElO .. .. ... .. ... .. .... ... .. ... .. 23
9. Radiocarbon dates from the Bug Hill site in stratigraphic
sequence. .. ... ... .. ... .. .. .. .... .... 29
10. a: Feature 79-3, rock concentration, at a depth of 21 cm
in N16-WO. .. ... ... .. ... .. .. ... ..... 35
b: Feature 79-40, ash/clay concentration, in N26-E12.... 35
11. a: Feature 79-41, ash/clay concentration, in N24-E12.... 41
b: Feature 79-16, Burial 4, in N16-WO .. .. .. ... .... 41
12. a: Feature 79-19, Burial 3, in N28-E14. .. .. .. ... .. 47
b: Feature 79-33, Burial 8, in N24-ElO. .. .. .. ... .. 47
13. a: Cross section of Feature 79-32, Burial 7, in N28-WO.. 51
b: Burial goods associated with Feature 79-32, Burial 7,
in N28-WO. .. .. .. .. .. ..... ... .. ..... 51
14. a: Feature 79-36, Burial 9, in N24-ElO. .. .. .. .. ... 55
b: Feature 79-37, Burial 11, in N26-ElO .. .. .. .. .... 55
ix

15. a-b: Cavity in the left parietal of Burial 9, Feature 79-36 ...... ............................ 59

c: Occlusal maxillary caries in Burial 9, Feature 79-36. (^). 59

d-e: Maxillary abscesses on Burial 9, Feature 79-36.... 59 f: Perforation (^) in right temporal of Burial 9, Feature 79-36 ....... .. (^) .......................... 59

16. Chipped stone implements (^) from the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) 67 17. Chipped stone implements from the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) 71 18. Chipped stone implements from the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) (^) 75 19. Chipped stone implements (^) from the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) 83

  1. Chipped stone implements (^) from the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) 87
  2. Selected ceramic categories and varieties from the Bug Hill

site (34Pu-116) ........ ...................... 101

  1. Selected cermaic categories and varieties from the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) ...... ....................... 23. Selected ground stone implements from the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) ........ ... ..................... 117
  2. Selected ground, pecked (^) stone, and copper implements from the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) ... ................ ... 123 25. Selected bone implements (^) from the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) 127 26. Selected bone implements from (^) the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) 135 27. Selected bone (^) implements from the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116). 141 28. Selected shell implements and historic artifacts (^) from the Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) ...... (^) .................. 149 29. Percentage graph of vertical distribution (^) of gastropods from (^) 34Pu-116 ....... ... .. .. ... .. .. ... 165 30. Distribution (^) of rock concentrations ..... ............ 177 31. Distribution of features in the west part of the site... 178 32. Feature distribution between 50-100 cm in the (^) east part of the site ......... .......................... 180 33. Feature distribution below 100 cm in the east (^) part of the site ............................ 181

x

F (^2)

resources (Neal 1972). Follow-up work, in the form of (^) a testing pro- gram, was (^) done in 1976 when two additional sites were recorded (^) (Bobalik 1977). Another survey, conducted in December (^) 1976-January 1977), re- corded six more sites (^) (Drass 1977: 595-657). The 1976 testing program involved limited test and posthole (^) excavations at 38 sites. Based on this information, five cultural periods (^) (Archaic, Woodland, early Caddoan, late Caddoan, and (^) historic) were posited (Bobalik 1977: 555- 574; 1978). From the information provided by (^) Bobalik (1977: 557-559, Table 281), the Jackfork Valley was most intensively utilized during the Late Archaic, Woodland, and early (^) Caddoan periods. Potential Paleo-Indian and (^) Early Archaic components are indicated primarily (^) by surface materials (Bobalik 1977: 560). However, (^) these remains could also have been utilized by later populations (^) as is indicated at the George C. Davis site (Shafer (^) 1973: 183-185).

The work by Neal (1972) and Bobalik (^) (1977; 1978) does not indicate any ceremonial centers, villages, (^) or small year-round habitation sites in the Jackfork Valley. Two (^) categories of sites were postulated: long- or short-term (^) base camps and special purpose (extraction) (^) camps (Bobalik 1977: 42; 1978: 3-7). Several (^) activities including lithic reduction, (^) hunting, vegetal resource processing, storage, (^) and the processing of undetermined (^) resources were hypothesized (Boballk 1977: (^) 563).

In 1978, (^) the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers initiated Phase (^) I inves- tigations at Clayton (^) Lake. This mitigation program was based on earlier investigations (^) (Bobalik 1977; 1978). The Phase I program concentrated on eight sites and (^) refined the chronological scheme provided by Bobalik (1977). Well dated Woodland (^) components related to the Fourche (^) Maline phase and an early Caddoan hamlet (consisting of two structures) were defined, and several (^) undated Archaic, Woodland, and Caddoan components were excavated (^) (Vehik and Galm 1979). Table 1 provides a listing of radiometric (^) dates obtained during 1978-1979.

The 1979 excavations (Phase II) (^) included work at six sites, three of which (^) were initially excavated in 1978. This work delineated (^) the lack of additional structures at 34Pu-74, (^) but defined a Late Archaic component, (^) confirmed an early Caddoan occupation across the (^) site, and further (^) documented a late Caddoan or protohistoric component. (^) At 34Pu-105, the earliest occupation is a Woodland component (Fourche Maline phase). Subsequent (^) occupation during the early Caddoan period is represented (^) by a structure-like feature. A possible structure (^) is also associated with a Woodland component (^) at 34Pu-111. A later occu- pation of the site during (^) the early Caddoan period is posited on the basis of ceramics, (^) projectile points, and a radiocarbon date (^) which

may be out of context. Two newly excavated sites, 34Pu-100 and 34Pu-102,

have radlometrically (^) dated components. Two C-14 dates at 34Pu- suggest a Woodland component which is overlain by an undated early Caddoan (^) occupation. Finally, at 34Pu-102, a (^) Late Archaic component has been radiocarbon dated. This component (^) is also associated with a multiple burial. An undated Woodland component (^) overlies the Late

5- 00 0 0000 o

0 0 0 >t> 0 0 0 t 0 *> .t u 4.) (^) 14 S-^ S.00^ 0000 0C 0 00 0 00 0 0.^0 .C^4^00 41 1 w w wW2C C 3C M 3C C 3C 3C 3C S. -

C r 0 0 0 00%u ~e

40 4.0 1 1 1 1 14 4 4

CC (^0) t rC

41.5 4J MN r 4 0 W L %W V n W D#%O

0 (

L1 4.o - 91 V-4".) n cn m *~ ~ to 5- .' 0 S0. 40 ~ mc. f _ut 10 m 01 00 ON0 % C Oa l

  1. a). W. W^ ..^ P%^.^ 1.^. *41 *4 4) 44E

U 0 U~% U C U-3= U Z4 4 J 4 J c- X 444 4- f4 1p. J W 4 J J4 (^) !C Gc 41J

4U (^) V4U ~ 4U (^) W4U IAV WL.L. .4) U)a A U.U (^) L 4.) A 04 (^) L L).' 4) (^) 4J 0a (^) 4J 04(n (^). W 4.) 000 4JV) 4J(A4J u

I I 1flf 1f0JJ 45- W

.L0C .CLaam Q~.C LC L0.0. 00. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.0.020.0CL 00g

41

41^ co4^ o^ V4M^ n^ r'.-~^ 4qC m*^ c^ e^ q^4^00

Coco= 1flc

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

THE SITE

The Bug Hill site (34Pu-116) was located during the summer of 1979 and excavations were started in August and completed by the beginning of December. The site is approximately 150 m west of Jackfork Creek and 400 m northeast of the confluence of Jackfork and North Jackfork creeks (Figure (^) 1). An intermittent stream is adjacent to the west side (^) of the site, and numerous intermittent creeks are to the north. The Wheeler^ Lee^ site^ (34Pu-102)^ is^ approximately^^800 m^ east^ of^ 34Pu-116. The Dink site (34Pu-114), which is similar in composition to the Bug Hill site, is approximately 2200 m west-southwest at the confluence of Jackfork and Maxwell creeks (Figure 1).

There is little (^) evidence of similar sites (dark midden mounds) other than (^) the Dink site in the project area. Recently, a third possible dark midden mound was reported (^) to the Corps of Engineers. This site is east of the Bug Hill site. These sites occur in an area where Wolf, Middle, and Flagpole mountains converge to form a narrow valley, and may (^) be situated in this area because prehistoric populations could easily exploit a variety of (^) ecological zones. Another possible reason for their placement at the narrow end of Jackfork Valley is that the mountains may form a natural defense barrier. There is strong evidence from similar sites along the Fourche Maline Creek in the Wister Lake vicinity of warfare and/or violence (Powell and Rogers 1980; Galm 1978a). Human burials with projectile points (^) either im- planted in bone or in the chest cavity have been reported from these sites.

The Bug Hill site is composed of very dark, (^) homogeneous soils. Itmeasures 56 m x 60mand is at least 1.8 (^) m deep in the east-central part of the site. The site was (^) cultivated in the 1940's or 1950's and the plowzone has an average depth of 20 cm. The plowzone may cover the entire site and sheet erosion and btoturbation has caused it to spread out from the edges of the site. There (^) is also evidence of in- tensive rodent burrowing, and the site was overgrown with dense (^) brush, briars, and medium to large oak trees.

,. q,.. : ' .. '. '. " .'. :.... /.****. :. :. -

34u16 OAIN (^) A HWN IE

Figure~~~~~~(I. 1.Lctino4teBgilsie(4P-1)

-bI