




Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A scientific paper published in the British Journal of Anaesthesia in 1996, which discusses the mechanisms of cell injury and death. The authors explain that cell death is a necessary process for maintaining organ integrity and physiological homeostasis, and review the processes of cell injury, adaptation, and the roles of cell injury and death in organ dysfunction. They also discuss the morphological classification of cell death and the implications for prevention and therapy of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).
Typology: Study notes
1 / 8
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
British Journal of Anaesthesia 1996; 77 : 3–
Control of the rate of cell death relative to the rate of cell division maintains organ integrity and physio- logical homeostasis. Cell death is valuable for the organism because it removes terminally injured or unwanted cells that utilize valuable substrates and nutrients. Likewise, cell death also has value for the species, as it provides a mechanism for eliminating terminally injured individuals who consume necess- ary societal resources or harbour toxic pathogens. Recent advances in cellular biology have contributed substantially to our understanding of the processes of cell injury and death, and have provided the molecular tools necessary to control it. This paper reviews cell injury and adaptation; mechanisms of cell death; the roles of cell injury and death in the pathophysiology of organ dysfunction; and implica- tions for prevention and therapy of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).
Cell injury occurs as a result of physical, chemical or biological insults or as a result of vital substrate deficiency (table 1). The cellular response to these injuries is adaptive, designed to restore homeostasis and protect the cell from further injury. Although characteristic changes in gene transcription occur, it is not the relative amount but the pattern of transcription that changes, with emphasis directed towards transcription of “vital” genes. The responses induced by cellular injury fall into four main patterns: the ischaemic/anoxic, oxidative, heat shock and acute phase responses. These are reviewed briefly below.
Because of the unusual high efficiency of the cardiopulmonary system to transport oxygen, cells in higher animals have not developed elaborate cellular pathways to adapt to hypoxia and are thus relatively sensitive to ischaemia [13, 18]. As a consequence, lack of oxygen dramatically increases the need for anaerobic glycolysis to maintain intracellular ATP
( Br. J. Anaesth. 1996; 77 : 3ñ10)
Key words Cells, apoptosis. Cells, necrosis. Cells, death. Complications, sepsis.
reserves. The associated changes in gene expression include decreased total protein synthesis, induction of hypoxia-associated proteins (e.g. glyceraldehyde- 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, a glycolytic enzyme), induction of the heat shock response (see below), and induction of glucose-regulated proteins. If these changes are inadequate to prevent ATP depletion, membrane ion pumps fail and membrane integrity is lost. Increased intracellular Ca^2 ^ occurs and a variety of degradative processes are initiated, leading to cytoplasmic swelling and eventual cell death.
Agents that provoke oxidative injury include pro- ducts of oxidative metabolism (especially from the mitochondria) and those released from activated phagocytes. Collectively, they are called reactive oxygen species (ROS), and include superoxide, hy- drogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical (the generation of which depends on availability of ferrous ion and superoxide) and nitric oxide. Iron, which is essential for DNA synthesis and oxidative metabolism, also catalyses the Fenton and Haber-Weiss reactions, converting superoxide to molecular oxygen and hydrogen peroxide to the hydroxyl radical. Under normal conditions, free iron is compartmentalized by the protein ferritin, which “protects” the cell by keeping iron in a non-reactive crystallized core as ferric ion (Fe^3 ). The results of the oxidative reactions of ROS include de-energization of mito- chondria and loss of energy stores, peroxidation and disruption of lipid membranes, and direct DNA damage. The adaptive response of the cell to oxidative stress includes both enzymatic and non-enzymatic capacities and induction of oxidative stress response proteins [9]. Superoxide dismutase reduces super- oxide to molecular oxygen and hydrogen peroxide; catalase catalyses the conversion of this hydrogen peroxide to oxygen and water. Reduced glutathione (which reacts with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of glutathione peroxidase to form water and oxidized glutathione), vitamin C and vitamin E constitute the
J. P ERREN COBB*, MD, T IMOTHY G. B UCHMAN, PHD, MD (Department of Surgery); R ICHARD S. H OTCHKISS, MD (Depart- ment of Anesthesia); IRENE KARL, PHD (Department of Medicine); Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. *Address for correspondence: Campus Box 8109, Department of Surgery, 660 South Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA.
4 British Journal of Anaesthesia
major intracellular reducing (non-enzymatic) agents. Several proteins are induced under oxidative stress, the most important of which may be metallothionein, which binds not only heavy metals but also ROS via the free sulphydryl groups of its many cysteine residues. ROS also activate the transcriptional factors AP-1 and NFB, both of which promote transcription of cytokines and have been associated with induction of apoptotic cell death (see below). If these adaptive responses are inadequate to prevent depletion of cellular glutathione, then cell protein thiol groups become the remaining reducing agents, leading to loss of critical enzymatic function and cell death.
The highly conserved cellular response to heat, known as the heat shock response, is associated with induction of heat shock proteins (HSP). The most extensively studied are the HSP 70 family, which includes stress-induced HSP 72. Interestingly, HSP also are induced by a variety of other cellular insults, including ischaemia/reperfusion, oxidative stress, exposure to heavy metals (e.g. arsenite) and in- fection. For this reason, the heat shock response is called simply the “stress response”, and HSP are known as “stress proteins”. Control of HSP tran- scription is mediated by heat shock element ac- tivation in the heat shock protein promoter region. HSP aid in the proper folding of newly translated proteins, and are referred to as “molecular chaper- ones”. Increased production of HSP is believed to provide an adaptive advantage to stressed cells by increasing the fidelity of protein synthesis and aiding refolding of damaged or denatured proteins.
Although “acute phase response” can refer to the response of any tissue to injury, its use is commonly restricted to the dramatic chan ge in the pattern of hepatocyte protein synthesis. The most important stimuli are interleukin 1 (IL-1), tumour necrosis factor (TNF), and IL-6, products of macrophage/ monocyte activation. The hepatocyte response to these cytokines is an outpouring of plasma proteins
that fun ction to main tain the homeostasis of the organism. They include C-reactive protein, fibrino- gen, complement, the metal binding proteins hapto- globin and ferritin, and plasminogen activator in- hibitor and many others. The acute phase response (activation) of endothelial cells includes increased surface expression of adhesion, selectin and integrin molecules that facilitate leucocyte adhesion and release of IL-1, IL-6, IL-8 and platelet activating factor (PAF).
If the genetic and metabolic adaptive responses described above are inadequate for a given injury, the cell will die. Increased interest in the mechanisms responsible for cell death, however, has made it clear that morphological classification of cell death requires revision. At least two types of cell death have been described. In the first, cell damage is manifested by cytoplasmic swelling, plasma mem- brane blebbing, dilation of the endoplasmic reticu- lum and mitochondria, dissolution of chromatin and, finally, interruption of membrane integrity. The other, less frequently observed type of cell death was described by Kerr [16] and called shrinkage necrosis. It is manifested by cytoplasmic shrinkage, larger plasma membrane buds and nuclear chromatin condensation. Both types of cell death result in the generation of necrotic debris that is engulfed by phagocytic cells.
TERMINOLOGY The morphological changes described above are not restrictive. Nuclear condensation and mitochondrial swelling, for example, have been observed in both swelling and shrinkage types of cell death. There is also clear evidence of significant overlap between them at the molecular level (see below) [11, 14, 18]. Moreover, there is considerable imprecision in the literature regarding the terminology of cell death. Historically, necrosis has been the term used to refer to cell death in general. The term apoptosis (coined by Kerr, Wyllie, and Currie from the Greek word meaning “dropping off ”, as in leaves dropping from a tree [17]) is now used specifically to describe death manifested by cell shrinkage. Apoptosis is respon- sible for the ordered, normal cell death of intestinal epithelial cells and blood neutrophils. Programmed cell death , which refers to the ordered death of cells during embryogenesis, however, is also characterized by cell shrinkage. Apoptosis and programmed cell death are frequently, but in- correctly, used interchangeably. The question of what to call non-apoptotic cell death has been problematic. Necrosis , a leading contender, is also used to refer to the process of removal of the cellular remains of apoptosis (so-called “post-apoptotic necrosis” [18]) [11, 32]. This degree of imprecision led Farber recently to remark that “there is no field of basic cell biology and cell pathology that is more confusing and unintelligible than is the area of apoptosis versus necrosis ” [11]. Consequently, several
Table 1 Mechanisms of cell injury
(1) Physical (a) ionizing radiation (b) temperature (c) mechanical trauma (2) Chemical (a) drugs (b) poisons (3) Biological (a) enzymes (b) cytokines (c) viral infection (d) cell-mediated (4) Critical substrate deficiency (a) oxygen (b) glucose
6 British Journal of Anaesthesia
authors have reviewed this subject in an attempt to standardize terminology and separate the process from the morphology of cell death [11, 14, 15, 18].
PROCESS OF CELL DEATH
From a pathological standpoint, it is important to distinguish between the process of cells dying per se from the changes that occur in cells after death [11, 18]. Majno and Joris [18] have characterized the process of cell death as (1) cell death by ischaemia, (2) cell death by accident, or (3) cell death by suicide. Accidental cell death is used to describe death as a result of an external agent or toxin. Both cell death secondary to ischaemia and accident are usually characterized morphologically by cell swelling. In this type of cell death, interference with ATP generation secondary to hypoxia or toxin-induced increases in plasma membrane permeability produce membrane failure. Reversible consequences of injury include cytoplasmic blebbing, nuclear chromatin condensation, dilation of the endoplasmic reticulum, condensation then swelling of mitochondria and activation of stress response genetic programmes (described above). Continued injury results in inter- ruptions of membrane integrity, dissolution of chromatin, and calcifications within mitochondria, all of which are signs of irreversible cell injury and death. Majno and Joris [18] have suggested the term oncosis , from the Greek word meaning “swelling”, for this type of cell death. Necrosis is the mor- phological term used for the cellular debris re- maining after either oncosis or apoptosis [18].
Death by suicide refers to the process of cell death in which in jury activates a highly con served pro- gramme of “suicide” genes that engineer death of the cell. This process typically results morpho- logically in apoptosis. Interest in cell death by suicide (apoptosis) has gained considerable momen- tum recently as the disorders associated with apop- totic cell death have expanded to include cancer, autoimmunity, inflammation, infection, AIDS, neurodegeneration and myelodysplasia [31]. The molecular trigger responsible for induction of apop- tosis is incompletely defined, but appears to be present in all mammalian cells at all times and is conserved across species. Not surprisingly, induction of apoptosis is tightly controlled. Several regulatory genes have been identified, including the Bcl- family, p53 and Fas [21, 25]. The molecular ma- chinery responsible (the “executioner”) includes a cysteine protease (CPP-32 in mammals) that may inactivate DNA repair enzymes [19, 23, 35]. The cellular changes characteristic of apoptosis include a “flip” of phosphatidylserine from the inside to the outside surface of the cell membrane [33], cyto- plasmic shrinkage, little or no swelling of organelles (mitochondria), membrane budding and fragmen- tation that include mitochondria or nuclear frag- ments, and chromatin condensation consisting of DNA fragments. These membrane changes lead to rapid recognition and cell elimination by neigh- bouring phagocytes, which may make apoptotic cells difficult to locate using conventional microscopic techniques. The techniques that are used to detect apoptosis include light and electron microscopy (fig.
Figure 2 Micrographs (360 magnification) of murine thymocytes from normal (A, sham laparotomy) and septic (B, caecal ligation and puncture) mice photographed using the fluorescent TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labelling) technique. Cells are permeabilized and treated with fluorescein labelled dUTP and terminal deoxynucleotide transferase. Note that in the control mice, all nuclei appear dark (A). In contrast, nuclei of septic mice (B) are fluorescent, consistent with DNA strand breaks and apoptosis.
Mechanisms of cell injury and death 7
1), end-labelling of DNA fragments (fig. 2), DNA agarose gel electrophoresis and binding of nuclear- specific dyes (fig. 3). Despite the relatively clear distinction which can be made morphologically (oncosis versus apoptosis is compared in table 2), examin ation at the molecular level demonstrates considerable overlap. For example, both oncosis and apoptosis have been associated with increases in intracellular Ca^2 , which activate a number of enzymes including phospho- lipases, endonucleases, proteases and protein kinases. In addition, the adaptive response to ischaemic, inflammatory, oxidant and heat-induced stress in- volve changes in gene expression that are shared by both types of cell death. Further, the same type of
injury can result in cell death by either mode. Indeed, Kerr’s original description of apoptosis (“shrin kage n ecrosis”) was based upon differ- entiation of shrunken necrotic cells from the more common swollen necrotic cells in ischaemic liver tissue [16].
Studies of cellular responses in vivo indicate that in jury activates the programmes of stress gen e expression reviewed above. For example, the hepato- cellular response to ischaemic injury in a porcine model of MODS includes activation of the acute phase, oxidative, and heat shock responses [7]. In
Figure 3 Normal cultured porcine aortic endothelial cells (A, 360 magnification) stained with nuclear binding dye Hoechst 33342. The nuclei are smooth and ovoid. Nuclei from cells challenged with endotoxin followed by arsenite are compact and fragmented (“apoptotic bodies”, B, 360 magnification).
Table 2 Comparison of characteristics of oncosis and apoptosis
Oncosis—death by swelling Apoptosis—death by shrinkage
(1) Swelling of organelles and cytoplasm (1) Shrinkage of cytoplasm (2) Small dense chromatin clumps which are not sharply defined
(2) Large, dense, often crescent-shaped aggregates of chromatin and nuclear fragmentation (3) Swelling and eventual disintegration of organelles (e.g. mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum)
(3) Organelles maintain structural integrity
(4) Early focal disruption of the plasma membrane with blebbing
(4) Plasma membrane maintains integrity early; later stage characterized by budding of membrane, frequently containing organelles (5) DNA agarose gel electrophoresis demonstrates smear pattern indicative of randomized breakdown
(5) DNA agarose gel electrophoresis demonstrates “ladder” pattern of discrete internucleosomal breakdown (6) Cells rupture and contents are released causing inflammatory response
(6) Cells are either ingested whole by phagocytic cells, or they break into membrane-bound fragments (apoptotic bodies) which then are ingested
Mechanisms of cell injury and death 9
bution. The stimulus itself frequently does not result directly in cell death, but rather the magnitude of the appropriate response from stimulated cells collec- tively is injurious to the organism. For instance, small doses of i.v. lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin) in humans are not directly cytotoxic, but lead to the release of the intercellular mediators, such as cyto- kines, that amplify the stimulus and trigger organ dysfunction [30]. Unfortunately, attempts to at- tenuate the magnitude of this response by attacking the circulating mediators themselves (e.g. anti- endotoxin and anti-cytokine therapies) have failed to improve patient survival in randomized, prospective trials [22]. These negative data forced a broad re- examination of the treatment strategies for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and MODS and a change in focus from extracellular signals (i.e. the mediators) to the intracellular responses to these signals [8]. Recent symposia have addressed this important issue (e.g. “The Future of Sepsis Research”, August 1995, Bethesda, MD, USA, sponsored by the American College of Chest Physicians, National Institute of Allergy and In- fectious Disease, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and National Institutes of Health, USA).
CELLULAR RESPONSES TO INJURY
In summary, the data presented above are consistent with a n ew hypothesis on the cellular origin of MODS, one that has emerged as a result of a change in focus from the extracellular to the intracellular response to injury. They suggest that there are distinct, exclusive, and prioritized genetic pro- grammes expressed in response to cell injury that are specific to cell type and injury. The effects of these stress response gene programmes are usually cyto- protective, but when activated in sequence, they can precipitate apoptotic cell death. Recent success in modulating induction of apoptosis with reducing agents [1], anti-oxidants [2], inhibitors of protein synthesis [5], anti-TNF antibody [34] and steroid antagonists [3] suggests that pharmacological control in the clin ical settin g is possible. A complete understanding of the type, sequence, interaction and impact of stress gene responses to injury will form the basis for novel gene-directed therapy for the treatment and prevention of MODS.
10 British Journal of Anaesthesia
fluorescein labelled Annexin V. Journal of Immunological Methods 1995; 184 : 39–51.