



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The concept of measurable functions, their definition, and properties. Measurable functions are essential in measure theory and integration theory. the definition of measurable functions, the equivalence of certain conditions for measurability, and operations on measurable functions. It also discusses the relationship between measurable functions and sets of measure zero, and provides exercises for further practice.
What you will learn
Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Dung Le^1
It is necessary to determine the class of functions that will be considered for the Lebesgue integration. We want to guarantee that the sets which arise when working with these functions are measurable. In this context, as well as in many others, the inverse images of sets are more useful than the images of sets. For example, a function is continuous if and only if the inverse image of each open set is open. A variation of this leads to the concept of measurable function.
Definition 1.1 A function f : E → IR is measurable if E is a measurable set and for each real number r, the set {x ∈ E : f (x) > r} is measurable.
As stated in the definition, the domain of a measurable function must be a measurable set. In fact, we will always assume that the domain of a function (measurable or not) is a measurable set unless explicitly mentioned otherwise. From the definition, it is clear that continuous functions and monotone functions are measurable. However, just as there are sets that are not measurable, there are functions that are not measurable.
Let E be a measurable set with positive measure and let A ⊆ E. The function χA represents the characteristic function of A. That is,
χA(x) =
1 x ∈ A 0 x 6 ∈ A
The set {x ∈ E : χA(x) > r} is either ∅, A, or E (check this!). So, χA is a measurable function if and only if A is a measurable set.
Theorem 1.2 Let E be a measurable set and let f : E → IR. The following are equivalent:
(1) For each real number r, the set {x ∈ E : f (x) > r} is measurable.
(2) For each real number r, the set {x ∈ E : f (x) ≥ r} is measurable.
(3) For each real number r, the set {x ∈ E : f (x) < r} is measurable.
(4) For each real number r, the set {x ∈ E : f (x) ≤ r} is measurable.
Proof: To see (1)⇔(2) we simply note that (check it!)
{x ∈ E : f (x) ≥ r} =
n=
{x ∈ E : f (x) > r −
n
(^1) Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Texas at San Antonio, 6900 North Loop 1604 West, San Antonio, TX 78249. Email: dle@math.utsa.edu
{x ∈ E : f (x) > r} =
n=
{x ∈ E : f (x) ≥ r +
n
The other implications are established by taking complements.
When working with functions, sets of measure zero can often be ignored. A property is said to hold almost everywhere (we will abbreviate it by a.e.) if it holds everywhere except for a set of measure zero. For example, the functions f : E → IR and g : E → IR are equal almost everywhere if and only if the set {x ∈ E : f (x) 6 = g(x)} has measure zero. Similarly, f is continuous a.e. iff the set of discontinuity points has measure 0.
Theorem 1.3 Let f : E → IR be measurable and let g : E → IR. If f = g a.e.on E, then g is measurable.
Proof: For r ∈ IR, let A = {x ∈ E : f (x) > r} and A = {x ∈ E : g(x) > r}. Then A is measurable and A − B, B − A are subsets of {x ∈ E : f (x) 6 = g(x)} so that they have zero measures. Since
B = (B − A)
is measurable. Thus, g is measurable.
Theorem 2.1 Let f : E → IR and g : E → IR be measurable functions and let k ∈ IR. Then the functions kf, f + g, |f | and f g are measurable. In addition, the function f /g is measurable if g(x) 6 = 0 for all x ∈ E.
Proof: We will only prove that f +g is measurable as the others will be left as exercises. Let r be any real number. If f (x) + g(x) > r, then there exists a rational number q such that r − g(x) < q < f (x). It follows that
{x ∈ E : (f + g)(x) > r} =
q∈Q
{x ∈ E : f (x) > q}
{x ∈ E : g(x] > r − q}.
Hence, f + g is a measurable function.
The following more general theorem will be useful.
Theorem 2.2 Let f and g be measurable functions defined on E. Let F be real and con- tinuous function on IR^2. Then the function h(x) = F (f (x), g(x)) is measurable.
Proof: Let Gr = {(u, v) : F (u, v) > r}. Then Gr is an open subset of IR^2 , and thus we can write it as a countable union of open rectangles. That is, Gr =
n In^ where
In = {(u, v) : an < u < bn, cn < v < dn}.
Theorem 2.4 Let {fn} be a sequence of measurable functions defined on E. For x ∈ E, set
g(x) = sup n
fn(x) and h(x) = lim sup n
fn(x).
Then g and h are measurable.
Proof: We need only to show that g is measurable since the measurability of h comes from this fact and the relations (2.1), (2.3) (exercise!). For any r ∈ IR, we have
{x ∈ E : g(x) > r} =
n
{x ∈ E : fn(x) > r}.
This shows that g is measurable.
Let {fn} be a sequence of functions on E that converges a.e.to a function f. This is to say that the set C = {x ∈ E : limn fn(x) exists} satisfies μ(E − C) = 0. Thus, f is only defined on C. However, since E − C has measure zero, it does not matter how the functions fn are defined there! As this situation will arise frequently, we will agree upon the convention that, unless otherwise stated, such functions are equal to zero on E − C. Hence, f is now conveniently defined on the whole set E!
We now have
Corollary 2.5 Let fn be a sequence be a sequence of measurable functions defined on E and f : E → IR. If {fn} converges pointwise to f a.e.on E, then f is measurable.
The following theorem provides another useful characterization of measurable functions.
Theorem 2.6 f : E → IR is measurable iff f −^1 (B) is measurable for every Borel set B.
Proof: Suppose that f is measurable. Let’s define the following collection
A = {A ⊆ IR : f −^1 (A) is measurable}.
We can easily check the followings (exercise):
n An^ ∈ A^ (f^
n An) =^
n f^
− (^1) (An)).
This shows that A is a σ-algebra. Moreover, since f is measurable, any open interval (a, b) must be in A (That is, f −^1 ((a, b)) is measurable (why?)). Thus, A contains all open sets (why?). From the definition of Borel sets, we see that they must be in A. Hence, f −^1 (B) is measurable for all B ∈ B. The converse is trivial (check it!).
Exercises
α Aα) =^
α f^
− (^1) (Aα) and f − (^1) (⋂ α Aα) =^
α f^
− (^1) (Aα).
f (x) =
1 x ∈ Q 0 x 6 ∈ Q
, g(x) =
x^2 x ∈ Q 0 x 6 ∈ Q
, h(x) =
x^3 + x^2 x ∈ Q sin(x) x 6 ∈ Q
fn(x) =
1 − nx x ∈ [0, 1 /n] 0 x > 1 /n
Let f (x) = limn fn(x).
(a) Is f continuous? (b) Is f measurable?