Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Management of Organizational conflict, Lecture notes of Communication

It cover about how to management the conflict between the management, and in the company.

Typology: Lecture notes

2020/2021

Available from 06/01/2022

sodexlife
sodexlife 🇮🇳

5

(2)

15 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Management of Organizational Conflicts
There are a number of different ways of managing organizational conflict, which are
highlighted in this section. Conflict management refers to resolving disagreements
effectively.
Ways to Manage Conflict
Change the Structure
When structure is a cause of dysfunctional conflict, structural change can be the solution to
resolving the conflict. Consider this situation. Vanessa, the lead engineer in charge of new
product development, has submitted her components list to Tom, the procurement officer, for
purchasing. Tom, as usual, has rejected two of the key components, refusing the expenditure
on the purchase. Vanessa is furious, saying, ―Every time I give you a request to buy a new
part, you fight me on it. Why can’t you ever trust my judgment and honor my request?‖
Tom counters, ―You’re always choosing the newest, leading-edge parts—they’re hard to find
and expensive to purchase. I’m supposed to keep costs down, and your requests always break
my budget.‖
―But when you don’t order the parts we need for a new product, you delay the whole
project,‖ Vanessa says.
Sharon, the business unit’s vice president, hits upon a structural solution by stating, ―From
now on, both of you will be evaluated on the total cost and the overall performance of the
product. You need to work together to keep component costs low while minimizing quality
issues later on.‖ If the conflict is at an intergroup level, such as between two departments, a
structural solution could be to have those two departments report to the same executive, who
could align their previously incompatible goals.
Change the Composition of the Team
If the conflict is between team members, the easiest solution may be to change the
composition of the team, separating the personalities that were at odds. In instances in which
conflict is attributed to the widely different styles, values, and preferences of a small number
of members, replacing some of these members may resolve the problem. If that’s not possible
because everyone’s skills are needed on the team and substitutes aren’t available, consider a
physical layout solution. Research has shown that when known antagonists are seated directly
across from each other, the amount of conflict increases. However, when they are seated side
by side, the conflict tends to decrease (Gordon et al., 1990).
Create a Common Opposing Force
Group conflict within an organization can be mitigated by focusing attention on a common
enemy such as the competition. For example, two software groups may be vying against each
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Management of Organizational conflict and more Lecture notes Communication in PDF only on Docsity!

Management of Organizational Conflicts

There are a number of different ways of managing organizational conflict, which are highlighted in this section. Conflict management refers to resolving disagreements effectively.

Ways to Manage Conflict

Change the Structure

When structure is a cause of dysfunctional conflict, structural change can be the solution to resolving the conflict. Consider this situation. Vanessa, the lead engineer in charge of new product development, has submitted her components list to Tom, the procurement officer, for purchasing. Tom, as usual, has rejected two of the key components, refusing the expenditure on the purchase. Vanessa is furious, saying, ―Every time I give you a request to buy a new part, you fight me on it. Why can’t you ever trust my judgment and honor my request?‖

Tom counters, ―You’re always choosing the newest, leading-edge parts—they’re hard to find and expensive to purchase. I’m supposed to keep costs down, and your requests always break my budget.‖

―But when you don’t order the parts we need for a new product, you delay the whole project,‖ Vanessa says.

Sharon, the business unit’s vice president, hits upon a structural solution by stating, ―From now on, both of you will be evaluated on the total cost and the overall performance of the product. You need to work together to keep component costs low while minimizing quality issues later on.‖ If the conflict is at an intergroup level, such as between two departments, a structural solution could be to have those two departments report to the same executive, who could align their previously incompatible goals.

Change the Composition of the Team

If the conflict is between team members, the easiest solution may be to change the composition of the team, separating the personalities that were at odds. In instances in which conflict is attributed to the widely different styles, values, and preferences of a small number of members, replacing some of these members may resolve the problem. If that’s not possible because everyone’s skills are needed on the team and substitutes aren’t available, consider a physical layout solution. Research has shown that when known antagonists are seated directly across from each other, the amount of conflict increases. However, when they are seated side by side, the conflict tends to decrease (Gordon et al., 1990).

Create a Common Opposing Force

Group conflict within an organization can be mitigated by focusing attention on a common enemy such as the competition. For example, two software groups may be vying against each

other for marketing dollars, each wanting to maximize advertising money devoted to their product. But, by focusing attention on a competitor company, the groups may decide to work together to enhance the marketing effectiveness for the company as a whole. The ―enemy‖ need not be another company—it could be a concept, such as a recession, that unites previously warring departments to save jobs during a downturn.

Consider Majority Rule

Sometimes a group conflict can be resolved through majority rule. That is, group members take a vote, and the idea with the most votes is the one that gets implemented. The majority rule approach can work if the participants feel that the procedure is fair. It is important to keep in mind that this strategy will become ineffective if used repeatedly with the same members typically winning. Moreover, the approach should be used sparingly. It should follow a healthy discussion of the issues and points of contention, not be a substitute for that discussion.

Problem Solve

Problem solving is a common approach to resolving conflict. In problem-solving mode, the individuals or groups in conflict are asked to focus on the problem, not on each other, and to uncover the root cause of the problem. This approach recognizes the rarity of one side being completely right and the other being completely wrong.

Conflict-Handling Styles

Individuals vary in the way that they handle conflicts. There are five common styles of handling conflicts. These styles can be mapped onto a grid that shows the varying degree of cooperation and assertiveness each style entails. Let us look at each in turn.

Figure 10.6 Conflict-Handling Styles

The collaborating style is high on both assertiveness and cooperation. This is a strategy to use for achieving the best outcome from conflict—both sides argue for their position, supporting it with facts and rationale while listening attentively to the other side. The objective is to find a win–win solution to the problem in which both parties get what they want. They’ll challenge points but not each other. They’ll emphasize problem solving and integration of each other’s goals. For example, an employee who wants to complete an MBA program may have a conflict with management when he wants to reduce his work hours. Instead of taking opposing positions in which the employee defends his need to pursue his career goals while the manager emphasizes the company’s need for the employee, both parties may review alternatives to find an integrative solution. In the end, the employee may decide to pursue the degree while taking online classes, and the company may realize that paying for the employee’s tuition is a worthwhile investment. This may be a win–win solution to the problem in which no one gives up what is personally important, and every party gains something from the exchange.