

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
This letter explores the author's personal connection to the indian epic ramayan and its various interpretations, focusing on the unique adaptation 'sita sings the blues'. The author discusses the use of blues music in the film and its connection to the themes of the ramayan, as well as the different versions of the ramayan and their contextualization within various religious and cultural frameworks. The letter also touches upon the depiction of gender roles in the ramayan and the implications of reinterpreting the epic in a contemporary context.
What you will learn
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Dear Ms Paley, I walked into the classroom in an absolutely drowsy state with a tired body after a long and hectic day with multiple classes. Your movie Sita Sings the Blues is played on screen. The very first bout of music and then the first scene where Sita emerges from the sea and eventually starts grooving to the music piqued my interest. The blues music, along with the cut-out and the electronic production alerted my senses. I had not envisioned the Ramayan the way you recreated it. Being born in India the Ramayan inevitably became a story I was retold many times. My memory of Ramayan extends beyond the oral narrations. As I write to you, Ms Paley, I recollect 7-8 different books and movies through which I engaged with the Ramayan. I am sure I have watched the Ramayan in other movies of it and read it in other books. As I watched your movie, the first thing to catch my attention was the choice of music, whether it is the music playing in the background, the transitions or the songs Sita sings. The blues music which finds its origin in the late 19th early 20th century by the African-Americans started off as a medium of expression of the struggles of the black life in America. Blues was both the medium and vocalisation of the African-American dissent against their treatment. Ramayan, being a quintessential Indian myth, similarly does a great job of depicting patriarchy, supernatural elements, sacrifice, parental domination among other prevalent themes. The juxtapositioning of blues and the Ramayan, as far fetched as it may seem, is absolutely fitting in Sita Sings the Blue. Sita Sings the Blues is not the only version of Ramayan, that I have engaged with, that breaks from the Valmiki’s version of it. I have strong visual recollections of the only time I attended a Jain dharmic class out of compulsion and the teacher, or the guruji as everyone referred to him, started talking of the Jain version of Ramayan. This version of Ramayan portrays Ram as a sinner, someone who is condemned to hell for his deeds. Ravan, in the same version of Ramayan, is an extremely sacrosanct creature who will become a Tirthankara in the next set of Tirthankaras, the messengers of the Jain philosophy, by washing away his bad deeds through austerity and good karma. Every state in India has its own version of Ramayan. In fact, dividing the different versions state- wise is an inaccurate way of categorising given the distribution of ethnicities and cultural groups across India and how almost all of them have their own version of Ramayan. These versions barely adhere to the usual version of Ramayan. One depicts Ramayan as a spiritual saga where Ram is a personification of the inner soul and Ravan of the ego. But then, what is mythology? A story with some central characters and a brief central plot which has varying interpretations of itself across different cultures, religions and geographies. Ramayan is no exception. A. K. Ramanujan in an essay titled three-hundred Ramayans used 5 versions of Ramayan to dissect and understand this aspect unique to any mythological story.
Sita Sings the Blues then becomes a part of the mythology. “Modern-day Ramayan”, “Re- interpreting the Ramayan” or any label indicating how your version of Ramayan is different from “the Ramayan” is farce. Just like all the versions and interpretation of the Ramayan have become a part of the myth, Sita Sings the Blues also becomes the part of the myth. The Jain philosophy propagates absolute non-violence in our deeds, words and thoughts. Ram then, owing to all the creatures he kills and gets killed to reclaim Sita, becomes a sinner and is condemned to hell. The Jain version of Ramayan is contextualised to the Jain philosophy and religious structure. Sita Sings the Blues then is no different from the different versions of the Ramayan in spirit. The impossibility of the Ramayan manifesting the way it is traditionally depicted raises, to a curious mind, questions like how does one contextualize Ramayan to the contemporary setting. Ramayan’s depiction of patriarchy is a very traditional one. In India, any woman’s identity is synonymous with her husband’s. This synonymity extends to the physical realm such that Sita accompanies him on his exile. Sita in Valmiki’s Ramayan is a depiction of how society envisioned an ideal wife and woman then. She accompanies her husband on his exile and while Ram is serving his father’s orders Sita is merely fulfilling the expectations from a wife. Her exile is devoid of any purpose. After being abducted by Ravan, when she has the chance to escape with Hanuman, she refuses. Why? She believes a woman’s real place is with her man and this belief extends to her waiting for Ram to come and take her along. This decision of hers sets the plot of Ramayan to have a male hero in the end. On returning, Sita is claimed to be unpure because she lived in another man’s house. The onus of proving her purity falls on her. All of this happens in your movie but with a contextual twist. In one of the 2 parallel Ramayan narratives, Sita is the image of a 36-24-36 sized woman, who sings the blues. The subject of her songs is limited to the sagas and the emotional turmoil accompanying those sagas, with respect to her man. The lack of agency and independent identity of women, which is a common narrative today as it was when the Ramayan was first narrated is highlighted through the songs Sita sings. The contextualising is not limited to Sita. Ram’s depiction in the same narrative is one of a broad-chested, Johny Bravoesque macho who asserts his control over Sita at every stage. Towards the beginning of the movie the shadow cutouts try to recollect the date of the Ramayan but none of them know for sure and they settle for “a long, long, time ago”. The origin of the Ramayan is ambiguous. Just as attributing mythology to a specific place or cultural setting is futile, attributing Ramayan to a certain period or date makes little sense. Just like every other version of Ramayan, or, forget the versions, just like Ramayan in its comprehensive form which is inclusive of all the versions of it, your telling makes alterations. Laxman here does not accompany Sita and Ram on exile. Sita Sings the Blues then is as much Ramayan as Valmiki’s version of it. Do mythologies have the scope for being renamed then? Imagine contextualising Ramayan to a space where gender norms are absent, and sexes are equal. But will you call it Ramayan then?