



















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Absolute rights are rights that are guaranteed all the time and which may not be limited in any way, for example the prohibition of torture and inhuman or ...
Typology: Exams
1 / 27
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Independent enquirers, team workers FUNCTIONAL SKILLS: Speed reading and skim reading, sorting information for relevance, introduction to working with legal documents, time management and working as a team OBJECTIVES:
Ask the students: What do you consider human rights to be? Try writing down a sentence or two that explains what human rights are.
Read or paraphrase the following for the class: You may have heard the term ‘human rights’ being used in different situations, often with someone saying that a person’s human rights have been violated. In this lesson we are going to learn what human rights are, where they come from, and how they are protected.
Students should come out of the discussion understanding that human rights are rights that everybody possesses by virtue of being human and which every person needs in order to live happily, healthily and with dignity.
Now look at the student version of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). In your groups, can you find similar rights in the UDHR to the four you wrote down? Write the article number from the UDHR next to your answers above.
Class discussion: Compare your answers with the rest of the class. Of the human rights that you wrote down, which do you think is the most important and why?
The three broad categories of human rights There are three broad categories of human rights: civil and political rights, socio- economic rights and collective rights. Although there is a small overlap between the categories, in general: Civil and political rights^1 are rights that protect individual liberty and security and also protect individuals from an abuse of power by the state. They allow individuals to take part equally and without discrimination in the civil and political life of their countries. Examples of civil and political rights include: right to life, freedom from torture and slavery, right to liberty, freedom of thought, freedom of expression. Socio-economic rights^2 are rights that allow individuals to enjoy social, economic and cultural development equally and without discrimination. Countries are required to implement socio-economic rights progressively, to the maximum extent possible as permitted by their resources. Examples of socio-economic rights include: the right to work and decent working conditions, the right to a decent standard of living and social security, the right to education and the right to be free from hunger. Collective rights^3 can be described as the collective-developmental rights of people. They consist of rights that allow people to determine their future development (self-determination) as well as certain special rights of ethnic and religious minorities to enjoy their culture, religion and language. Examples of collective rights include: the right to enjoyment of one’s environment and natural resources, the right to communicate, the right to enjoyment of cultural heritage, language and religion.
You may choose to do this activity if there is time.
Absolute rights are rights that are guaranteed all the time and which may not be limited in any way, for example the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; prohibition of slavery and forced labour; no punishment without law and the right to marry. Non-absolute rights are ‘derogable’ and some of those ‘derogable’ rights are also ‘limited.’ A right that is ‘derogable’ may be suspended for the greater good in times of public emergency. Most of the rights in the Human Rights Act are derogable rights. The criteria for derogating from rights is that it should be necessary and proportionate to do so (in light of the emergency that the country is facing) and the derogation must be in accordance with the country’s other international law obligations. For example, a country may be facing a terrorism threat and so a government may suspend the right to liberty for security reasons such as imposing a curfew on people. Some of the derogable rights are also limited. Limited rights are those whose scope may be limited by law in certain circumstances prescribed by the law in normal times (that is, where there is no public emergency.) For example, the right to liberty is a derogable right and also a limited right. Even where there is no public emergency people may have their liberty deprived by being imprisoned in accordance with the law where they have committed an offence. (This is explained further below in the answers to the exercise.)
Derogation The right may be derogated from in times of public emergency which, in the UK, means that the Secretary of State orders derogation where he/she considers necessary. For example, two months after the 9/11 attacks in New York, the UK Government introduced a derogation order to the effect that it intended, because of the threat of terrorism, to derogate from the Article 5 right to liberty under the European Convention on Human Rights in certain terrorism-related circumstances. Limitation The right to liberty is limited. A person may be deprived of his liberty in the following circumstances: (a) the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court; (b) the lawful arrest or detention of a person for non-compliance with the lawful order of a court or in order to secure the fulfilment of any obligation prescribed by law; (c)the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent his committing an offence or fleeing after having done so; (d) the detention of a minor by lawful order for the purpose of educational supervision or his lawful detention for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority; (e) the lawful detention of persons for the prevention of the spreading of infectious diseases, of persons of unsound mind, alcoholics or drug addicts or vagrants; (f) the lawful arrest or detention of a person to prevent his effecting an unauthorised entry into the country or of a person against whom action is being taken with a view to deportation or extradition. Case study on indefinite detention without trial (You may wish to present the case study to students on paper or simply explain the facts to them.) In 2004, the House of Lords ruled on a case^8 concerning nine foreigners who were being detained indefinitely in the UK on suspicion of terrorism links. The detainees argued that their detention infringed their right to liberty in Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Although a derogation from this right is possible, this is only allowed in times of emergency and must be necessary and proportionate to the threat. The House of Lords ruled that indefinite detention was not necessary and proportionate in this case and that the test of emergency was whether there was ‘threat to the life of the nation’ which was not fulfilled in this case.
Points 2, 3 and 4 are optional.
national law) whereas much (but not all) of the content of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child is reflected in different pieces of legislation. Having explained the fact that the rights contained in the Human Rights Act are derived from the European Convention which is derived from international law treaties and principles, you may like to use the diagram that you drew on the board for the students showing all the different places in law where a right may exist on national, regional and international levels.
Article 1—Everyone under 18 has these rights. Article 2—All children have these rights, no matter who they are, where they live, what their parents do, what language they speak, what their religion is, whether a boy or a girl, what their culture is, whether they have a disability, whether they are rich or poor. No child should be treated unfairly on any basis. Article 3—When decisions are made that affect children, the interests of children should be the most important consideration. When those in government make decisions, they should think about how their decisions will affect children. Article 4—The government has a responsibility to make sure children’s rights are protected, by making laws that respect children’s rights. Article 5—A child’s family has the responsibility to help him learn to exercise his rights, and to ensure that his rights are protected. Article 6—All children have the right to life, survival, and development. Article 7—All children have the right to a name, which will be officially recognised by the government. All children have the right to a nationality (to belong to a country). Article 8—All children have the right to an identity—an official record of who they are. No one should take this away from them. Article 9—All children have the right to live with their parents, unless it is not in their best interests. They have the right to live with a family who cares for them. Article 10—If a child lives in a different country from his/her parents, they have the right to be in contact with each other. Article 11—All children have the right to be protected from kidnapping. Article 12—A child’s views must be considered and taken into account in all matters affecting him/her. Article 13—All children have the right to information and to share what they think with others. However, this right can be limited if it infringes the rights or harms the reputations of others, or if it is for the protection of national security, public order, or public health or morals.