Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

jurisprudence basics, Summaries of Law

everything about law. The absolute basics.

Typology: Summaries

2019/2020

Uploaded on 11/28/2021

raghav-akshar
raghav-akshar 🇮🇳

1 document

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ARISTOTLE ON LAW AND JUSTICE
Considered by many as the father of ‘natural law’.
Aristotle was a student at Plato’s academy-revived philosophical education there-
entered at the age of 17 was there for 19 years.
Strongly influenced by his teacher Plato-but departed from Plats idea in many aspects.
Wrote or his authorship consists of 3 books: Nicomachean Ethics, The Politics and The
Rhetoric.
His views of natural law and justice-centered around these 3 books.
For Aristotle - Humans are both-political and social beings- to be human -is to live with
other humans and interactions.
Aristotle’s ‘true’ meaning on natural law is based on “Rhetoric”.
Aristotle’s definition of natural law: everything which is a principle of order within social
life- to the principles of customs, morals, manners and habits. For eg: dress attire in
someone’s funeral, visit to any holy or religious place
He further says- virtues of courage, temperance and justice- are all based on law-and
are in accordance with the dictates of law.
He further says- law is at work (function of law is )-when people submit to and feel bound
by propositions-deciding the worthiness or unworthiness of certain behaviour-within a
given community. Eg: Allan Turning and ‘homosexuality’
For him -law is - a ‘norm’- norm written or unwritten is not important. As per him - ‘norm’ -
is of decisive character-fixed in some way and enacted.
For him another function of law is - it facilitates social life.Did not talk about the
best/perfect State. For him State is based on law-as the only practical means of
achieving a good life.
As per him- ‘ Man when perfected is the best of animals-but if he is isolated from the law
and justice-he is the worst of all’.
For him 2 kinds of law exists: particular law and general law
Particular law: law applied in particular state in administering justice-may be a written
law or unwritten law-restricted to only those people who enacted it.eg: Laws applicable
to Indian territory.
General law: acknowledged and recognized by everybody-not confined to a particular
State- logically unwritten law-has universal applicability-law “according to nature”.Eg:
Universal laws - law of rhythm, laws of polarity etc.
As per him-the dispute of written law vs. unwritten law - will always be there- and non
bridging gap.
Pinpointed 4 distinct ways- ‘unwritten law’ can be used:
1. When actions in question are not within the purview of written law. Eg: distinction
between good habits and bad habits
2. Particular unwritten laws. E.g: time to sleep, time to act as per season change
etc.
3. Relationship of equity with unwritten law. As per him- certain conduct may be
‘illegal’ and still be ‘equitable’- and in situations- where the universality and
rigidity of legal rules may cause hardship in an individual case- he proposed to
cure such cases by means of equity. For him -equity is -rectification of law -as
law is defective- because of its generality- equity is -by putting reason above
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download jurisprudence basics and more Summaries Law in PDF only on Docsity!

● Considered by many as the father of ‘natural law’. ● Aristotle was a student at Plato’s academy-revived philosophical education there- entered at the age of 17 was there for 19 years. ● Strongly influenced by his teacher Plato-but departed from Plats idea in many aspects. ● Wrote or his authorship consists of 3 books: Nicomachean Ethics, The Politics and The Rhetoric. ● His views of natural law and justice-centered around these 3 books. ● For Aristotle - Humans are both-political and social beings- to be human -is to live with other humans and interactions. ● Aristotle’s ‘true’ meaning on natural law is based on “Rhetoric”. ● Aristotle’s definition of natural law: everything which is a principle of order within social life- to the principles of customs, morals, manners and habits. For eg: dress attire in someone’s funeral, visit to any holy or religious place ● He further says- virtues of courage, temperance and justice- are all based on law-and are in accordance with the dictates of law. ● He further says- law is at work (function of law is )-when people submit to and feel bound by propositions-deciding the worthiness or unworthiness of certain behaviour-within a given community. Eg: Allan Turning and ‘homosexuality’ ● For him -law is - a ‘norm’- norm written or unwritten is not important. As per him - ‘norm’ - is of decisive character-fixed in some way and enacted. ● For him another function of law is - it facilitates social life.Did not talk about the best/perfect State. For him State is based on law-as the only practical means of achieving a good life. ● As per him- ‘ Man when perfected is the best of animals-but if he is isolated from the law and justice-he is the worst of all’. ● For him 2 kinds of law exists: particular law and general law ● Particular law: law applied in particular state in administering justice-may be a written law or unwritten law-restricted to only those people who enacted it.eg: Laws applicable to Indian territory. ● General law: acknowledged and recognized by everybody-not confined to a particular State- logically unwritten law-has universal applicability-law “according to nature”.Eg: Universal laws - law of rhythm, laws of polarity etc. ● As per him-the dispute of written law vs. unwritten law - will always be there- and non bridging gap. ● Pinpointed 4 distinct ways- ‘unwritten law’ can be used:

  1. When actions in question are not within the purview of written law. Eg: distinction between good habits and bad habits
  2. Particular unwritten laws. E.g: time to sleep, time to act as per season change etc.
  3. Relationship of equity with unwritten law. As per him- certain conduct may be ‘illegal’ and still be ‘equitable’- and in situations- where the universality and rigidity of legal rules may cause hardship in an individual case- he proposed to cure such cases by means of equity. For him -equity is -rectification of law -as law is defective- because of its generality- equity is -by putting reason above

someone’s legal right. -equity- is the quality of being fair and impartial in a situation when the written law becomes applicable.

  1. Unwritten law is also identified with natural law. Natural law in the form of customs, habits etc. ● Aristotle with respect to law-also talks about the “law giver”. So even “GOD LIKE” man [the law giver]-should be governed by -RULE OF LAW. ● “Rule of law is always preferable.. To that of a single citizen….” as per Aristotle. ● So,the rightly constituted law should be the final sovereign. ● Law as per him- takes into consideration majority of cases- but is unable to do justice in a unique case-so where such cases arise-the judge may depart from the letter of law and decide the case as the lawgiver. ● Aristotle also talks about written law -the terminology used by him for the same is “non natural law”-and further he uses different names for written law such as - “not by nature”, “promulgated”, “based on agreement and convenience”, “merely human”. ● As per Aristotle- written law is a law- which is not in accordance with nature-which undergoes change. ● As per Aristotle- the best law is the law -which is unchangeable -law which always aims ‘at being best’ from the very beginning. ● Aristotle’s Theory of Justice ● Talked about Justice in Book V of Nicomachean Ethics. ● His definition of Justice- “ Justice is what he/she deserves”. -For Aristotle-he believes that debate about Justice-are unavoidably -debates about -Honour, virtue and nature of the good life. ● For Aristotle -JUSTICE- means giving people what they deserve-giving each person his or her due. ● But what is due to a person? What are the relevant grounds which determine what is due to a person?-As per Aristotle- that depends upon what’s being distributed. ● For him Justice- involves 2 factors: things and the person to whom things are assigned. ● And in general it can be said that-”persons who are equal should have assigned to them equal things”. ● But different questions equals in what respect ?-that as per him depends on what we are distributing-and the virtues relevant to those things. ● For eg: we are distributing guitars? Who should get the best ones?- As per him-the best guitar players. ● As per him-JUSTICE discriminates according to merit-according to relevant excellence. ● So in the above case of guitar playing-the RELEVANT MERIT is-the ability to play well. ● It would be unjust to discriminate on any other basis such as wealth, or nobility of birth or physical beauty or chance (lottery/luck). For e.g: to determine who is the best person - based on relevant merit- blind auditions for shows/orchestras. ● So we should look for the best guitar player- [so the quality of music-to produce best music-will be achieved]. ● But this is not Aristotle's reason- he thinks -the best guitar should go to the best guitar player because-that’s what guitar is for-to be played well- purpose of guitar-to produce excellent music.

people with practical wisdom -can deliberate well about what is good-not only for themselves but also their fellow citizens and for human beings in general.Practical wisdom-oriented to action-more than calculation-’it seeks to identify the highest human good attainable under the circumstances”. ● Aristotle also talked about the concept of “differential treatment of justice”-treat equals equally and unequals unequally. ● He also talked about different kinds of Justice. ● In a broader sense- justice can be divided into: universal justice and particular justice. ● Particular justice can further be subdivided into: distributive justice and remedial justice. ● Remedial justice can further be subdivided into: Justice dealing with voluntary transactions and justice dealing with involuntary transactions. ● Further justice can also be divided into:Commutative justice and commercial justice ● For Aristotle- universal justice is- justice achieved universally. When a law is applied everywhere with equal force universal justice is achieved. Eg: anywhere Positive laws that violate natural law is nullified. Eg: laws that violate the universal principle of ‘right to life’, ‘right to fair hearing’.- against the principle of universal justice. ● For Aristotle- particular justice is related to positive laws and customs which seek obedience. Eg: Tax Laws ● For Aristotle-distributive justice is distribution of offices and honours to individuals. ● For Aristotle- remedial justice aims to restore what an individual has lost due to injustice of the society. Remedial justice is also known as corrective justice-as it aims for virtue and moral excellence of character.Eg: Tihar Jail Upasana Programme-Juvenile Correction Homes- aims for uplifting the virtue and moral character of these juveniles and prisoners.. ● For Aristotle - Justice dealing with voluntary transactions means - in any situation where two or more individuals voluntarily enter- and one defaults then justice delivered in such a situation is Justice dealing with voluntary transactions. Eg: marriage between two parties- one partner turns celibate- other partner seeking divorce on this ground-divorce granted- then justice delivered in this sitaution is- Justice dealing with voluntary transactions. Eg: Justice delivered in cases of civil nature. ● For Aristotle - Justice dealing with involuntary transactions means- justice delivered in a situation where the situation entered by the parties was not voluntary in nature from the end of both parties- in any such situation when justice is delivered- its is as per Aristotle is- Justice dealing with involuntary transactions. Eg: Justice delivered in cases of criminal nature. ● As per Aristotle-commutative justice- is justice delivered between two individuals only. It is precise and accurate. It calls for fundamental fairness [in all agreements and exchanges between individuals or private social groups]. Commutative justice is [equitable exchange of goods and fulfillment of contractual obligations]. It also is concerned with situations where one individual acts against another -crime/perpetrator and victim -are all identifiable to everyone. ● As per Aristotle-Commercial Justice is-justice per se delivered in commercial transactions-through commercial laws. For eg. justice delivered by application of

mercantile law, trade law and competition law. For Eg. Justice delivered in India through ADR mechanism, Consumer Forums for consumer law cases. ● As per Aristotle - he further says that -there is no such thing as “permanent justice”-all rules of justice are variable in nature - so as per him Justice varies. As men advance- they develop a stronger moral sense-gain a mutual understanding -which also becomes greater-feeling of Justice becomes more refined. ● So as per Aristotle- Justice means “lawfulness” -concerned with the common advantage and happiness of the political community. ● Criticism of Aristotle’s Theory of Law and Justice ● “Rule of Law”, “Rightly constituted law”-he did not provide-meaning to these terminologies. ● For him the “best law”- is the unchangeable law from the very beginning-BUT-law also changes as the society progresses. ● As per him- Justice should always discriminate on the basis of merit-but justice also discriminates on the basis of wealth, nobility, physical beauty etc. ● For Aristotle- Justice means-and is concerned with the advantage and happiness of the political community-which is not the case always.