Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

JUDICIAL REVIEW MEANING, Study notes of Law

JUDICIAL REVIEW MEANING AND DETAILED REVIEW

Typology: Study notes

2018/2019

Uploaded on 11/13/2019

joosephcheriyan
joosephcheriyan šŸ‡®šŸ‡³

3 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
jubicial review is recognized as a necessary and a basic requirement for
construction up of a novel civilization in order to safeguard the liberty and rights of
the individuals. The power of judicial review is significanfly vested upon the High
Courts and the Supreme Court of lndia.
Under Article 13 of the lndian Constitution, the compulsion of judicial review was
described in fundamental rights in Part lll. lt is stated that the State or the Union
shall not make such rules that takes away or abridges the essential rights of the
people. lf any law made by the Parliament or the State Legislature contravenes the
provisions of this Article, shall be void[1].
Meaning of Judicial Review
Judicial Review can be understood
laMas a form of court proceeding, usually in the
ulness of a decision or action is reviewed by the
Administrative Court where the
judge. Where there is ns of challenge, judicial review is available.
The concern behind Jthat whether the law has been correctly
applied with and right been followed.[2]
Judicial Review And Constitution f lndia
ln order to scrutinize the legitima of administrative action and the statutes, the
Constitution of lndia has given iuences to the Higher courts and the Supreme
Court of lndia. To guard the righ of public and implement the fundamental rights
are the main objects of judicial iew. lf any difficulty arises between State and
Center relation, then Article 246 and the Schedule 7 of the Constitution has marked
the working zone for the regulation construction between both State and Center.
Judicial review has evolved in three dimensions:
# To protect the legality of essen al rights under Part lll of the lndian Constitution.
rganizational achievement.
3l
io
Laws inconsistent with or in de gation of the fundamental rights
(1) All laws in force in the territo of lndia immediately before the commencement of
this Constitution, in so far as th
shall, to the extent of such inco are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part,
sistency, be void
(2) The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights
conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the
extent of the contravention, be void
# To authorize the disinterest of
# lnterrogation of public interest.
Article 13 of the lndian Constitut n
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download JUDICIAL REVIEW MEANING and more Study notes Law in PDF only on Docsity!

jubicial (^) review is recognized as a necessary and a basic requirement (^) for construction up of a novel civilization (^) in order to safeguard the (^) liberty and rights (^) of the individuals. (^) The power (^) of judicial (^) review (^) is significanfly (^) vested upon the (^) High Courts and the Supreme (^) Court of lndia.

Under Article 13 of the lndian Constitution, the compulsion of judicial review was

described in (^) fundamental rights in Part lll. lt is stated that the State or the (^) Union shall not make such rules that takes away or abridges the essential rights (^) of the people. (^) lf any (^) law made by the Parliament (^) or the State Legislature contravenes the provisions (^) of this Article, shall be void[1].

Meaning of Judicial Review

Judicial Review (^) can be underst ood

laM

as a form of court proceeding, (^) usually in the Administrative Court where the ulness of a decision or action is reviewed (^) by the judge. (^) Where there is (^) ns of challenge, judicial (^) review is (^) available.

The concern behind (^) J that whether (^) the law has been correctly applied with and right been followed.[2]

Judicial Review And Constitution f lndia ln order to scrutinize the legitima of administrative action and the statutes, the

Constitution of lndia has given^ i uences to the Higher courts and the Supreme

Court of lndia. To guard^ the righ of public and implement the fundamental rights are the main objects of judicial^ iew. lf any difficulty arises between State and

Center relation, then Article 246 and the Schedule 7 of the Constitution has marked

the working zone for the regulation construction between both State and Center. Judicial review has evolved in three dimensions:

To protect (^) the legality of essen al rights under Part lll of the lndian Constitution.

rganizational achievement.

3l io

Laws inconsistent with or in de gation^ of the^ fundamental^ rights (1) All laws in force in the territo of lndia immediately before the^ commencement^ of this Constitution, in so far as th shall, to the extent of such^ inco

are inconsistent with^ the^ provisions^ of^ this^ Part, sistency, be void (2) (^) The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges^ the^ rights

conferred by^ this^ Part and any law made^ in^ contravention of^ this^ clause shall, to^ the

extent of the contravention, be^ void

To authorize the disinterest of

# lnterrogation of public^ interest.

Article 13 of the lndian Constitut n

(3) (^) ln this article, (^) unless the co ext otherwise requires law includes any Ordinance, order, bye law, rule, regulation, otification, custom or usages having in the territory of lndia the force of law; laws in force includes laws passed or made by Legislature or other competent authority in e territory of lndia before the commencement of this Constltution and not previo^ sly repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part^ thereof may not be the in operation either at all or in particular areas (4) Nothing in this (^) article shall ply (^) to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368 Right of Equ Judicial Review ln lndia

ity[4]

Judicialreview plays^ an import nt role as a protector^ when the executive, judiciary

and legislature harm the Cons utional values and deny the rights. The judicial assessment is^ considered as a indispensable feature in the country. ln lndia, there is parliamentary^ form of demo acy where (^) every section of people (^) is involved in decision making (^) and policy^ ma ing process. (^) lt is true that the primary duty of the court to apply rule of law and is the groundwork of social equality. By (^) exercising new powers (^) of Parliament, rule of I which is to be applied by the court cannot be

modified. Allthose here, who a doing public duty, are accountable. They have to

work within the democratic p^ isions of the Constitution of lndia. The concept of

separation of power^ and rule o law is judicial^ review. The influence of judicial assessment has been (^) so long nder Articles 226 and 227 in (^) case of High Court and Articles 32 and 136 of the Con titution of lndia for the review.[5] Mechanisms of Judicial Review

ln India, three aspects are covered by judicial^ review that are as follows:

Judicial review of legislative action

# Judicial review for j

Judicial review of a

These facets of judic

case ofl. Chandra Kumar^ v.^ U

have to interpret legislation up interrupted. To^ achieve^ this^ en

on action re pronounced^ by the Supreme Court of lndia^ in ton of lndia[6], stating that the^ judges^ of higher court

o this end that^ the^ Constitutional^ values^ are^ not^ to^ be

, the^ judges^ have^ to^ keep in mind that the

in the Constitution is not disturbed.[7]

udicialdecisi dministrative

ial review we

equilibrium of control, specifi Judicial Pronouncements

l.Shankari Prasad^ v.^ Union^ of^ ndia[8]

It was held by six^ judge^ bench,

rights under the lndian Constitt state of Kerala^ where^ six^ judge

five judges^ not agreed to^ amending^ the^ essential rti on. However, in case of Keshavanand^ Bharti^ v. ls out of seven^ judges^ held^ that^ Parliament modifying