

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
JUDICIAL REVIEW MEANING AND DETAILED REVIEW
Typology: Study notes
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
jubicial (^) review is recognized as a necessary and a basic requirement (^) for construction up of a novel civilization (^) in order to safeguard the (^) liberty and rights (^) of the individuals. (^) The power (^) of judicial (^) review (^) is significanfly (^) vested upon the (^) High Courts and the Supreme (^) Court of lndia.
described in (^) fundamental rights in Part lll. lt is stated that the State or the (^) Union shall not make such rules that takes away or abridges the essential rights (^) of the people. (^) lf any (^) law made by the Parliament (^) or the State Legislature contravenes the provisions (^) of this Article, shall be void[1].
Meaning of Judicial Review
Judicial Review (^) can be underst ood
as a form of court proceeding, (^) usually in the Administrative Court where the ulness of a decision or action is reviewed (^) by the judge. (^) Where there is (^) ns of challenge, judicial (^) review is (^) available.
The concern behind (^) J that whether (^) the law has been correctly applied with and right been followed.[2]
Judicial Review And Constitution f lndia ln order to scrutinize the legitima of administrative action and the statutes, the
Court of lndia. To guard^ the righ of public and implement the fundamental rights are the main objects of judicial^ iew. lf any difficulty arises between State and
the working zone for the regulation construction between both State and Center. Judicial review has evolved in three dimensions:
rganizational achievement.
3l io
Laws inconsistent with or in de gation^ of the^ fundamental^ rights (1) All laws in force in the territo of lndia immediately before the^ commencement^ of this Constitution, in so far as th shall, to the extent of such^ inco
are inconsistent with^ the^ provisions^ of^ this^ Part, sistency, be void (2) (^) The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges^ the^ rights
extent of the contravention, be^ void
(3) (^) ln this article, (^) unless the co ext otherwise requires law includes any Ordinance, order, bye law, rule, regulation, otification, custom or usages having in the territory of lndia the force of law; laws in force includes laws passed or made by Legislature or other competent authority in e territory of lndia before the commencement of this Constltution and not previo^ sly repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part^ thereof may not be the in operation either at all or in particular areas (4) Nothing in this (^) article shall ply (^) to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368 Right of Equ Judicial Review ln lndia
ity[4]
and legislature harm the Cons utional values and deny the rights. The judicial assessment is^ considered as a indispensable feature in the country. ln lndia, there is parliamentary^ form of demo acy where (^) every section of people (^) is involved in decision making (^) and policy^ ma ing process. (^) lt is true that the primary duty of the court to apply rule of law and is the groundwork of social equality. By (^) exercising new powers (^) of Parliament, rule of I which is to be applied by the court cannot be
separation of power^ and rule o law is judicial^ review. The influence of judicial assessment has been (^) so long nder Articles 226 and 227 in (^) case of High Court and Articles 32 and 136 of the Con titution of lndia for the review.[5] Mechanisms of Judicial Review
ln India, three aspects are covered by judicial^ review that are as follows:
These facets of judic
have to interpret legislation up interrupted. To^ achieve^ this^ en
on action re pronounced^ by the Supreme Court of lndia^ in ton of lndia[6], stating that the^ judges^ of higher court
in the Constitution is not disturbed.[7]
udicialdecisi dministrative
ial review we
equilibrium of control, specifi Judicial Pronouncements
rights under the lndian Constitt state of Kerala^ where^ six^ judge
five judges^ not agreed to^ amending^ the^ essential rti on. However, in case of Keshavanand^ Bharti^ v. ls out of seven^ judges^ held^ that^ Parliament modifying