

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
How to measure the plant pathogen
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Pathometry is a major tool for developing resistant varieties. Disease management through breeding resistant cultivars at forefront in countries where resource limitations do not permit high cost plant protection technology. Description of disease symptoms in standard diagrams, color plates and in words are essential for disease appraisal. Besides measuring diseased area, the counting of spores has been tried as an alternative method, especially for fungal diseases. Several workers have employed video image analysis for assessment of plant disease severity. Disease incidence, severity, and spatial pattern depend on data obtained from field samples. Linear regression equations often are used to characterize critical-point models where the independent variable is disease measurement and percentage loss in yield is the dependent variable. Plants can be evaluated for incidence or severity. Such models provide loss estimates for a given amount of disease at a given point in time or for any point in time when a given amount of disease is present. CROP GROWTH STAGES: A widely accepted definition of an epidemic is “a change in disease intensity in a host population over time and space” (Madden et al. 2007). This definition emphasizes that epidemics are dynamic processes with variable disease rates. How many of these disease rate changes are triggered by the host population is still an ongoing issue. As an epidemic is driven by the effective reproduction number (Cintron-Arias et al. 2009), which is the product of the proportion of susceptible tissue, the disease transmission rate, and the infectious period duration, any modification in the host population, whether quantitative or qualitative (distribution of plants or of susceptible organs), can have an impacton the epidemic dynamics. The host population growth is modified during the growing season by architectural features or by cultural practices. The production of new organ continuously modifies two aspects: the plant or canopy porosity, as well as the plant’s level of susceptibility when organ susceptibility changes with age (ontogenic resistance or receptivity). Indirectly, plant growth and structure modify the microclimatic environment inside the canopy, generating favourable or unfavourable conditions for pathogens. Organ susceptibility or the susceptibility period may also be modified by cultural practices disrupting crop-pathogen synchronisation. Spatial heterogeneity in the host population can also be generated by differences in phenology (e.g. variety,bpruning, sowing date) or growth rate (e.g. soil variation, vigour, rootstock). There is evidence that these variations within host populations do impact on disease incidence, severity or spread. However, those effects have rarely been explicitly taken into account in epidemiological models. Tracking back the impacted pathogen processes from the global dynamics of an epidemic, and then ranking the host traits involved in their modifications, constitute achallenge. we: 1) review evidence of epidemic variations attributed to plant growth and architecture in main pathosystems; 2) identify the pathogen processes impacted, and assess them in different epidemic contexts; and 3) explore the models able to measure and predict the effect of plant growth and architecture.Plant growth and architecture.
The architecture of crop plants is influenced by endogenous factors (hormone signals, trophic competition between organs) as well as by exogenous factors (light distribution, soil water, nutrients of organs, temperature, wind). For perennial plants, the crop density and the pruning type are defined at planting time, while significant changes in growth and architecture can be generated during the vegetative season by cultural practices. Some of these practices act on exogenous factors; that is the case for irrigation, fertilisation, root-stock and low density of planting, which have a positive effect on primary growth and ramification. In contrast, cover-cropping has a negative effect due to root competition for water and nutrients. Water supply and soil type modulate those effects. Cultural practices such as shoot pruning, topping, thinning and training will have an effect on endogenous factors modifying plant ramification and reiteration (morphogenetic process through which then organism duplicates its own elementary architecture in response to environment or damage (see this issue, Costes et al. under review)), thereby affecting the balance of young vs. older leaves, and exogenous factors, such as light distribution through an indirect effect on leaf density. For annual plants, agronomic practices play an important role in plant growth and architecture, e.g.sowing density and date, nitrogen fertilization, or the use of a growth regulator. But more variation in architecture can be variety-specific, since the endogenous regulation of architecture is under genetic control.