










Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
In depth analysis of the code wrt to corporate resolution in case of insolvency and procedure thereafter
Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research
1 / 18
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
In depth analysis of the Scope and Objective accompanied by the Comparative Study.
Research Questions
Time Bound Process Time Bound Process Insolvency Professionals Insolvency Professionals Information Utilities Information Utilities
Public Announcement Interim insolvency resolution professional Determination of the debtor's assets Debtor must submit a resolution plan Adjudicating authority Accept Reject Liquidation
Debtor –creditor Arrangement Inter- Creditor Arrangement Refraining from taking action against each other Protecting rights of the Individual creditors (75% of creditors need to agree for debt- restructuring)
LIQUIDATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS (^) If the adjudicating authority rejects the debtor's resolution plan as part of the corporate insolvency resolution process, it will order the liquidation of the debtor and appoint a liquidator to take charge of the debtor's assets and affairs. The liquidator will form a liquidation trust comprising of all of the debtor's assets and act as the fiduciary trustee of the trust for the benefit of the creditors.
VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION
LIQUIDATION PROCESS Rejection of resolution plan under S. 31 Passing of the Liquidation order Issuing of Public Notice
EFFECT OF RE-PRIORITISATION The code proposes radical changes to the prioritisation of creditors in the liquidation process and is a remarkable shift from the existing regime, under which some of the dues owed to the government and statutory dues take precedence over the dues owed to secured creditors. The re-prioritisation of creditors in relation to the distribution of the insolvent body's assets is likely to act as a major incentive for investors and creditors alike, since it substantially increases the likelihood of successful debt recovery.
BANKRUPTCY (^) In the event that the adjudicating authority does not accept an insolvency resolution process or if the debtor fails to adhere to its repayment schedule, the debtor or creditor may jointly or individually apply to have the debtor declared bankrupt before the adjudicating authority. (^) In this case, a bankruptcy nominee will be appointed, after which the adjudicating authority will pass a bankruptcy order. (^) A public notice inviting claims from creditors will follow and a list of creditors and claims is prepared. (^) Once the bankruptcy order is passed, the bankrupt's estate will be vested in the bankruptcy nominee, administered and distributed to the creditors in accordance with Chapter V of the code. (^) Thereafter, the bankruptcy trustee may apply to the adjudicating authority for a discharge order. However, the discharge order will not affect the rights of secured creditors to enforce their securities, nor will it release sureties of the bankrupt from liability.
OVERRIDING EFFECT OF THE CODE
SARFAESI act has been more favourable to the Creditors only as it provides for a situation when the creditor can directly recover money in case of defaults even without the intervention of the courts. Also the act provided for the non- performing assets and its accumulation which are the result of non recovery of debts by the creditors like bans etc.