

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
appointment and number of arbitrators section 13 of TOPA
Typology: Assignments
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Section 13 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 provides that when for the transfer of property, an interest therein is created for the benefit of an unborn person at the date of the transfer, a prior interest is to be created in respect of the same transfer and the interest created for the benefit of such person shall not take effect, unless it extends to the whole of the remaining interest of the person transferring the property in the property to be transferred. Unborn child refers to an individual who is not born yet or is not in existence and there is nothing in the law to prevent the unborn child owning property before he is born. A child in a mother’s womb is considered to be a person competent of the transfer. Therefore a property can be transferred to a child in her mother’s womb because the child exists but not to an unborn person who does not even exists in the womb of her mother. With every transfer of property, there is a transfer of interest which states that as soon as the property gets transferred in the name of transferee the interest is vested in the transferee. Therefore it is necessary that the transferee should be in existence when the transfer is made. This is against the very concept of an interest. There can be no direct transfer to an unborn person. There must be a transfer to a prior interest who will hold the rights in the property sought to be transferred for the unborn person until it is born or comes into existence. This is because of the rule that property cannot be held in abeyance. CONDITIONS to be compiled with under this section are: i. The interest of the unborn person must be preceded by a prior interest; ii. The unborn person must be in existence when the prior interest comes to an end;
iii. The interest created in favour of the unborn person must be the whole of the remaining interest of the transferor, that is, a life interest cannot be created in favour of the unborn person.[ABSOLUTE INTEREST] For example, if property is given subject to the condition that there should not be any change in the faith, it would be case of giving less than the whole of the interest of the transferor. A gift to a person not in existence is void under the Mohammedan Law and therefore Section 13 does not apply Mohammadeans. The rule in S13, Transfer of Property Act is similar to the rule in S113, Indian Succession Act,1925. Sopher v Administrator general of Bengal^1 arose under Section 113, Succession Act. The facts were the testator directed his trustees to divide his property into shares equal to number of his children and grandchildren and to pay the income of those properties to his sons for life and then to his grandchildren who survive their respective fathers, till they attained the age of 18. The grandchildren were then entitled to the property absolutely. The Privy Council, held that the unborn grandsons had to survive a double contingency, namely, they must reach 18 years and also survive their respective fathers, and that therefore the bequest was void. But the Bombay High Court in Framroze Dadabhoy Madon v Tehmina^2 held that the Sopher case cannot apply to transfers inter vivos, because S13 only provides that “unless it extends to the whole of the remaining interest of the transferor”, and not to the certainty of its vesting in the transferee. CHILD NOT IN EXISTENCE A child en ventre de sa mere , that is, a child in the mother’s womb is deemed to be in existence, as also a child adopted by the mother after her husband’s death. A transfer cannot be made directly in favour of an unborn person. It must be preceded by a prior interest in favour of a living person (^1) 1944 SCC OnLine PC (^2) 1947 SCC OnLine Bom