
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Solutions to homework questions related to the 'follow the money, follow the leader' article. The article discusses the roles of government as an initiator and creator (investor) and purchaser in nanotechnology development. It also explores reasons for state investments in nanotechnology and the disruptive nature of technology. Citizens' involvement in decision-making is suggested.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
1 - According to the “Follow the Money, Follow the Leader” article, what are the two roles government plays pertaining to the technological development? i- initiator and creator (investor) ii- purchaser 2 - According to the “Follow the Money, Follow the Leader” article, what is the reason for some of the states such as CA, NY, investing in nanotechnology? Economic development 3 - According to the “Follow the Money, Follow the Leader” article, what is the central building block in most state investment efforts on nanotechnology? Strong and reputable research program at a university or federal laboratory. 4 - What does the above-mentioned article mean by “the disruptive nature of technology”? Its ability to render billion-dollar industries obsolete very quickly. Fill in the blanks in the following questions: 5 - The “Follow the Money, Follow the Leader” article talks about the investment efforts in nanotechnology first by the government, then by the big business, and finally by venture capital. 6 - Langdon Winner in his testimony to Congress suggests that we judge technologies to be superior if the consequences of their use are reversible. 7 - In the same testimony Langdon Winner suggests that it is about time the society, the everyday people get involved in the decision making when it comes to what (nano) technological areas to be sponsored (by the taxpayers’ money). We can do that–he suggests–by forming citizens panels selected in much the same way the juries are chosen in cases of law.