



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The role of western education in the social transformation of women in India during the Bengal Renaissance. It discusses the depressing social conditions of women in India, the prevalence of Sati Pratha, and the impact of western education on gender dynamics in the domestic sphere. Notable reformers and their contributions to women's rights are also highlighted.
What you will learn
Typology: Exams
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Social conditions of women were very depressing in India. Most of the women were bereft of education and were married off at a very early age. Further, widowhood was considered inauspicious and thereby Sati Pratha was prevalent in the Indian society due to which with the death of her husband, his widow had to sacrifice her life too by burning herself on the husband's funeral pyre and such woman who sacrificed her life in this manner was called 'sati' or virtuous woman. Further, due to the patriarchal mentality being dominant in Indian society, the space of women was very confined and also the birth of a female child was considered a bane while on the other hand the birth of the male child was celebrated and considered a boon. Due to this toxic perception of the society, the position of women in the society was miserable. Even women's right to property were limited. However, in the Colonial era with the advent of western education and modernity, the social position of women was hugely impacted. In mid eighteenth and nineteenth century, the issue of women's reform came in the forefront in Bengal and this period came to be known as renaissance or the age of enlightenment. Notable reformers such as Rammohun Roy and Ishwarchand Vidyasagar raised their voice against this injustice meted out towards women for centuries but their reforms owed their existence to the conception of modernity, the British brought with them from the west and probably this is why this period of social reform was known as 'Bengal Renaissance' or 'Enlightenment' similar to the period of Renaissance that originated in the west in Italy and was responsible for the spread of intellectualism and freedom of thought and action. Transformation of the Gender Dynamics Roy tirelessly criticized what he saw as the idolatry and superstition of traditional Hinduism. He denounced the caste system and attacked the custom of suttee (ritual burning of widows upon the funeral pyres of their deceased husbands). His writings emboldened the British East India Governing Council to act decisively on the matter, leading to the prohibition of sati practice in
now not be maintained as suggested by nineteenth century literature that criticized the impact of western values on the domestic world. Also, westernization of India was heavily criticized, and the concept of ‘New Woman' became popular, as nationalist sentiments were on the rise. According to this concept, 'New Woman' shall be introduced to the certain elements of the materialistic world in a way that she does not juxtapose the ideas of the spiritual sphere but develops into a “classicised woman” who shall both be aware of social happenings and at the same time be confined to and preserve the ideas of , spirituality. There was an attempt to modernise women in a way that they do not become westernized completely as memsahibs of that time were and hence there should be a different way of westernising or modernising men and women. The concept of 'New Woman' was such that it should be different from the memsahibs in a sense that they shouldn’t give up the household chores but still be aware of the happenings in the materialistic sphere. Various texts were being produced during the time in question to enforce on women the new modernization and at the same time keep them strongly attached to the spiritual sphere of the household for example: work of Radhrani Laihiri. The concept of new woman came with new patriarchy and hence the concept of new spirituality and thereby new pointers of condition for a woman’s modesty. The new woman was allowed to travel in transport vehicles, be a part of social gatherings, etc. but this was permissible to them only as long as they dressed spiritually, ate modestly and kept the‘lajjasilata’ intact. Thus, the gender dynamics of the domestic world in India and particularly Bengal went through transformation two times and thereby two different ways, one being the initial transformation during which the imitation of the western ideas could be witnessed and the second time the gender dynamics transformed when the nationalism got fused with the question of women reform and their position in the society, here the criticism of western ideas became the determining factor in grappling with the loss of inner spirituality in the domestic sphere and the transformation that was suggested was the amalgamation of traditional values and western ideas while giving more importance to the former and limiting the application of the later to education and awareness. Role of Modernity in the Transformation As explained above, the entire transformation of the gender dynamics in the domestic sphere was stirred by the values of modernity and the views of British towards the Indian society that they claimed to be uncivilized. Additionally, Sati Prohibition Act, passed in 1829 by the then Governor General Lord William Bentinck, and the Child Marriage Restraint Act, passed in 1929, were all products of the modernist ideology of utilitarianism, i.e. greater good. The setting up of Christian Missionaries that imparted western education also played an important role in spreading western ideas that spurred social change in Indian society. Some of the most essential characteristics of modern education existed long before William Bentinck implemented laws for social reform. Hindu College of Calcutta, established in the year 1817, was providing liberal education in English. The Young Bengal Group, who functioned at the college, was likewise headed by an ardent proponent of western ideas, Henry Derozio, and the group was greatly impacted by western culture, as may be expected given their preference of western modes of dress and diet. Rammohun Roy who was also an inhabitant of Bengal was influenced by the western ideas that were flowing in Bengal and its educational institutions and he was also keen on promoting western education as Bentinck during his tenure as Governor General heavily
The partition brought with it bloody riots around the nation and a massive migrant wave. Millions of people fled to what they hoped would be safer lands, with Muslims fleeing to Pakistan and Hindus and Sikhs fleeing to India. As many as 14-16 million people may have been displaced in the end, travelling on foot, in bullock carts, and by train. For women partition even had the patriarchal mentality getting reinforced, huge numbers of women were raped, abducted and even killed by their own families before the aggressors could rape them or kill them since in this way if they were dead before their forced abduction or rape, the 'honour' of the family would remain intact which usually means the honour of men and those who weren't killed by their family had to convert their religion to the religion of the aggressors and forced to live their lives with their rapists as if they had no past and that this was the price for letting them breath. According to the nationalist point of view, the Lahore Resolution (also known as the Pakistan Resolution) was the first major demand for the creation of Pakistan, and this demand led to Direct Action Day on August 16, 1946, on which in various regions of the country violent riots occurred as a result of Hindus' agitation towards Muslims and Muslims' agitation towards Hindus. Due to this animosity, it was inevitable that the partition would occur. When investigated, the preceding argument does not hold water since although Lahore Resolution created Pakistan, a multitude of other causes brought the state into existence throughout the shifting Indian politics of the twentieth century. Lahore Resolution, Jinnah and Demand for Pakistan The Lahore Resolution advocated independent Muslim states in India with no mention of Pakistan or the partition of India. It was a way for negotiating for these distinct Muslim states within the Indian nation. Jinnah's goal was to obtain Muslim provincial representation within India and not to create a separate nation for Muslims through the Lahore Resolution; therefore he was just working to achieve this objective. Conversely, the word 'Pakistan' cannot be found anywhere in the Resolution, making the nationalists' claim questionable. Jinnah, who drafted the resolution, himself didn't want partition, but rather his primary objective was to secure rights for the Muslim minority in the country and that partition could even damage their standing because it was feared that, if the demand for the partition was raised, they would face aggression from the majority community. Furthermore, the partition was not something that was desired by the political parties. This is evident from the fact that even for the areas with Muslim majority; partition was not conceived fruitful as those who were powerful in the Muslim majority areas wanted to maintain their power this was only conceivable through increased communalism dominated by Muslims. The federal system guaranteed that their future was secure. Finally, in the year 1942, when the Cripps Offer was made, which offered an option to the provinces to join separate constitutional arrangements, Jinnah did not accept it, while the Cabinet Mission Plan (1946), which proposed a weak union
government with stronger provincial government autonomy, was accepted by him. Jinnah did not yearn for Pakistan and for the division of the country into two separate countries. Real Causes of Partition The colonial government's desire to gather Muslims under one cover was one of the main causes of division. The Morley-Minto reforms (1909) granted separate electorates to the Muslims for these purposes. This clause put restrictions on constituencies where only Muslim politicians may run and only Muslim voters could exercise their right to vote. The formation of a separate Muslim identity was highly unwise as the Indians who were Muslims had no connection except from being Muslims. Religious identities played a far greater role since Separate Electorates enabled politicians to acquire support on the basis of community identities developed along religious lines, and the identification of Muslims as a minority also increased in prominence. Thus, the Muslim League increased its support amongst the Muslims by offering to defend the Muslim minority. The Montague-Chelmsford Act, 1919 went on to finalise the process of the formation of distinct communities by faith. Many tensions among the communities came on the surface for example- the movement of cow protection started by Hindu organizations in response to the Muslim dietary practices that includes eating beef. In addition, when Congress became popular, it did not take into consideration the views of the Muslim League, which were the primary reason for Jinnah's anger at the Provincial Elections of1937, in which the Congress dominated the elections and had a large majority of votes. Also, Congress backed the notion that a strong centre was needed to safeguard unity instead of the Muslim League's call for a weak central and powerful Provincial Government. Thirdly, the idea of poorna swaraj became more important for the Congress than to first solve the differences that had aroused between the communities. Also, this idea of complete freedom was solely of the Congress Party and that Jinnah had no stake in it. Thus, between unity and strong center Congress Party was in a dilemma and finally decided to agree that division was inevitable. Conclusion As argued, the partition was not just an outcome of Lahore Resolution or elite politics at the center. The nationalist perspective is dubious on various grounds and the most startling being the absence of word 'Pakistan' as a separate nation from the Lahore Resolution and also nowhere the word partition could be found in this document. Further, the communalism warranted by Morley- Minto Reforms and Montague Chelmsford Reforms led to the enmity between the Hindu and Muslim community as several tensions between both these communities surfaced which also became the prime factor for the bloody riots during partition due to which several lost their family members and were even forced to live those who killed their families. Furthermore, the differences or disagreements between the Muslim League and Congress Party added fuel to the partition and due to these disagreements and most importantly due to the enmity between Hindus