Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Gottlieb v Tropicana Hotel - Law - Case Study, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Law

Gottlieb v Tropicana Hotel , Complete Strangers, Concentric Wheels, Contestant Wanted, Second Wheel, Jackpot, Casino Management, Simply Impossible, Factual Dispute, Nsurance Policy. Case study for law students.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2011/2012

Uploaded on 12/11/2012

amulya
amulya 🇮🇳

5

(3)

123 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel and Casino (109 F. Supp. 2d 324 (E.D. Pa. 2000)
$1 Million Verdict Against Casino for Failure to Pay Winner
July 14, 2000
Plaintiff a jackpot winner - finally
Jury awards Montco woman $1 million from casino
By Shannon P. Duffy
With the help of two complete strangers from Brooklyn, A Montgomery County woman convinced a federal jury on
Wednesday that she was cheated out of a $1 million grand prize she had rightfully won at the Tropicana Hotel &
Casino in Atlantic City.
Rena Gottlieb, a doctor's wife from Cheltenham, was a member of Tropicana's "Diamond Club," a free promotion
whose card holding members are entitled to one spin a day on the casino's "Fun House Million Dollar Wheel."
Gottlieb claimed that when she swiped her Diamond Club card and spun the wheel on July 24, 1999, the computer
game's three concentric wheels did exactly what every contestant wanted.
The first outside wheel stopped at "advance," prompting the second wheel to spin, which also stopped at "advance."
And then, Gottlieb claimed, the third, center wheel, with just six prizes, stopped at the $1 million prize.
Gottlieb claimed that other casino patrons reacted to her jackpot win but that the casino attendant quickly removed
her card from the machine and swiped another card, causing the inner wheel to spin again and land on a prize for
"show tickets."
Immediately, Gottlieb complained to the casino management and later that day filed a complaint with the Casino
Control Commission. Before she walked away, two women from Brooklyn, NY - Irma Galione and Anna Marie
DiMatteo - told her they had seen her with the $1 million prize and would be willing to testify if she ever needed them.
When Gottlieb sued in federal court, Tropicana moved to have the case dismissed, arguing that Gottlieb's story
couldn't be true since her account of the computer's reactions was simply impossible.
But U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle III ruled that a jury should decide since the factual dispute was a credibility call
between the computer experts and the eyewitnesses.
On Wednesday, after a three-day trial, an eight-member federal jury sided with Gottlieb.
Gottlieb's lawyers, Alan M. Feldman of Feldman Shepherd Wohlgelernter & Tanner and solo practitioner Thomas W.
Sheridan, said the jury's verdict was a great vindication for Gottlieb, who considered the casino's reaction to be an
accusation that she was a liar.
Immediately after the verdict, the casino's insurers agreed to settle the case for the full $1 million, Sheridan said.
Although the insurer's counsel had been present throughout the trial, Judge Bartle had decided that the jury should
not be aware that an insurance policy existed, he said.
One of the trial's dramatic moments involved the absence of a key casino witness - the attendant who allegedly
swiped the second card.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Gottlieb v Tropicana Hotel - Law - Case Study and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel and Casino (109 F. Supp. 2d 324 (E.D. Pa. 2000) $1 Million Verdict Against Casino for Failure to Pay Winner July 14, 2000

Plaintiff a jackpot winner - finally Jury awards Montco woman $1 million from casino

By Shannon P. Duffy

With the help of two complete strangers from Brooklyn, A Montgomery County woman convinced a federal jury on Wednesday that she was cheated out of a $1 million grand prize she had rightfully won at the Tropicana Hotel & Casino in Atlantic City.

Rena Gottlieb, a doctor's wife from Cheltenham, was a member of Tropicana's "Diamond Club," a free promotion whose card holding members are entitled to one spin a day on the casino's "Fun House Million Dollar Wheel."

Gottlieb claimed that when she swiped her Diamond Club card and spun the wheel on July 24, 1999, the computer game's three concentric wheels did exactly what every contestant wanted.

The first outside wheel stopped at "advance," prompting the second wheel to spin, which also stopped at "advance." And then, Gottlieb claimed, the third, center wheel, with just six prizes, stopped at the $1 million prize.

Gottlieb claimed that other casino patrons reacted to her jackpot win but that the casino attendant quickly removed her card from the machine and swiped another card, causing the inner wheel to spin again and land on a prize for "show tickets."

Immediately, Gottlieb complained to the casino management and later that day filed a complaint with the Casino Control Commission. Before she walked away, two women from Brooklyn, NY - Irma Galione and Anna Marie DiMatteo - told her they had seen her with the $1 million prize and would be willing to testify if she ever needed them.

When Gottlieb sued in federal court, Tropicana moved to have the case dismissed, arguing that Gottlieb's story couldn't be true since her account of the computer's reactions was simply impossible.

But U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle III ruled that a jury should decide since the factual dispute was a credibility call between the computer experts and the eyewitnesses.

On Wednesday, after a three-day trial, an eight-member federal jury sided with Gottlieb.

Gottlieb's lawyers, Alan M. Feldman of Feldman Shepherd Wohlgelernter & Tanner and solo practitioner Thomas W. Sheridan, said the jury's verdict was a great vindication for Gottlieb, who considered the casino's reaction to be an accusation that she was a liar.

Immediately after the verdict, the casino's insurers agreed to settle the case for the full $1 million, Sheridan said. Although the insurer's counsel had been present throughout the trial, Judge Bartle had decided that the jury should not be aware that an insurance policy existed, he said.

One of the trial's dramatic moments involved the absence of a key casino witness - the attendant who allegedly swiped the second card.

Gottlieb's lawyers were never able to depose the woman because she was no longer an employee and had moved away from New Jersey. But during the trial, another casino employee testified that the woman had returned and spoken with the casino's lawyers.

Sheridan said the judge grew angry and called a sidebar conference to chastise the defense lawyers for not disclosing that fact earlier.

But Bartle declined to instruct the jury that it could draw adverse inferences from the woman's absence. Instead, the judge said he would simply allow Feldman to make the argument to the jurors that the woman was begin hidden from them.