Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

FRS 102 Financial Instruments: Accounting - Factsheet 4 by Robert Kirk, Schemes and Mind Maps of Accounting

This document, written by robert kirk, provides an overview of factsheet 4 on frs 102 financial instruments, which discusses how to account for financial instruments. The classification and measurement of basic financial instruments, financing transactions, and directors' loans. It also explains the subsequent measurement of basic financial instruments and interest-free loans, as well as impairment, derecognition, disclosure requirements, and additional disclosures for financial institutions and retirement benefit plans.

What you will learn

  • What are the criteria for classifying financial instruments as 'basic' under FRS 102?
  • How should directors' loans be accounted for under FRS 102?
  • What is the subsequent measurement of interest-free loans under FRS 102?

Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

bartolix
bartolix 🇬🇧

4.8

(17)

304 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
FINANCIAL REPORTING
FRS 102 Financial Instruments - Factsheet 4 by Robert Kirk
FRS 102 Financial Instruments
Factsheet 4
by Robert Kirk
Robert Kirk reviews Factsheet 4 on how to account for financial instruments.
In December 2013, the Financial
Reporting Council (FRC) published 16
Staff Education Notes (SENs) to aid
users implement FRS 102. The SENs
were not part of FRS 102. They were
simply aimed at helping preparers
apply certain requirements of FRS 102
but they were not to be relied upon
as definitive statements on how to
apply the standard.
In December 2018, the FRC decided
to publish further guidance in the
form of Factsheets which should be
treated in the same vein as the SENs.
One of these (Number 4) is on the
topic of how to account for financial
instruments which is much broader in
scope than two of the SENs i.e. SEN
16 Financing Transactions and SEN 2
Debt instruments – amortised cost.
This short article will look at some of
the issues raised in the guidance.
Classification of financial
instruments
The factsheet lists cash and
investments in most ordinary and
some preference shares as ‘basic’
as well as debt instruments as
long as the criteria in paragraph
11.9 of FRS 102 are met. However,
there have been issues with this
restrictive definition and, as a result,
a number of instruments have been
classified as ‘other’ although their
substance was ‘basic’. To solve this
an additional paragraph, 11.9A, has
been introduced into FRS 102 which
the Factsheet emphasizes introduces
an additional principles-based
description which should be applied
if an instrument fails the detailed
11.9 criteria to identify if it could be
classified as ‘basic’.
Directors’ loans can meet the
paragraph 11.9 (a) criteria as the
contractual return to the holder
is a fixed amount of €nil i.e. the
interest free element is irrelevant to
its classification. However, the other
criteria in paragraph 11.9 may be
failed and thus there must still be
reasonable compensation for the
time value of money, credit risk and
other basic lending risks which is
unlikely to be the case for an interest
free loan.
Measurement of basic
financial instruments
Normally basic instruments are
recorded initially at transaction price
as adjusted for transaction costs.
There is one exception – financing
transactions - as follows:
Financing transactions
Where goods or services are sold
on credit there are two components
to the transaction – a sale and a
financing arrangement. These must
be accounted for separately as
follows:
The Factsheet also gives an example
of how the customer should apply
the transaction under Section 17
Property, plant and equipment by
recording the motor vehicle initially
at €13,500 with a subsequent interest
expense being recorded using the
same amortised cost methodology
as the seller. That provides symmetry
of accounting treatment between the
two parties to the transaction.
However, there are two exceptions
to that general rule:
1. Directors loans – small entities
only under Section 1A FRS 102
Loans to the entity not at market
rate from a person who is a
member of a director’s group
of close family and the group
includes at least one shareholder
in the entity – can measure at
transaction price.
2. Public benefit entity concessionary
loans – can measure at the
amount paid or received.
Facts: ABC Ltd sells a motor vehicle to a customer for €15,000 on 1st
January 2019, payment due in two years’ time. Normally if sold for
immediate cash the sale would be €13,500
Solution
Dr Trade receivables €13,500 1.1.19
Cr Sales €13,500
Dr Trade receivables €1,500 Use amortised
cost method to
spread income
over 2 years
Cr Interest income €1,500
09
Accountancy Plus March Issue 2019
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download FRS 102 Financial Instruments: Accounting - Factsheet 4 by Robert Kirk and more Schemes and Mind Maps Accounting in PDF only on Docsity!

FRS 102 Financial Instruments - Factsheet 4FINANCIAL REPORTING

(^) by Robert Kirk

FRS 102 Financial Instruments

Factsheet 4

by Robert Kirk

Robert Kirk reviews Factsheet 4 on how to account for financial instruments.

In December 2013, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) published 16 Staff Education Notes (SENs) to aid users implement FRS 102. The SENs were not part of FRS 102. They were simply aimed at helping preparers apply certain requirements of FRS 102 but they were not to be relied upon as definitive statements on how to apply the standard.

In December 2018, the FRC decided to publish further guidance in the form of Factsheets which should be treated in the same vein as the SENs. One of these (Number 4) is on the topic of how to account for financial instruments which is much broader in scope than two of the SENs i.e. SEN 16 Financing Transactions and SEN 2 Debt instruments – amortised cost. This short article will look at some of the issues raised in the guidance.

Classification of financial

instruments

The factsheet lists cash and investments in most ordinary and some preference shares as ‘basic’ as well as debt instruments as long as the criteria in paragraph 11.9 of FRS 102 are met. However, there have been issues with this restrictive definition and, as a result, a number of instruments have been classified as ‘other’ although their substance was ‘basic’. To solve this an additional paragraph, 11.9A, has been introduced into FRS 102 which the Factsheet emphasizes introduces an additional principles-based description which should be applied if an instrument fails the detailed 11.9 criteria to identify if it could be classified as ‘basic’.

Directors’ loans can meet the paragraph 11.9 (a) criteria as the contractual return to the holder is a fixed amount of €nil i.e. the interest free element is irrelevant to its classification. However, the other criteria in paragraph 11.9 may be failed and thus there must still be reasonable compensation for the time value of money, credit risk and other basic lending risks which is unlikely to be the case for an interest free loan.

Measurement of basic

financial instruments

Normally basic instruments are recorded initially at transaction price as adjusted for transaction costs. There is one exception – financing transactions - as follows:

Financing transactions

Where goods or services are sold on credit there are two components to the transaction – a sale and a financing arrangement. These must be accounted for separately as follows:

The Factsheet also gives an example of how the customer should apply the transaction under Section 17 Property, plant and equipment by recording the motor vehicle initially at €13,500 with a subsequent interest expense being recorded using the same amortised cost methodology as the seller. That provides symmetry of accounting treatment between the two parties to the transaction.

However, there are two exceptions to that general rule:

  1. Directors loans – small entities only under Section 1A FRS 102 Loans to the entity not at market rate from a person who is a member of a director’s group of close family and the group includes at least one shareholder in the entity – can measure at transaction price.
  2. Public benefit entity concessionary loans – can measure at the amount paid or received.

Facts: ABC Ltd sells a motor vehicle to a customer for €15,000 on 1st January 2019, payment due in two years’ time. Normally if sold for immediate cash the sale would be €13,

Solution

Dr Trade receivables €13,500 (^) 1.1.

Cr Sales €13,

Dr Trade receivables €1,500 Use amortised cost method to spread income over 2 years

Cr Interest income (^) €1,

There are a number of examples in the Appendix to Factsheet 4 which are identical to those provided by SEN 16 covering interest free loans between a parent and a subsidiary, between fellow subsidiaries and between entities owned by the same person. It also includes fixed term interest free loans between entities and their directors and an example of how to treat subsequent measurement of interest free loans.

The accounting treatment of a fixed term interest free loan between entities owned by the same person is similar in that the lending entity should record the difference as a distribution and the borrowing entity as a capital contribution. Another similar example provided in the Factsheet is that of a fixed term interest free loan between an entity and its directors. If the director lends money the difference is treated as a capital contribution in the entity’s financial statements and if the entity lends money to the director it is treated as a distribution.

Basic financial instruments –

subsequent measurement

These should be measured at amortised cost using the effective rate method. This ensures that the interest and transaction costs are allocated at a constant rate on the carrying amount over the life of the instrument.

However short-term payables and receivables due within one year, which are not discounted, are measured at their invoiced amount until paid or received. In addition, as long as a market rate of interest is charged and there are no transaction costs then the effective rate is equal to the market rate of interest.

Subsequent measurement of interest free loans

Facts

On 1st January a subsidiary obtains a two-year interest free loan of €50,000 from its parent. Assume market rate of interest is 5.4%.

Solution:

Impairment

Each reporting entity must assess at the end of each reporting period whether or not an impairment has occurred which needs to be written off against the financial asset. FRS 102 still uses the incurred loss model so there must be objective evidence of impairment. Possible future events is not a basis for recognising an impairment. Significant financial assets should be assessed individually but others can be grouped based on similar risk characteristics.

Derecognition

A financial asset should only be derecognised when it is settled or the contractual rights to its associated cash flows have expired. In addition, if a financial asset is transferred to another party i.e. factored, then it is only derecognised if the entity believes that substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership has been transferred. Otherwise the asset should be retained and any cash received treated as a loan.

Subsidiary’s books

Debit € Credit € Notes

Bank 50,

Loan 45,000 Initial

Capital Expenditure 5,

Interest Expense – Yr 1 2,

Interest Expense – Yr 2

Spread using effective interest rate over 2 years

Loan 5,

Loan 50,

Bank 50,000 Repayment

Parent’s books

Debit € Credit € Notes

Loan Receivable 45,

Distribution 5,000 Initial

Bank 50,

Loan Receivable 5,

Interest Income – Yr 1 2,^

Spread using effective interest rate over 2 years Interest Income – Yr 2

Bank 50,

Loan Receivable 50,000 Repayment