Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Theory of Fourier Transforms: Fourier, Cosine, Sine and Multidimensional Transforms, Study notes of Mechanics

An introduction to Fourier transforms, including their formal development, cosine and sine transform pairs, and extensions to multiple dimensions. It also covers the transforms of derivatives and their applications in solving differential equations. examples and formulas for the Fourier transforms of Gaussian distributions, box functions, and the solution of the damped harmonic oscillator.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

laurinda
laurinda 🇬🇧

4.8

(8)

220 documents

1 / 28

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Fourier Transforms
8.1 INTRODUCTION
When the method of separation of variables is applied to certain partial
differential equations of mathematical physics, integrals of the forni
rb
r(a) : I f(r)x1a, *1 a* (E ti
often occur. The function F(a) is said to be the integral transfsrrn of y'{"r}
by the kernel K(a,, x). The kernels associated with Fourier, Lapiace, Fouriei-
Bessel (Hankel), and Mellin transforms are
F(u): j" f -f(x)e''* dx (Fourier transfcrm)
F(a): !* f{*)r-". a* (Laplace transfbrm)
F(a) : ['o f G)xt,{ai ax (Fourier-Bessel transform)
(o -.J
(8.3)
(8"4)
(8.5i
r\0 ,J" /i.r).r" ' ,i.'
ara
(Mcllin transform)"
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c

Partial preview of the text

Download Theory of Fourier Transforms: Fourier, Cosine, Sine and Multidimensional Transforms and more Study notes Mechanics in PDF only on Docsity!

Fourier Transforms

8.1 INTRODUCTION

When the method of separation of^ variables^ is^ applied^ to^ certain^ partial

differential equations^ of^ mathematical^ physics,^ integrals^ of^ the^ forni rb r(a) :^ I f(r)x1a, 1^ a^ (E^ ti

often occur. The function^ F(a) is^ said^ to^ be^ the^ integral transfsrrn^ of y'{"r}

by the kernel K(a,, x). The kernels^ associated^ with^ Fourier,^ Lapiace,^ Fouriei-

Bessel (Hankel), and Mellin^ transforms^ are

F(u): j" (^) f -f(x)e''*

dx (Fourier^ transfcrm)

F(a): !* f{)r-". a^ (Laplace transfbrm)

F(a) :^ ['o f G)xt,{ai ax^ (Fourier-Bessel^ transform)

(o -.J

(8.3)

(8"4)

r\0 ,J"^ /i.r).r" (^) ' ,i.'^ (8.5i ara

(Mcllin transform)"

FoURIER TnlNsronlras Cxlp. 8

The Fourier and Laplace transforms are the most often used in^ mathematical physics.

8.2 THEORY OF FOURIER TRANSFORMS

8.2.1 Formal Development of

the Complex Fourier Transform The form of the complex Fourier series (see Chapter 7) is

where

To make the (^) transition / (^) - -, we introduce a new variable which is by

(8.7)

defined

t_ ftlt

":-T

where (Lk1n)/:^1 since Ln: l.^ Hence^ we^ may in the following forms:

f(x): i C{k)etk*^ Ak^ (8.e)

and

I^ f(x)c-Ik*^ dx

we obtain

f(x)e-tk* dx

(8. lo)

where (^) C(k) :^ lc,ln.lf

(8.1 l)

and

f(*) :^ l^ *c1t7"'o' at.^ (8.12)

There are several ways of defining Fourier transforms, but^ the differences among the various forms are not^ significant.^ To put^ Eqs. (8.11)^ and (8.12)^ in the modern form (the^ form most^ often^ used^ by^ authors), we let^ F(k)^ - -tfrcf-D and obtain

"f(x) :^ n=U_*rn'""'" (-/^ <^ x^ I^ l)

,,: (^) fi

['_,-f{t)r-''nx/t

6rv.

(8.6)

write Eqs. (8.6) and (8.7)

C,&: * I'

we let / --+^ co,

c(k): *r

If (^) f (x)^ is an even function of x^ [/(x) :^ .f (--x)1,^ then^ we^ see^ from^ Eq.^ (8.17) that the cosine transform is equal to^ the^ Fourier transform.^ If'^ however,^ /(x) is an oddfunction of x[f(x): (^) -f(-x)], then^ we^ see^ from^ Eq.(8'17) that the sine transform is equal to the Fourier^ transform provided^ -iF(k) is replaced bV (^) 4(/c).

The one-dimensional Fourier transforms^ of^ a^ function^ of^ two^ and^ three

independent variables are given,^ respectively,^ by

230 Founlrn TneNsronMs

Note that the Fourier transform^ of/(x)^ [Eq. (8.13)]^ may

F(k): hf _f(x)e'k'dx : hJ __,f(")t.os^

kx (^) f i sinkxf dx-

F(k, y)^ :^ h t-__tr*,^

y)etk* dx

f (x,^ v) :^ h I---rn, v)-tk*^ dk and F(k, y, 4 : h l-__tO,^

y, (^) z)etk' dx

f (x,^ y,^ i : h |-_-rn, y,^ z)e-'k* dk.

The corresponding cosine and sine transform pairs^ are

F"(k, y)^ :^ ^l+ (^) [-, tU,y) cos kx^ dx

f (x,^ v) :^ l+ (^) I*" o"u,^ v) cos^ kx^ dk

F"(k, y):^ J I-" tU,y)^

sin kx ctx

.f(x, y)^ :^ ^l+ I-,^

r"n, y) sin kx dk.

to Eqs. (8.20)^ and^ (8.21) are^ valid^ for

Cslp. 8

be written as

(8.17)

(8.1 (^) 8)

(8. le)

(8.20)

(8.21)

F"(k,l, z) and

and

Equations similar F"(k, y,^ z).

Sec.8.2 Theory^ of Fourier^ Transforms

8,2.3 Multiple-Dimensional Fourier^ Transforms

The one-dimensional transform theory may^ be^ extended^ in^ a^ natural^ way^ to

the cases of two-^ and^ three-dimensional^ Fourier^ transforms.^ In^ equation

form, the two- and three-dimensional^ Fourier transform pairs^ are,^ respec-

tively,

-f (x, y)s't"'*aYt^ dx^ dY t8.22)

F(a, B){tt"'*Ptt dudf

and F(u, (^) f,f : dpJ:- (^) [- [- -rr-.!,

z)ei6"pv'v4 dx ttv^ ttz^

/R,3\

-f (x,^ v, 4 :^ eh"J:- J:- J-- tt'^ B'^ v)e^

i'"'*p"n"t du df dv'

The generalization to^ the^ case^ of^ an arbitrary^ number^ cf^ dimensions^ is straightforward.

8.2.4 The Transforms^ of^ Derivatives

Fourier transforms, cosine^ transforms, and^ sine^ transforms can^ c.tflten^ be;

used to transform a^ differential equation (ordinary^ or^ partial)^ wtrich^ describes a complicated physical^ problem^ into^ a^ simpler equation (algebraic or ordinar;"'

differential) that^ can^ bL^ easily^ solved.^ The required^ solution^ of^ the^ original

differential equation is^ then obtained by finding the^ inverse^ transform of^ the

solution of the simpler equation^ (in^ transform^ space).^ In^ order^ to^ use^ th*

transform method to^ solve^ first-^ and^ second-order^ differential^ equations'

the transforms of flrst-^ and^ second-order derivatives are^ needed.

We now develop the^ transforms^ of^ first-^ and^ second-order^ elerivatives"

The Fourier transforms of^ first-^ and^ second-order^ derivatives^ wili^ be reprs-

sented by^ F(1)(k) and^ -ts(2)(k),^ respectively.^ That^ is^ to^ say,

pr,(k) :

h I-__ory),'r'^

u,. qu.2+.i

On integrating Eq.^ (8.2a)^ by parts,^ we^ obtain

F,,,(k): (^) -L{ f1)e,u,l (^) - ,k^ f J'tx)e'k'dxtl J2n1"''- l- 'J-" (^) )

231

F(u, (^) f): (^) *r "r ^ f(x,v): (^) +f (^) -f -

ik-* l-I

N /)-r.e^ J^ I-6\

  • (^) -ikF(k)

f(x)e'k'd.r

{a 1<\

Sec.8.2 Theory^ oJ^ Fourier^ Transforms^233

(8.3 (^) 3)

(8.34)

(8.3 s)

Ftz,(k) :^ ^l+ I^ "n#

sin kx dx

  • k2F"(k)^ (8.32j for (^) f(x) -+^0 and/'(x) *^0 as n^ -> oo' The choice of using the cosine or^ sine^ transform^ is dictated by the^ given

boundary conditions at the lower limit.^ The^ use^ of^ the^ cosine^ transform^ to

remove (transform) a first-order derivative^ term^ in^ a^ differential^ equation

requires a knowledge ofl(0), but a knowledge^ of/(O)^ is^ not^ required^ wher-i

the sine transform is used to remove a^ first-order^ derivative^ term.^ A^ kncwl-

edge of/'(0) is^ required^ to^ remove^ a^ second-order^ derivative term^ in^ a dift'er-

ential equation if^ the^ cosine^ transform is^ used.^ However,^ only^ a kngwledge

of/(0) is needed to^ successfully^ use a^ sine^ transform to^ remove^ a^ second-order

derivative term in a differential equation.

The relations for Fl')(k, y),^ Ft')(k,y),^ F!')(k,7),^ and^ F',')(k,y)^ are:

Ftu(k, (^) r) :^ l+ I-"A*D

cos kx^ dx

: l "l1kf(0)Y7t

: (^) kF,(k, (^) t> (^) - tf (^) ]Xo, O for (^) f(x, y)^ -' 0 as^ Jr^ -+^ oo'

t-T ^/|f'(o'il

Ft'(k,D: l+

I-"t#;Y) coskx dx

: (^) -k2F"(k, y) (^) -

for (^) f (x, y)^ - 0 and df (x,^ y)l|x^ '-- 0^ as^ n^ -> oo,

Ft (k,^ r) :^ J+ I-JJ*D

sin kx dx

: (^) -kF"(k, y) for (^) f (x,y) *^0 as x ---)^ oo,^ afld

F"''(k,il (^) - ^l+ (^) I-"a:##ilsin,rx r,

k2 F.,(k,^ y)

:4;kr(o'Y)-^ t-T

for (^) f(x, y) *^0 and d/(x, y)l|x'-^0 as x --+ oo.

(8.36)

FouRlER TRnnsronlts^ Cnlp.^8

(8.37)

(8.38)

8.2.5 The^ Convolution Theorem

In linear^ response^ theory,^ the^ general^ equation^ for^ the^ one-dimensional transform, Eq. (8'1),^ takes^ the^ form

F(a):lu,f{t)x{a,ia* : (^) J:_ K@ (^) - x)f(x)dx

where K(a^ - x)^ is called the^ response^ of^ the^ linear^ system,^ /(x)^ is^ the^ input (signal) to the linear t;J;,^ uni^ r(n)^ is^ the output^ (signal)'^ If^ K(a^ -^ x)^

: d(a (^) - x),^ then r(a): (^) J_-rf" - x)f(x)dx

whichisconsistentwiththepropertiesoftheDiracdeltafunction.Inthis

latter case, K(u^ - x)^ is^ called^ the^ impulse^ response^ of^ the^ system'^ When Eq'

(8.3?) is written^ in^ the^ form

l (^) l- rG F(x): f ^ g:-t-N-'.J.' - le6)^ dE

it is^ called^ the^ one-dimensional convolution^ (faltung-folding)^

integral of

two integrable functions^ il"l^ uta^ g(x)'^ The coiresponding two-dimensional form is f s:f^ ^f -f(x-t;x -^ f)sc'fid€dP'

Let F(k) and G(k)^ be^ the^ Fourier transforms^ of/(x)^ and^ g(x),^ respectively.

For these^ functions, the^ convolution^ integral^ becomes

-+ i-^ r@^ -r)g(o^ d(:hiI- -tn'lhJ-'{r')'-*"-n

dkidc

1zn J^ _*-

: (^) * f (^) -F(k)e-'k'

ou f (^) -s(oe'r.

d(

: :: f- F(k)G(k)e-tk' dk'^ (8'39) Jzn J^ _-,

In obtaining^ Eq. (8.39),^ we^ have^ tacitly^ assumed^ that^

the process^ of^ inter-

changing the order^ .ii",.r.",'"n^ is vaiid.^ The result^

in Eq. (8.39) is^ known

as the convolution^ theore-"f*^ fou'i"r^ transforms'^ It^ means^

that the^ Fourier transform (inverse^ ";;;i;t"D of^ the product F(k)G(k)' the right-hand side

Founten TuNsronus Cslp.

Note that both/(x) and F(k) are Gaussian distribution functions^ with^ peaks

at the origin.^ The^ standard deviation,^ width,^ is defined^ as^ the range^ of^ the

variable x (or k)^ for^ which the function^ /(x) [or F(k)]^ drops^ by^ a^ factor^ of e-t/2 :^ 0.606^ of^ its maximum value.^ For^ /( x)^ :^ Ne-"*n,^ the^ standard devia-

tion is^ given^ by

o*:-T:m,-^ A:c^ I For

F(k): ]:r-lvn",r/ zd,

the standard deviation is^ given^ bY

or:i-n/2e.^ Lk^ /=-

Note that A,x Ak^ :^ (z|Jfr)Q,Jfi1:^ 4.^ If^ u^ --+^0 (small), then^ Ax^ -'^ oo and Ak (^) -' 0. For d, --+ @ (large),^ Ax^ --^ 0 and^ Ak -> oo (see^ Fig.^ 8.1).

Figure 8. Exeupln 8.2 Find the Fourier transform^ for^ the^ box^ function/(x)^ where

i(") :^ {; f;i::,=^ ^

Solution By use of^ Eq.^ (8.13), we^ obtain

F(k): )r l-^ _trx)e'k*^

dx

: fo

I eik'dx

)_"

Sec.8.

A sketch ofl(x) and

JQ)

Theory of Fourier^ Transfornts

: l:lt)" */2nLik )^ " : l2sinka ^,17-E-'

F(k) is given in Fig.^ 8.2.

Figure 8. Exaupu 8.3 Find^ the^ cosine^ and^ sine^ transforms^ of^ /(x)^ :^ €-xe

Soltdion Using Eq.^ (8.15),^ wt^ find^ that

F"(k) :^ ^11 I-,t'.)

cos kx r/'v

/1 I" -^l Y 'lft (^) Joe*cosk-rd.r tTl |^ .

  • (^) ^'l ft\l I k'/

The corresponding sine^ transform^ is^ obtained^ by^ means^ of'^ Eq.^ {8^ 1{;!'

We obtain

F,(k) :^ ^17 l-"to)

sir, kx ctx

: tzf*^ _,. ^l +^ J ,'-'sin

A--r dr

la( *^ 't. -^l n (^) \l+k'l

Exauplr 8.4^ By^ the^ Fourier transform^ rnethod, develop^ the^ formal^ solu- tion of the differential cquation which^ characterizes^ the^ nrotion of^ ir dampeii harmonic oscillator.

Sec,8.

where

Theory of Fourier Transhrms

g(x, t)-> 0 and (^) X-*-- 0 (as (^) x -,---+ (^) *[oo)

e(x,o): .f(*) and^ u#1,=,:^ o

Solution Let

@(k, t): h I-__rO,t)eik*^

dx.

On taking the Fourier transform of the wave equation, we obtain I l- d2Q-",*,a":L (^) I 9i .- Jfr )--^ il'"^ u'^ J2n dtt^ J^ -,,9(x'

t)e'k' dx'

By use of Eq. (8.28), we see that the above equation reduces to

-kza(k,D: #t#a

where g(x, l)--+0 and |pldx ---0^ for x-- *-. In (^) other words, there is

no wave motion at _f oo^ (the ends of a very long string). The solution of the

above ordinary differential equation (since the derivative with respect to

only one independent variable (^) appears) is Q(k' t): cretkat (^) t cre-'g".

The given^ initial conditions will now be used to evaluate the constants

ct and cr. From g(x,0) -:.f(x),^ we obtain

o(k, 0)^ : h [-__rO,o)s-i*" dy I (^) i- t/ (^) --.

  • (^) -: 1 11ap-ik'^ d.Y ^/zftJ -* : (^) F(k)

:c1lc2'

The second initial condition gives

61r, o;^ :^ h f-^ _(#),-"e'ikx^

ctx : : (^) ikucr (^) - ikucr.

Fountpn Tn,cNsronl,ts^ Cnlp.

Therefore the solution^ in^ k-space^ is

@(k' r) :^ FU<) 'tt'* + Ff) '-'o"'

The required expression for^ g(x,l),^ in^ this^ simple case'^ may^ be^ obtained

directly by taking the^ Fourier transform of^ @(k,^ t)'^ We^ have

ll- eG, t): mJ __ a(u,^ t)e-tk*^ dk

: #"{+ J^^ -{'{o)''r')e'ikx

dk (^) + (^) +J-- rotol"-'o'1e-'n' dk\

or QG, t)^ :^ if@ (^) - at)^ +^ tfG *^ at)'

The above procedure^ for^ finding^ g@,t)^ from (D(k,l)^ leads^ to^ the^ desired

result only in relatively^ simple^ cases.^ IJse^ of^ the^ convolution^ theorem^ in^ the

expression for the^ inverse^ transform^ is^ the^ general procedure^ for^ finding

Q6, t)^ from^ O(k,^ /), that^ is,

s(x, t)^ :^ hJ-_.t0, t)e-ik'^ dk

:,JfrI"'I^! (^) f- oglr,kD.)e-ikx dk (^) + I (F(k)e-,k,,)e-,0, -- tl

  • rmt.f-- rror.^ G^ -^ o^ d( (^) + .l- (^) -ro)s-@ -^ o *j'

Here we need^ the^ original forms^ (in^ x-space)^ of^ eikat^ and^ e-ikut^ to^ obtain

g*(x-OandS-(x-6).Toobtaintheseforms,wetaketheinversetrans-

fOrms Of e,ku, and^ e-ikuc.^ Fot^ errr,, we^ find

g(x): hf _(eikot)e-ik^

dk

: -L f^ (^) "-,0,,-,,,41. Jzn )^ -*

  • Jfr^ 6(x^ - ot)- Similarly, we^ find that g-(x) (^) - ./fr,6G t ut).

242 FountPn^ Tn'cNsronl\as

By use of^ Eq.^ (8.28),^ the^ above^ equation^ reduces^ to

Since

T(k, t) :^ fs-ok't '

T(k,0): 1 :

h [--f{)"'0.^

o*

: (^) F(k)

Cn,lp. 8

-k2r(k,r>: (^) +'J*!

whereZ(x,')-0anddT|dx_+0asx--'*-(thetemperatureiszeroat the ends of the^ very long^ rod).^ The solution^ of^ the^ above^ equation^ is

the solution in^ k-sPace becomes

T(k, t) :^ F(k)e-"k".

The object is^ to^ develop^ an^ expression^ for 7(x,^ t)'^ Here^ we^ need^ the inverse

transform of^ F1k\s-"o",^ which can be obtained^ by^ use^ of^ the convolution

theorem, that^ is,

T(x, t): hf- -toO,

"tcztls-it"x dk

: _L^ i- rrorr., _ o d(.

J27t J^ _-

We need the^ original^ form (in^ x-space)^ of^ the^ second^ function'^ S@^ - 0'

It is just^ the Fourier transform of^ e-dk'zt^ which^ becomes

g(x) : j" (^) f

-(s-'t"'r)s-tt'*

dk'

lf uz :^ 2k2ot^ where ctk^ :^ dul,J1ot,^ then

g(x) '- (^) rJm^1 Ji* _-."^ t'-u'i2)s-ttu/'/-2dt"^ du

l-e-"/to'.

J2ot

Sec.8.2 Theory of Fourier Transforms

The expression for T(x,t) in terms of the^ convolution^ integral now becomes

r(x' t) :^ l+(h) J*-^ *r {tt'-^ "'^

1)! i ao'^ ct

: =-! f* fcl'*'c'ad d('

tJTtot J _*

The specific form^ of^ /(x), the^ initial^ temperature^ distribution,^ must of^ course

be given before the^ above integral^ can be evaluated.

Exauprr 8.7. By use of the three-dimensional Fourier transform method,

solve Poisson's equation for the electrostatic potential function,

Y'z$(r): __'+

Solulion In three-dimensions, we write

o(k): (^) # !_o{i,'"'o"

where d3r :^ dx dy^ dz (l'riple^ integral).^ The Fourier^ transform^ of^ @(k) is given (^) by

0(,): (^) #f-_ r,ut-,k',^ d3k.

On taking^ the Fourier^ transform^ of^ both^ sides^ of^ Poisson's equation,^ we

obtain

-k,o(k): -ry

o(k): {G;

where (^) f(r) -> 0 and d$ldr (^) -, for r --^ *-. The expression for P(k) is

P(k). dV [,.,p(r'),'u',t','.

Sec.8.3 The Wave Packet^ in^ Quantum Mechanics^ 24s

We conclude this chapter with^ a^ detailed discussion^ of^ the^ role^ of^ Fourier transforms in^ the^ foundation of^ quantum^ (wave) mechanics.

8.3 THE WAVE PACKET^ IN^ QUANTUM^ MECI{ANICS

8.3.L Origin of the Problem: Quantization of^ Energy

Prior to 1900,^ physicists^ assumed^ that^ the^ laws governing^ the^ macrorvorld,

together with^ the^ appropriate statistical^ considerations, were^ valid^ in^ the

microworld. This^ approach^ always^ led^ to^ an unsatisfactory^ theory of^ black-

body radiation (Wien's and^ Rayleigh-Jeans'^ radiation^ laws)'

The development of^ quantum theory had^ its^ origin^ in^ the^ inability of

classical physici^ (mechanics, electromagnetism,^ optics,^ and^ thermodynamics)

to account for the^ experimentally observed energy^ distribution^ (energy^ vs.

frequency or wavelength) in^ the^ continuous spectrum^ of^ black-body radia-

tion. In short, one is^ required^ to^ explain^ on^ an atomistic^ basis^ the^ color^ of

light that an object emits when^ it^ is heated^ to^ a^ certain temperature.^ A^ cor-

,..t th.ory of black-body radiation^ was developed^ by^ Planck^ (1858-1947)

in 1900. This theory requires^ that^ the radiated^ energy be^ quantized,^ that^ is,

E:hv, where Eis the energy ofthe^ radiation,^ v^ is^ the^ frequency^ ofthe radiation, and^ ft^ is Planck's constant. However, Planck^ attributed^ the^ quan-

tization phenomenon to^ the radiating^ object.

tn t905, Einstein (1s79-1955)^ further^ developed^ the^ quantization^ of

energy concept^ by^ (1)^ assuming^ that the^ quantization^ phenomenon was^ a

property of the radiation itself, (2)^ assuming^ that^ the quantization^ process

applied to^ both^ absorption and^ emission^ of^ radiation,^ and^ (3)^ using^ the

quantization concept to develop a correct theory^ of^ the photoelectric^ effect'

Bohr (1885-1962),^ in^ 1913, used a^ mixture of^ classical physics (mechanics

and electromagnetism) and quantization^ of^ energy^ concept^ to^ formulate^ a

satisfactory theory for^ the^ observed^ spectrum^ of^ the hydrogen atom. Bohr's

theory is based on^ the^ following^ three^ postulates:

  1. The electron in^ the hydrogen^ atom^ moves^ about^ the nucleus (the^ proton)

in certain circular orbits^ (stationary^ states)^ without^ radiating^ energy.

  1. The allowed stationary^ states^ are such^ that L: mur -- nh^ (n:^ 1,2,3,^ .)

where Z is the angular momentum^ of^ the electron,^ r^ is

"he

radius of^ the orbit,m is^ the^ mass^ of^ the electron,^ h:^ hl2n,a^ is the^ speed^ of^ the^ elec-

tron, and n is the principal^ quantum number.

246 FoURIER^ TRANSFoRMS^ Cn.lp.^8

  1. When the electron makes a^ transition from^ a^ state^ of^ energy E,^ to^ a^ state of energy E1,^ where^ E;)^ E7'^ electromagnetic^ radiation^ (photons)^ is emitted from^ the hydrogen^ atom.^ The frequency^ of this radiation^ is^ given by

Bohr's theory was gencralized^ by^ wilson^ and^ Sommerfeld^ and^ applied

to other atoms rvith lirnited^ success.^ By^ 1924,^ it^ was^ clcar^ that^ a ncw thcory

was needed to explain thc^ basic^ properties^ of^ atoms^ ancl nroleculcs^ in^ a^ sys-

tematic manner.

8.3.2 The Development of a^ New^ Quantum Theory

In an historic paper^ (1925)^ "On^ a^ Quantum Theoreticai Interpretation^ of

Kinematical and Mechanical Relations" which led^ to^ the^ development^ of

matrix mechanics, Heisenberg^ (1901-^ ) introduced^ a system^ of^ mechanics in which classical concepts of^ mechanics were^ drastically^ revised. Heisenberg

assumed that atomic theory should^ emphasize^ the^ observable quantities

rather than the shapes of electronic orbits^ (Bohr's^ theory).^ This theory^ was

rapidly developed by means of matrix^ algebra.

Parallel to the advancement of^ matrix^ mechanics,^ Schrildinger^ initiated

(1926) (^) a new line of study which evolved into^ wave mechanics. Wave mechan- ics was inspirecl^ by^ de Broglie's^ (1892-^ ) wave^ theory^ of^ matter,^ r1^ :

hf p,^ where p^ ir^ tn"^ momentum^ of^ a^ particle^ and^ ,2'^ is the^ wavelength^ of^ its

asiociated wave (matter^ wave). Schriidinger^ (1887-1961)^ introduced^ an

equation of motion, the^ Schriidinger wave equation,^ for^ matter^ waves and

proved that wave mechanics was mathematicallyequivalent to^ matrix^ mechan-

ics. However, the^ physical^ meanirrg^ of^ wave^ mechanics^ was^ not^ clear^ at

lirst. Schrtjdinger first^ considercd^ the de Broglie^ wave as^ a^ physical entity

(the particle, electron, is actually a wave).^ This interpretation^ soon^ led to

clifficulty since a wave^ may^ be^ partially^ reflected and^ partially^ transmitted^ at

a boundary, but an electron cannot^ be^ split^ into^ two^ parts^ for^ transmission

and reflection. This difficulty^ was removed^ by^ Born^ (1882-1970)^ who^ pro-

posed a statistical interpretation of^ the^ de^ Broglie^ waves^ which^ is^ now

lenerally accepted.^ The^ new^ theory^ based^ on the^ statistical interpretation^ was

very rapidly^ developed^ into^ a^ general^ coherent^ system^ of^ mechanics (called

quantum mechanics).

8.3.3 A Wave Equation for^ Particles:^ The Wave Packet

In developing a^ wave equation^ for^ particles,^ Schrodinger^ knew^ that^ (1)

Hamilton had established an analogy^ between^ the^ Newtonian^ mechanics^ of

E'-Er h