


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
It allows the respondent to talk freely about issues and does not constrain their responses through the need to ask / answer predetermined questions.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Brief Outline of Method This technique is used to collect qualitative data by setting up a situation (the interview) that allows a respondent the time and scope to talk about their opinions on a particular subject. The focus of the interview is decided by the researcher and there may be areas the researcher is interested in exploring.
The objective is to understand the respondent's point of view rather than make generalisations about behaviour. It uses open-ended questions , some suggested by the researcher (“Tell me about…”) and some arise naturally during the interview (“You said a moment ago…can you tell me more?”).
The researcher tries to build a rapport with the respondent and the interview is like a conversation. Questions are asked when the interviewer feels it is appropriate to ask them. They may be prepared questions or questions that occur to the researcher during the interview. The wording of questions will not necessarily be the same for all respondents.
Strengths / Uses of Method Weaknesses / Limitations of Method
b. The respondent may not consciously lie but may have imperfect recall. If you were being asked to remember things that happened days, weeks or months ago it’s likely that you would actually remember very little about what happened…
c. An interview can sometimes be a “second chance” to do something; having been given the time to reflect on something they did, the respondent tries to make sense of their behaviour by rationalising their actions. They are not consciously lying (since they will believe what they are saying is true), but their explanation for their behaviour, with hindsight, may be very different from what they actually felt at the time.
Criminals, for example, frequently express feelings of guilt and remorse for what they have done (which they may genuinely feel) and this may be taken as evidence they accept the values of the society in which they live. On the other hand, this remorse may simply be an expression of what the respondent believes the researcher wants to hear…
How easy is it to use a representative sample with this method? [Circle one option]
Very Easy
Neither Easy nor Difficult
Very Difficult
Briefly explain why you think it is easy / difficult to use a representative sample with this method
Although this method takes time and effort (since an in-depth interview will take time and make demands on the interviewing skills of the researcher) it is relatively easy to use this method with a representative sample.
How easy is it to generalise your findings using this method? [Circle one option]
Very Easy
Neither Easy nor Difficult
Very Difficult
Briefly explain why you think it is easy / difficult to generalise your findings using this method
The depth of (personal) information created using this method may make it relatively more difficult to generalise findings from a small group of people to a much larger group.
However, this may depend on the nature of the research and the type of questions used. If, for example, the research is designed to discover people’s opinions about something this would be easier to generalise than if the questions were directed at discovering something higher personal about initial respondents.