Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Focused (Semi-structured) Interviews, Study notes of Research Methodology

It allows the respondent to talk freely about issues and does not constrain their responses through the need to ask / answer predetermined questions.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

juanin
juanin 🇬🇧

4.7

(12)

259 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Sociological Research Skills Research Methods
Page
1
Name of Method
Focused (Semi-
structured) Interviews
Brief Outline of Method
This technique is used to collect
qualitative
data by setting up a situation (the interview) that allows a
respondent the time and scope to talk about their opinions on a
particular subject. The
focus
of the
interview is decided by the researcher and there may be areas the researcher is interested in exploring.
The objective is to
understand
the respondent's point of view rather than make generalisations about
behaviour. It
uses
open
-
ended questions
, some suggested by the researcher (“Tell me about…”) and
some arise naturally during the interview (“You said a moment ago…can you tell me more?”).
The researcher tries to build a
rapport
with the respondent and the interview is
like a conversation.
Questions are asked when the interviewer feels it is appropriate to ask them. They may be prepared
questions or questions that occur to the researcher during the interview. The wording of questions will not
necessarily be the same fo
r all respondents.
Strengths / Uses of Method
Weaknesses / Limitations of Method
1.
Positive rapport
between interviewer and
interviewee. Very
simple, efficient and practical way
of getting data about things that can’t be easily
observed (feelings an
d emotions, for example).
2.
High Validity
. People are able to talk about
something in detail and depth. The meanings
behind an action may be revealed as the
interviewee is able to speak for themselves with
little direction from interviewer.
3.
Complex
questions and issues can be
discussed / clarified
. The interviewer can probe
areas suggested by the respondent's answers,
picking
-
up information that had either not occurred
to the interviewer or of which the interviewer had no
prior knowledge.
4.
Pre
-
Jud
gement
: Problem of researcher pre
-
determining what will or will not be discussed in the
interview is resolved. With few "pre
-
set questions"
involved, the interviewer is not "pre
-
judging" what is
and is not important information.
5. Easy to record interview
(video / audio tapes).
1. Depends on the
skill
of the interviewer (the
ability to think of questions during the interview, for
example) and articulacy of respondent.
2. Interviewer may give out
unconscious signals
/
cues that guide respondent to give answ
ers
expected by interviewer.
3.
Time Consuming / expensive
4.
Not very reliable
-
difficult to exactly repeat a
focused interview. Respondents may be asked
different questions (non
-
standardised). Samples
tend to be small.
5. Depth of qualitative informatio
n may be d
ifficult
to analyse
(for example, deciding what is and is not
relevant).
6. Personal nature of interview may make findings
difficult to generalise
(respondents may
effectively be answering different questions).
8.
Validity
:
a. The researcher h
as no real way of knowing if the
respondent is lying.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Focused (Semi-structured) Interviews and more Study notes Research Methodology in PDF only on Docsity!

Name of Method Focused (Semi-structured) Interviews

Brief Outline of Method This technique is used to collect qualitative data by setting up a situation (the interview) that allows a respondent the time and scope to talk about their opinions on a particular subject. The focus of the interview is decided by the researcher and there may be areas the researcher is interested in exploring.

The objective is to understand the respondent's point of view rather than make generalisations about behaviour. It uses open-ended questions , some suggested by the researcher (“Tell me about…”) and some arise naturally during the interview (“You said a moment ago…can you tell me more?”).

The researcher tries to build a rapport with the respondent and the interview is like a conversation. Questions are asked when the interviewer feels it is appropriate to ask them. They may be prepared questions or questions that occur to the researcher during the interview. The wording of questions will not necessarily be the same for all respondents.

Strengths / Uses of Method Weaknesses / Limitations of Method

  1. Positive rapport between interviewer and interviewee. Very simple, efficient and practical way of getting data about things that can’t be easily observed (feelings and emotions, for example).
  2. High Validity. People are able to talk about something in detail and depth. The meanings behind an action may be revealed as the interviewee is able to speak for themselves with little direction from interviewer.
  3. Complex questions and issues can be discussed / clarified. The interviewer can probe areas suggested by the respondent's answers, picking-up information that had either not occurred to the interviewer or of which the interviewer had no prior knowledge.
  4. Pre-Judgement : Problem of researcher pre- determining what will or will not be discussed in the interview is resolved. With few "pre-set questions" involved, the interviewer is not "pre-judging" what is and is not important information.
  5. Easy to record interview (video / audio tapes).
    1. Depends on the skill of the interviewer (the ability to think of questions during the interview, for example) and articulacy of respondent.
    2. Interviewer may give out unconscious signals / cues that guide respondent to give answers expected by interviewer.
    3. Time Consuming / expensive
    4. Not very reliable - difficult to exactly repeat a focused interview. Respondents may be asked different questions (non-standardised). Samples tend to be small.
    5. Depth of qualitative information may be d ifficult to analyse (for example, deciding what is and is not relevant).
    6. Personal nature of interview may make findings difficult to generalise (respondents may effectively be answering different questions).
    7. Validity : a. The researcher has no real way of knowing if the respondent is lying.

b. The respondent may not consciously lie but may have imperfect recall. If you were being asked to remember things that happened days, weeks or months ago it’s likely that you would actually remember very little about what happened…

c. An interview can sometimes be a “second chance” to do something; having been given the time to reflect on something they did, the respondent tries to make sense of their behaviour by rationalising their actions. They are not consciously lying (since they will believe what they are saying is true), but their explanation for their behaviour, with hindsight, may be very different from what they actually felt at the time.

Criminals, for example, frequently express feelings of guilt and remorse for what they have done (which they may genuinely feel) and this may be taken as evidence they accept the values of the society in which they live. On the other hand, this remorse may simply be an expression of what the respondent believes the researcher wants to hear…

How easy is it to use a representative sample with this method? [Circle one option]

Very Easy

Neither Easy nor Difficult

Very Difficult

Briefly explain why you think it is easy / difficult to use a representative sample with this method

Although this method takes time and effort (since an in-depth interview will take time and make demands on the interviewing skills of the researcher) it is relatively easy to use this method with a representative sample.

How easy is it to generalise your findings using this method? [Circle one option]

Very Easy

Neither Easy nor Difficult

Very Difficult

Briefly explain why you think it is easy / difficult to generalise your findings using this method

The depth of (personal) information created using this method may make it relatively more difficult to generalise findings from a small group of people to a much larger group.

However, this may depend on the nature of the research and the type of questions used. If, for example, the research is designed to discover people’s opinions about something this would be easier to generalise than if the questions were directed at discovering something higher personal about initial respondents.