Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Federal Jurisdiction in Disputes with Citizens of Different States and Foreign Nationals, Slides of Civil procedure

The jurisdictional provisions of the u.s. Constitution and federal statutes regarding controversies between citizens of different states and foreign nationals. It includes examples of lawsuits and the application of the strawbridge rule for complete diversity under 28 usc § 1332. The document also touches upon the federal court jurisdiction and venue clarification act of 2011.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 01/30/2013

devpad
devpad 🇮🇳

4.1

(54)

81 documents

1 / 20

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
federal subject matter jurisdiction
diversity and alienage jurisdiction
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14

Partial preview of the text

Download Federal Jurisdiction in Disputes with Citizens of Different States and Foreign Nationals and more Slides Civil procedure in PDF only on Docsity!

federal subject matter jurisdiction

diversity and alienage jurisdiction

U.S. Const. Article III.

Section. 2.

Clause 1:The judicial Power shall extend

…to Controversies …between a State

and Citizens of another State;--between

Citizens of different States…and

between a State, or the Citizens thereof,

and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

Sec. 1332. - Diversity of citizenship;

amount in controversy; costs

(a) The district courts shall have

original jurisdiction of all civil actions

where the matter in controversy

exceeds the sum or value of $75,000,

exclusive of interest and costs, and is

between -

(1) citizens of different States;

(2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a

foreign state, except that the district courts shall not

have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an

action between citizens of a State and citizens or

subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted

for permanent residence in the United States and are

domiciled in the same State;

(3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or

subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and

(4) a foreign state ... as plaintiff and citizens of a State

or of different States.

is there federal statutory SMJ?

assumptions:

  • jurisdictional minimum in 28 USC

1332 is met

  • suit is under state (not federal) law

P (NY) sues D1 (NY) and D2 (CA)

under NY state law for damages in

connection with a brawl in NY

New Yorker sues Californian, who

impleads his insurer, a New Yorker

NY

CA NY

Californian sues a German

(1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and (4) a foreign state ... as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States.

New Yorker sues Californian and

Frenchman

(1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and (4) a foreign state ... as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States.

A New Yorker and a German sue a

Californian and a German

(1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and (4) a foreign state ... as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States.

German sues French citizen domiciled

in California and admitted for

permanent residence in US

(1) citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and (4) a foreign state ... as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States.

Californian sues Elizabeth Taylor, an

American citizen domiciled in France

(1) citizens of different States;

(2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign

state, except that the district courts shall not have original

jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between

citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign

state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence

in the United States and are domiciled in the same State;

(3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or

subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and

(4) a foreign state ... as plaintiff and citizens of a State or

of different States.

1) A from California sues B from

Nevada in Federal Court in Oregon.

2) A from California sues B from

Nevada in Federal Court in

California.

3) A from California sues B from

California and C from Nevada in

Federal Court in Nevada.

Baker v. Keck

(E.D. Ill. 1936)