



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
This study investigates the connection between bioclimatic architecture and double skin façades (dsf) systems, focusing on their shared strategies for daylight, thermal comfort, and natural ventilation. Insights into the components of dsf and their role in passive design, as well as the correlation between bioclimatic architecture and dsf principles. The text also discusses the benefits of dsf for energy conservation and the importance of these design approaches in contemporary architecture.
What you will learn
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 7
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
2018 , Volume 2 , Number 3 , pages 60 – 66
(^1) Faculty of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus E mail: sertac.ilter@emu.edu.tr
Different climates of different regions do not provide the required appropriate climatic conditions to ensure thermal comfort all year long. The goal to be pursued is to achieve the best interaction between climate, building and user behaviour. Bioclimatic buildings exploit climate in order to offer their occupants the most appropriate comfortable conditions. Especially, variations in hours of sunshine, in temperature, and rainfall of a particular climate signify establishing various strategies according to seasonal differences of particular region. In winter time assembling most of solar gain, and protecting the users from the cold (heating) are important. In summer; occupants/users need more protection from the sun (cooling). Thus, bioclimatic buildings reside in tune with these natural rhythms through consulting the most of natural lighting. This paper is aimed to enable architects to rediscover the principles of bioclimatic architecture and the modern technical and architectural means to achieve them. The study persuades adjusting the Double Skin Façades (DSF) design as the disciplined approach of ensuring the major strategies of Bioclimatic Architecture. Apparently, the study seeks three delineated bioclimatic approach daylight, thermal comfort and natural ventilation in DSF systems. The study views the DFS systems as the potential inclination for bioclimatic architecture ecological principles. On this basis, a connection between Bioclimatic Architecture and DFS systems are asserted and moderated within a generalized task. CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS (201 8 ), 2 ( 3 ), 60 - 66. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018. www.ijcua.com Copyright © 2018 Contemporary Urban Affairs. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction Decades, the energy consumption came to the agenda as an alerting paradigm of major global concern. In view this fact; the many researches have accomplished a novel interest in the field of ecological studies in order to provide enhancing approaches and strategies. The building construction sector has been notified as the major fact on energy consuming. Their operational energy is commonly supplied in the form of electricity, which is engendered from fossil fuels. Overall, studies reported that buildings’ energy use constitutes about one third of the global final energy use (G. B. Hanna, 2013). On this basis; sustainability spirit in architecture engaged with
Article history: Received 15 July 2018 Accepted 23 September 2018 Available online 13 October 2018 Keywords: Bioclimatic Architecture, Double-Skin Facades, Thermal Comfort, Heating, Natural Ventilation, Day Lighting. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution
the manifestation of “more efficient energy use”, where an allied relationship through the external and internal environment is adjusted to be asserted. This realm significantly influenced and correlated awareness on the selection of construction type and material use in architectural design, especially façade enterprises. In the explicit of sustainability beyond architecture has imposed various approaches in various scales of illuminating the ecological responsive allocation. Fascinatingly to address the main paradigm of efficient energy use in design; the bioclimatic architecture appears as the grounded approach that signifies the major spirits (natural ventilation, heating, cooling and lighting) of efficient energy use in building design. Following “efficient energy use” aim of the sustainability in architectural design; the bioclimatic architecture demonstrates a responsive endorsement on indicating efficient way of energy use as a cognitive tool for design. In view of this fact; its principles particularly reside along with a natural dynamic interaction between user, their built environment and the outdoor climatic conditions. However, the determination of bioclimatic architecture can be adjusted either in vernacular buildings, or contemporary buildings without any style or era distinction. In other words; any type of building belonging any time dilemma might be classified as bioclimatic. In order to call a building as bioclimatic architecture; the ecological dimension of the building significantly must met with energy efficiency perspective as naturally achieving the way ventilation, heating, cooling and lighting Olgyay V. (1953), Aronin JE. (1953), Arens E et al. (1981), Lima A. (1995), Singh MK, Mahapatra S, Atreya S. (2010). In recent; a significant interests has growth in Double Skin Façade (DSF) design and its usage due to its pragmatic benefits on energy conservation contributing to the energy efficiency goal of sustainability (N. Safer, M. Woloszyn, J. J. Roux, and F. Kuznik, 2005). In recent demarcation DSF is resided in the definition of multi layer skin construction of contemporary architecture where an external skin adjoined to an internal skin through an intermediate space of airflow (J. Zhou and Y. Chen, 2010). In significant; the efficient energy use ideology is resembled in DSF with evacuating the solar radiation absorb upon a glazing envelope, which enhances continuous ventilation within the building. As a consequence; DSF impulses a minimized energy consumption use amongst accomplished cooling and heating (Z. Yılmaz and F. Çetintaş , 2005). However, its implementation is accompanied by significant challenges due to the complexity of the thermal and airflow phenomena that is involved in its behavior where adaptability is magnified in different climatic conditions (M. A. Shameri, M. A. Alghoul, K. Sopian, M. F. M. Zain, and O. Elayeb, 2011). This paper investigates pragmatic deliberations of DSF for bioclimatic architecture as one of the most appropriate resided approaches of contemporary design. Thus, the study aims to fragment the DSF key parameters as a matching convincing tool for the design principles of bioclimatic architecture. The key parameters of DSF are demarcated within the framework of the study as daylight, thermal comfort and natural ventilation. The rationalized similarities between DSF and Bioclimatic Architecture are aimed to be met within a collective perspective. The questioned key primitives of energy efficiency in two correlated approaches are drawn to illuminate a utilized scheme as a convincing tool for design of contemporary era and sustainability.
2. Incorporating Bioclimatic Architecture and DSF Principles. 2.1 Bioclimatic Architecture Bioclimatic Architecture imposes evolving climate responsive implantation in architecture through the use of appropriate project strategies considering the climatic differences of each place, in order to better improvement of the thermal comfort conditions for the occupants (Lamberts, 2006). Based on the global demarcation of international policy- Kyoto Protocol on sustainability; the bioclimatic architecture is identified as the income for reduction of energy use and other environmental impacts in order to obtain sustainability as an outcome within the challenging decade of climate change (Hyde and Rostvik, 2008). In deed; the approach provides an advantage on climate to control the heat transfer process through the right application of design elements and building technology (Goulart and Pitta, 1994; ERG, 1999 op cit). The energy save has mainly promoted with the ensured comfort conditions for occupants/users into building. Extensively in spirit; passive low energy techniques are persuaded for generating environmentally interactive, efficient and contented to human comfort standards (Yeang, 1996). On this basis the bioclimatic architecture principles are developed on representing energy efficient
“ A double-skin façade reduces heat losses because the reduced speed of the air flow and the increased temperature of the air in the cavity lowers the rate of heat transfer on the surface of the glass. This has the effect of maintaining higher surface temperatures on the inside of the glass, which in turn means that the space close to the window can be better utilized as a result of increased thermal comfort conditions” (Compagno, 1995) Consequently; the buffer zone allows for increased use of the perimeter zone of the space that typically requires heating or cooling mechanisms against the exposed glazing. Also, with the use of improved solar heat transmission values for glazing the absorption and reflection of heat can be controlled to minimize solar heat gain. This can be accomplished through the use of what is referred to as ‘spectrally selective glazing’; Spectral Selectivity refers to the ability of a glazing material to respond differently to different wavelengths of solar energy – in other words, to admit visible light while rejecting unwanted invisible infrared heat. Newer products on the market have achieved this characteristic, permitting much clearer glass than previously available for solar control glazing. A glazing with a relatively high visible transmittance and a low solar heat gain coefficient indicates that a glazing is selective. Spectrally selective glazing use special absorbing tints or coatings, and are typically either neutral in color or have a blue or blue/green appearance. An ideal spectrally selective glazing admits only the part of the sun’s energy that is useful for daylighting (O’Connor, Jennifer with: Lee, E., Rubinstein,F., Selkowitz,S.,1997). Natural Ventilation Natural ventilation allows cooling and ventilating the space through the use of passive ventilating methods. The passive use of air currents plays a significant contribution on reducing the energy consumption of the building. Within this process; the exterior glazing of the double skin demonstrates a layer of air subsequent to the exterior wall of the building that is not affected by high velocity wind. This buffer zone as a key component to the double skin façade is typically the area admission by the occupants/users for natural ventilation. In some instances; the use of operable windows in the exterior glazing skin is also used for natural ventilation. “ The reduction of wind pressure by the addition of the extra pane of glass means that the windows can be opened even in the uppermost floors of a high-rise building. Natural ventilation of offices by fresh air is much more acceptable to the building’s users and it has the additional benefits of reducing investment in air handling systems and also reducing energy consumption.” (Compagno, 1995, p.
On this basis; a typical strategy of the double skin façade is to compartmentalize the buffer zone into separate regions with air supplied by grilles or vents at each level or individual zone. This compartmentalization disregards the impact of noise, sound, smoke and heat transfer from one section, level or room to the next area. The use of vents or grilles allows the control of incoming air by reducing air velocity, protecting from rain and reducing noise transmission from the exterior. Such control allows occupant access to the natural ventilation in constructions. “Most effective ways to reduce building services energy consumption is to exploit natural means and depend less on mechanical techniques" (Farmer, Graham and Guy, Simon, 2003). Extensively; the air cavity space and integrated solar shading devices control the solar heat gains that would typically require the use of mechanical means of air conditioning and air extraction. Daylighting Daylighting is important in two ways; first it reduces the amount of artificial lighting required, and secondly the quality of light from daylight is preferential to artificial lighting. The double skin façade with its increased glazing coverage improves the access to daylighting in the space. The increased daylighting component of the completely glazed façade initiates excessive glare and heat at certain times of the day. These increases require advance actions in design to struggle their negative effects. Solar shading devices are designed into the air cavity space to decrease solar heat gain through the glazing and reduce the amount of glare to bring forth by the increased access to daylight.
3. Findings The indoor environment is always under the intense of to be controlled for providing the users needs by the delivery of different building services such as heating, cooling, ventilation, and lighting. This can be explained from the traditional idea that meeting occupant needs on comfort and energy savings could be met by the formation of a static, ultimate thermal environment. Resembling the ultimate thermal
environment adjustment as the major gizmo; the connections on daylight, thermal comfort and natural ventilation strategies of Bioclimatic Architecture and DSF Design are utilized in below Table 2. Table 2. Daylight, Thermal Comfort and Natural Ventilation Strategies of Bioclimatic Architecture and DSF Systems. Throughout reading the indicated findings from the listed Table 2; the following issues are more extensively and preciously conducted in explanation. The daylight strategy intents to improve how natural light is captured and allowed to penetrate a space, and to improve how it is then diffused and focused. Controlling light to avoid visual discomfort must also be considered. The intelligent use of daylight allows the reduction of electricity consumption for lighting.
Retrieved on March 9, 2012 from www.edpenergy.com Farmer, Graham and Guy, Simon (2003). Visions of Ventilation: Pathways to Sustainable Architecture, Department of Architecture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Graha m_Farmer/publication/254955507_Visions_of_V entilation_Pathways_to_Sustainable_Architect ure/links/55e59e5308aebdc0f58a5563.pdf G. B. Hanna (2013). Green energy and green buildings in Egypt, Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., 3(4), 466 – 470. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/downloa d?doi=10.1.1.414.7838&rep=rep1&type=pdf Goulart, S. and Pitta, T. (1994). Advanced topics in bioclimatology to building design, regarding environmental comfort. Florianopolis: PPGEC- UFSC PPGEC-UFSC. http://kubanni.abu.edu.ng/jspui/bitstream/ 456789/6368/1/APPLICATION%20OF%20BIOCLI MATIC%20ARCHITECTURE%20PRINCIPLES%20IN %20THE%20DESIGN%20OF%20HOTEL%20AT% KATSINA%20NIGERIA.pdf Harrison K., Meyer-Boake T. (2003). The Tectonics of the Environmental Skin, University of Waterloo, School of Architecture. https://www.tboake.com/ds/double.pdf Hyde, R., (2008). Bioclimatic Housing Innovative Designs for Warm Climates. London, UK: Earthscan. https://www.amazon.com/Bioclimatic- Housing-Innovative-Designs- Climates/dp/ J. Zhou and Y. Chen (2010). A review on applying ventilated double-skin facade to buildings in hot-summer and cold-winter zone in China, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,14(4), 1321–1328. Lamberts, R., (2006). Bioclimatic Buildings: A paper presented to the Federal University of Santa Catarina. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.11. Lima A. (1995). The development of bioclimatic design. PhD Thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/The _Development_of_Bioclimatic_Design.html?id =6bXPSAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y M. A. Shameri, M. A. Alghoul, K. Sopian, M. F. M. Zain, and O. Elayeb (2011). “Perspectives of double skin façade systems in buildings and energy saving,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15(3), 1468 – 1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.10. Machaira, et.el. (2012). Green Hotelling: A Feasibility Study in the Hellenic Island of Skyros. Paper presented at FIG Working Week 2012. Rome, Italy. https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig _proceedings/fig2012/papers/ts03c/TS03C_ma chaira_labropoulos_et_al_6056.pdf Maciel, A. A. (2007). Bioclimatic Integration into the Architectural Design. Published PhD. Thesis. University of Nottingham, United Kingdom. http://www.labeee.ufsc.br/sites/default/files/p ublicacoes/teses/TESE_Alexandra_Albuquerqu e_Maciel.pdf N. Safer, M. Woloszyn, J. J. Roux, and F. Kuznik (2005). Modeling of the double-skin facades for building energy simulations: Radiative and convective heat transfer,” Building Simulation, 1067 – 1074. http://www.inive.org/members_area/medias/ pdf/inive/ibpsa/bs05_1067_1074.pdf O’Connor, Jennifer with: Lee, E., Rubinstein,F., Selkowitz,S. (1997). Tips for Daylighting with Windows; the Integrated Approach, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. https://facades.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/tips-for- daylighting-1997.pdf Olgyay V. (1953). Bioclimatic approach to architecture, in BRAB conference report No. National Research Council, Washington, DC. p. 13. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?tit le=Bioclimatic%20approach%20to%20architec ture&author=V.%20Olgyay&pages=13- 23&publication_year= Poirazis, H. (2004). Double Skin Façades for Office Buildings – Literature Review, Division of Energy and Building Design, Department of Construction and Architecture, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University, Report EBD-R— 04/3, 2004. http://www.ebd.lth.se/fileadmin/energi_bygg nadsdesign/images/Publikationer/Bok-EBD-R3- G5_alt_2_Harris.pdf Singh MK, Mahapatra S, Atreya S. (2010). Thermal performance study and evaluation of comfort temperatures in vernacular buildings of North- east India. Build Environment; 45(2): 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06. Yeang, K., (1996). The Skyscraper Bioclimatically Considered, London Academy. https://doi.org/10.1017/s Z. Yılmaz and F. Çetintaş , (2005). Double skin façade’s effects on heat losses of office buildings in Istanbul, Energy Buildings, 37 (7), 691 – 697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.07.