Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Exploring Bioclimatic Architecture & Double Skin Façades: Pragmatic Energy Saving Approach, Essays (university) of Urban planning

This study investigates the connection between bioclimatic architecture and double skin façades (dsf) systems, focusing on their shared strategies for daylight, thermal comfort, and natural ventilation. Insights into the components of dsf and their role in passive design, as well as the correlation between bioclimatic architecture and dsf principles. The text also discusses the benefits of dsf for energy conservation and the importance of these design approaches in contemporary architecture.

What you will learn

  • What are the key parameters of Double Skin Façade (DSF) systems that contribute to energy efficiency and human comfort?
  • What are the benefits of incorporating Bioclimatic Architecture and DSF principles in contemporary design?

Typology: Essays (university)

2018/2019

Uploaded on 02/01/2019

IJCUA_Urban
IJCUA_Urban 🇹🇷

4.9

(7)

103 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Contemporary Urban Affairs
2018, Volume 2, Number 3, pages 60 66
Exploring Design Principles of Bioclimatic Architecture
and Double Skin Facades as A Convincing Tool for
Energy Saving
* Dr. SERTAC ILTER1
1 Faculty of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus
E mail: sertac.ilter@emu.edu.tr
A B S T R A C T
Different climates of different regions do not provide the required
appropriate climatic conditions to ensure thermal comfort all year long.
The goal to be pursued is to achieve the best interaction between
climate, building and user behaviour. Bioclimatic buildings exploit
climate in order to offer their occupants the most appropriate
comfortable conditions. Especially, variations in hours of sunshine, in
temperature, and rainfall of a particular climate signify establishing
various strategies according to seasonal differences of particular
region. In winter time assembling most of solar gain, and protecting the
users from the cold (heating) are important. In summer;
occupants/users need more protection from the sun (cooling). Thus,
bioclimatic buildings reside in tune with these natural rhythms through
consulting the most of natural lighting. This paper is aimed to enable
architects to rediscover the principles of bioclimatic architecture and
the modern technical and architectural means to achieve them. The
study persuades adjusting the Double Skin Façades (DSF) design as the
disciplined approach of ensuring the major strategies of Bioclimatic
Architecture. Apparently, the study seeks three delineated bioclimatic
approach daylight, thermal comfort and natural ventilation in DSF
systems. The study views the DFS systems as the potential inclination for
bioclimatic architecture ecological principles. On this basis, a
connection between Bioclimatic Architecture and DFS systems are
asserted and moderated within a generalized task.
CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS (2018), 2(3), 60-66.
https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.4719
www.ijcua.com
Copyright © 2018 Contemporary Urban Affairs. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Decades, the energy consumption came to
the agenda as an alerting paradigm of major
global concern. In view this fact; the many
researches have accomplished a novel interest
in the field of ecological studies in order to
provide enhancing approaches and strategies.
The building construction sector has been
notified as the major fact on energy
consuming. Their operational energy is
commonly supplied in the form of electricity,
which is engendered from fossil fuels. Overall,
studies reported that buildings’ energy use
constitutes about one third of the global final
energy use (G. B. Hanna, 2013). On this basis;
sustainability spirit in architecture engaged with
*Corresponding Author:
Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Eastern
Mediterranean University, Famagusta, Northern Cyprus
E-mail address: sertac.ilter@emu.edu.tr
A R T I C L E I N F O:
Article history:
Received 15 July 2018
Accepted 23 September 2018
Available online 13 October
2018
Keywords:
Bioclimatic
Architecture,
Double-Skin Facades,
Thermal Comfort,
Heating,
Natural Ventilation,
Day Lighting.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution
- NonCommercial - NoDerivs 4.0.
"CC-BY-NC-ND"
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Exploring Bioclimatic Architecture & Double Skin Façades: Pragmatic Energy Saving Approach and more Essays (university) Urban planning in PDF only on Docsity!

Contemporary Urban Affairs

2018 , Volume 2 , Number 3 , pages 60 – 66

Exploring Design Principles of Bioclimatic Architecture

and Double Skin Facades as A Convincing Tool for

Energy Saving

* Dr. SERTAC ILTER^1

(^1) Faculty of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus E mail: sertac.ilter@emu.edu.tr

A B S T R A C T

Different climates of different regions do not provide the required appropriate climatic conditions to ensure thermal comfort all year long. The goal to be pursued is to achieve the best interaction between climate, building and user behaviour. Bioclimatic buildings exploit climate in order to offer their occupants the most appropriate comfortable conditions. Especially, variations in hours of sunshine, in temperature, and rainfall of a particular climate signify establishing various strategies according to seasonal differences of particular region. In winter time assembling most of solar gain, and protecting the users from the cold (heating) are important. In summer; occupants/users need more protection from the sun (cooling). Thus, bioclimatic buildings reside in tune with these natural rhythms through consulting the most of natural lighting. This paper is aimed to enable architects to rediscover the principles of bioclimatic architecture and the modern technical and architectural means to achieve them. The study persuades adjusting the Double Skin Façades (DSF) design as the disciplined approach of ensuring the major strategies of Bioclimatic Architecture. Apparently, the study seeks three delineated bioclimatic approach daylight, thermal comfort and natural ventilation in DSF systems. The study views the DFS systems as the potential inclination for bioclimatic architecture ecological principles. On this basis, a connection between Bioclimatic Architecture and DFS systems are asserted and moderated within a generalized task. CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS (201 8 ), 2 ( 3 ), 60 - 66. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018. www.ijcua.com Copyright © 2018 Contemporary Urban Affairs. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction Decades, the energy consumption came to the agenda as an alerting paradigm of major global concern. In view this fact; the many researches have accomplished a novel interest in the field of ecological studies in order to provide enhancing approaches and strategies. The building construction sector has been notified as the major fact on energy consuming. Their operational energy is commonly supplied in the form of electricity, which is engendered from fossil fuels. Overall, studies reported that buildings’ energy use constitutes about one third of the global final energy use (G. B. Hanna, 2013). On this basis; sustainability spirit in architecture engaged with

  • Corresponding Author: Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, Northern Cyprus E-mail address: sertac.ilter@emu.edu.tr

A R T I C L E I N F O:

Article history: Received 15 July 2018 Accepted 23 September 2018 Available online 13 October 2018 Keywords: Bioclimatic Architecture, Double-Skin Facades, Thermal Comfort, Heating, Natural Ventilation, Day Lighting. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution

  • NonCommercial - NoDerivs 4.0. "CC-BY-NC-ND"

the manifestation of “more efficient energy use”, where an allied relationship through the external and internal environment is adjusted to be asserted. This realm significantly influenced and correlated awareness on the selection of construction type and material use in architectural design, especially façade enterprises. In the explicit of sustainability beyond architecture has imposed various approaches in various scales of illuminating the ecological responsive allocation. Fascinatingly to address the main paradigm of efficient energy use in design; the bioclimatic architecture appears as the grounded approach that signifies the major spirits (natural ventilation, heating, cooling and lighting) of efficient energy use in building design. Following “efficient energy use” aim of the sustainability in architectural design; the bioclimatic architecture demonstrates a responsive endorsement on indicating efficient way of energy use as a cognitive tool for design. In view of this fact; its principles particularly reside along with a natural dynamic interaction between user, their built environment and the outdoor climatic conditions. However, the determination of bioclimatic architecture can be adjusted either in vernacular buildings, or contemporary buildings without any style or era distinction. In other words; any type of building belonging any time dilemma might be classified as bioclimatic. In order to call a building as bioclimatic architecture; the ecological dimension of the building significantly must met with energy efficiency perspective as naturally achieving the way ventilation, heating, cooling and lighting Olgyay V. (1953), Aronin JE. (1953), Arens E et al. (1981), Lima A. (1995), Singh MK, Mahapatra S, Atreya S. (2010). In recent; a significant interests has growth in Double Skin Façade (DSF) design and its usage due to its pragmatic benefits on energy conservation contributing to the energy efficiency goal of sustainability (N. Safer, M. Woloszyn, J. J. Roux, and F. Kuznik, 2005). In recent demarcation DSF is resided in the definition of multi layer skin construction of contemporary architecture where an external skin adjoined to an internal skin through an intermediate space of airflow (J. Zhou and Y. Chen, 2010). In significant; the efficient energy use ideology is resembled in DSF with evacuating the solar radiation absorb upon a glazing envelope, which enhances continuous ventilation within the building. As a consequence; DSF impulses a minimized energy consumption use amongst accomplished cooling and heating (Z. Yılmaz and F. Çetintaş , 2005). However, its implementation is accompanied by significant challenges due to the complexity of the thermal and airflow phenomena that is involved in its behavior where adaptability is magnified in different climatic conditions (M. A. Shameri, M. A. Alghoul, K. Sopian, M. F. M. Zain, and O. Elayeb, 2011). This paper investigates pragmatic deliberations of DSF for bioclimatic architecture as one of the most appropriate resided approaches of contemporary design. Thus, the study aims to fragment the DSF key parameters as a matching convincing tool for the design principles of bioclimatic architecture. The key parameters of DSF are demarcated within the framework of the study as daylight, thermal comfort and natural ventilation. The rationalized similarities between DSF and Bioclimatic Architecture are aimed to be met within a collective perspective. The questioned key primitives of energy efficiency in two correlated approaches are drawn to illuminate a utilized scheme as a convincing tool for design of contemporary era and sustainability.

2. Incorporating Bioclimatic Architecture and DSF Principles. 2.1 Bioclimatic Architecture Bioclimatic Architecture imposes evolving climate responsive implantation in architecture through the use of appropriate project strategies considering the climatic differences of each place, in order to better improvement of the thermal comfort conditions for the occupants (Lamberts, 2006). Based on the global demarcation of international policy- Kyoto Protocol on sustainability; the bioclimatic architecture is identified as the income for reduction of energy use and other environmental impacts in order to obtain sustainability as an outcome within the challenging decade of climate change (Hyde and Rostvik, 2008). In deed; the approach provides an advantage on climate to control the heat transfer process through the right application of design elements and building technology (Goulart and Pitta, 1994; ERG, 1999 op cit). The energy save has mainly promoted with the ensured comfort conditions for occupants/users into building. Extensively in spirit; passive low energy techniques are persuaded for generating environmentally interactive, efficient and contented to human comfort standards (Yeang, 1996). On this basis the bioclimatic architecture principles are developed on representing energy efficient

A double-skin façade reduces heat losses because the reduced speed of the air flow and the increased temperature of the air in the cavity lowers the rate of heat transfer on the surface of the glass. This has the effect of maintaining higher surface temperatures on the inside of the glass, which in turn means that the space close to the window can be better utilized as a result of increased thermal comfort conditions” (Compagno, 1995) Consequently; the buffer zone allows for increased use of the perimeter zone of the space that typically requires heating or cooling mechanisms against the exposed glazing. Also, with the use of improved solar heat transmission values for glazing the absorption and reflection of heat can be controlled to minimize solar heat gain. This can be accomplished through the use of what is referred to as ‘spectrally selective glazing’; Spectral Selectivity refers to the ability of a glazing material to respond differently to different wavelengths of solar energy – in other words, to admit visible light while rejecting unwanted invisible infrared heat. Newer products on the market have achieved this characteristic, permitting much clearer glass than previously available for solar control glazing. A glazing with a relatively high visible transmittance and a low solar heat gain coefficient indicates that a glazing is selective. Spectrally selective glazing use special absorbing tints or coatings, and are typically either neutral in color or have a blue or blue/green appearance. An ideal spectrally selective glazing admits only the part of the sun’s energy that is useful for daylighting (O’Connor, Jennifer with: Lee, E., Rubinstein,F., Selkowitz,S.,1997). Natural Ventilation Natural ventilation allows cooling and ventilating the space through the use of passive ventilating methods. The passive use of air currents plays a significant contribution on reducing the energy consumption of the building. Within this process; the exterior glazing of the double skin demonstrates a layer of air subsequent to the exterior wall of the building that is not affected by high velocity wind. This buffer zone as a key component to the double skin façade is typically the area admission by the occupants/users for natural ventilation. In some instances; the use of operable windows in the exterior glazing skin is also used for natural ventilation. “ The reduction of wind pressure by the addition of the extra pane of glass means that the windows can be opened even in the uppermost floors of a high-rise building. Natural ventilation of offices by fresh air is much more acceptable to the building’s users and it has the additional benefits of reducing investment in air handling systems and also reducing energy consumption.” (Compagno, 1995, p.

On this basis; a typical strategy of the double skin façade is to compartmentalize the buffer zone into separate regions with air supplied by grilles or vents at each level or individual zone. This compartmentalization disregards the impact of noise, sound, smoke and heat transfer from one section, level or room to the next area. The use of vents or grilles allows the control of incoming air by reducing air velocity, protecting from rain and reducing noise transmission from the exterior. Such control allows occupant access to the natural ventilation in constructions. “Most effective ways to reduce building services energy consumption is to exploit natural means and depend less on mechanical techniques" (Farmer, Graham and Guy, Simon, 2003). Extensively; the air cavity space and integrated solar shading devices control the solar heat gains that would typically require the use of mechanical means of air conditioning and air extraction. Daylighting Daylighting is important in two ways; first it reduces the amount of artificial lighting required, and secondly the quality of light from daylight is preferential to artificial lighting. The double skin façade with its increased glazing coverage improves the access to daylighting in the space. The increased daylighting component of the completely glazed façade initiates excessive glare and heat at certain times of the day. These increases require advance actions in design to struggle their negative effects. Solar shading devices are designed into the air cavity space to decrease solar heat gain through the glazing and reduce the amount of glare to bring forth by the increased access to daylight.

3. Findings The indoor environment is always under the intense of to be controlled for providing the users needs by the delivery of different building services such as heating, cooling, ventilation, and lighting. This can be explained from the traditional idea that meeting occupant needs on comfort and energy savings could be met by the formation of a static, ultimate thermal environment. Resembling the ultimate thermal

environment adjustment as the major gizmo; the connections on daylight, thermal comfort and natural ventilation strategies of Bioclimatic Architecture and DSF Design are utilized in below Table 2. Table 2. Daylight, Thermal Comfort and Natural Ventilation Strategies of Bioclimatic Architecture and DSF Systems. Throughout reading the indicated findings from the listed Table 2; the following issues are more extensively and preciously conducted in explanation. The daylight strategy intents to improve how natural light is captured and allowed to penetrate a space, and to improve how it is then diffused and focused. Controlling light to avoid visual discomfort must also be considered. The intelligent use of daylight allows the reduction of electricity consumption for lighting.

  • Shading and Control: Excessive daylight penetration can cause visual discomfort. This can be controlled by architectural features like canopies, overhangs and reflectors in Bioclimatic Architecture, and with fixed or movable shading devices which contained in air cavity or exterior layer of DSF systems.
  • Capturing: Windows into spaces convey a certain amount of daylight. This can be available in Bioclimatic Architecture with designing required size of windows and reflective surfaces on the ground such as, water elements or paving and also fully glazed transparent surfaces may contribute to capturing more light in DSF systems.
    • Penetration: The way daylight penetrates into spaces depending on the position, orientation, angle, size and type of glazing which are necessary circumstances for Bioclimatic Architecture, but DSF systems can occur penetration of daylight by fully glazed exterior of interior layer.
    • Distribution: Daylight can be diffused by an appropriate type of glazing usage or by reflectors that allow light for penetration, both in Bioclimatic Architecture and DSF systems. The thermal comfort strategy is a response predominantly to winter comfort: capturing the heat from solar radiation, storing it in the mass of the structure.
    • Heat capturing: Capturing heat in Bioclimatic Architecture comprises of storing solar energy and converting into heat. The solar radiation received by a structure depends on climate together with the orientation of the building, the nature of its surfaces and the materials used, on the topography of the site and glazed surfaces. In DSF systems, orientation of DSF, directs heat gain and transmits diffused solar radiation through glazed layers that can capture heat.
    • Storage: Heat storage can be accomplished with materials among accumulating heat capacity and absorptive double-glazing for DSF systems.
    • Retention: Retention is the air-tightness of the building’s skin together with the insulation properties of its walls that reduce heat loss in Bioclimatic Architecture; dividing a structure into different spaces for creating a distinct temperature zones. Same idea can be used in DSF systems by compartmenting the air cavity into separated regions with air supplied by grills or vents.
    • Distribution: Distribution means conveying the air to the spaces. Air (heat) can be distributed with the thermo-circulation of the air (rising movement of warm air). This can be achieved through the air cavity that DSF systems contain where raised air must also be regulated according to the spatial needs and usage that Bioclimatic Architecture claims. The natural ventilation strategy is a response to the requirements for summer comfort: shading from solar radiation, dissipating excess heat and cooling down naturally.
    • Shading: Bioclimatic Architecture essentially sets the external shading screens,

Retrieved on March 9, 2012 from www.edpenergy.com Farmer, Graham and Guy, Simon (2003). Visions of Ventilation: Pathways to Sustainable Architecture, Department of Architecture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Graha m_Farmer/publication/254955507_Visions_of_V entilation_Pathways_to_Sustainable_Architect ure/links/55e59e5308aebdc0f58a5563.pdf G. B. Hanna (2013). Green energy and green buildings in Egypt, Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., 3(4), 466 – 470. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/downloa d?doi=10.1.1.414.7838&rep=rep1&type=pdf Goulart, S. and Pitta, T. (1994). Advanced topics in bioclimatology to building design, regarding environmental comfort. Florianopolis: PPGEC- UFSC PPGEC-UFSC. http://kubanni.abu.edu.ng/jspui/bitstream/ 456789/6368/1/APPLICATION%20OF%20BIOCLI MATIC%20ARCHITECTURE%20PRINCIPLES%20IN %20THE%20DESIGN%20OF%20HOTEL%20AT% KATSINA%20NIGERIA.pdf Harrison K., Meyer-Boake T. (2003). The Tectonics of the Environmental Skin, University of Waterloo, School of Architecture. https://www.tboake.com/ds/double.pdf Hyde, R., (2008). Bioclimatic Housing Innovative Designs for Warm Climates. London, UK: Earthscan. https://www.amazon.com/Bioclimatic- Housing-Innovative-Designs- Climates/dp/ J. Zhou and Y. Chen (2010). A review on applying ventilated double-skin facade to buildings in hot-summer and cold-winter zone in China, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,14(4), 1321–1328. Lamberts, R., (2006). Bioclimatic Buildings: A paper presented to the Federal University of Santa Catarina. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.11. Lima A. (1995). The development of bioclimatic design. PhD Thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/The _Development_of_Bioclimatic_Design.html?id =6bXPSAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y M. A. Shameri, M. A. Alghoul, K. Sopian, M. F. M. Zain, and O. Elayeb (2011). “Perspectives of double skin façade systems in buildings and energy saving,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15(3), 1468 – 1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.10. Machaira, et.el. (2012). Green Hotelling: A Feasibility Study in the Hellenic Island of Skyros. Paper presented at FIG Working Week 2012. Rome, Italy. https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig _proceedings/fig2012/papers/ts03c/TS03C_ma chaira_labropoulos_et_al_6056.pdf Maciel, A. A. (2007). Bioclimatic Integration into the Architectural Design. Published PhD. Thesis. University of Nottingham, United Kingdom. http://www.labeee.ufsc.br/sites/default/files/p ublicacoes/teses/TESE_Alexandra_Albuquerqu e_Maciel.pdf N. Safer, M. Woloszyn, J. J. Roux, and F. Kuznik (2005). Modeling of the double-skin facades for building energy simulations: Radiative and convective heat transfer,” Building Simulation, 1067 – 1074. http://www.inive.org/members_area/medias/ pdf/inive/ibpsa/bs05_1067_1074.pdf O’Connor, Jennifer with: Lee, E., Rubinstein,F., Selkowitz,S. (1997). Tips for Daylighting with Windows; the Integrated Approach, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. https://facades.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/tips-for- daylighting-1997.pdf Olgyay V. (1953). Bioclimatic approach to architecture, in BRAB conference report No. National Research Council, Washington, DC. p. 13. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?tit le=Bioclimatic%20approach%20to%20architec ture&author=V.%20Olgyay&pages=13- 23&publication_year= Poirazis, H. (2004). Double Skin Façades for Office Buildings – Literature Review, Division of Energy and Building Design, Department of Construction and Architecture, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University, Report EBD-R— 04/3, 2004. http://www.ebd.lth.se/fileadmin/energi_bygg nadsdesign/images/Publikationer/Bok-EBD-R3- G5_alt_2_Harris.pdf Singh MK, Mahapatra S, Atreya S. (2010). Thermal performance study and evaluation of comfort temperatures in vernacular buildings of North- east India. Build Environment; 45(2): 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06. Yeang, K., (1996). The Skyscraper Bioclimatically Considered, London Academy. https://doi.org/10.1017/s Z. Yılmaz and F. Çetintaş , (2005). Double skin façade’s effects on heat losses of office buildings in Istanbul, Energy Buildings, 37 (7), 691 – 697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.07.