

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The ethical dimensions of genetic enhancement, specifically focusing on the controversial topic of designer babies. It delves into the tension between individual autonomy and societal fairness, informed consent, respect for nature, and beneficence/non-maleficence. The document also highlights the influence of cultural and societal values on these ethical debates.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Ethical Dimensions of Genetic Enhancement: Navigating the Controversy of Designer Babies The subject of "designer babies" is a topic of global ethical significance that provokes profound moral and societal considerations. It pertains to the ethical predicament concerning the deliberate manipulation of a baby's genetic makeup before birth to enhance specific traits, such as intelligence or physical appearance (Smith, 2020). At its core, this issue embodies a tension between two fundamental ethical principles. One principle is the notion of individual autonomy, asserting that individuals, or in the context of designer babies, parents, should possess the freedom to make choices regarding their own lives and bodies, which includes the capacity to modify their offspring's genetic material (Jones, 2019). The other principle underscores the imperative of ensuring fairness and equity in society (Brown, 2018). Critics are concerned that permitting genetic enhancements may aggravate societal inequalities, potentially creating a gap between those who can afford such technologies and those who cannot. Moreover, the ethical dilemma encompasses the matter of informed and voluntary consent. Given that children cannot provide informed consent for genetic modifications undertaken on their behalf, deliberations ensue regarding whether parents should wield the authority to make irrevocable genetic decisions for their offspring (Johnson, 2021). A further ethical dimension revolves around the reverence for the natural order and apprehensions about tampering with the human genome (Davis, 2017). Advocates of this perspective contend that excessive genetic modification may disrupt the equilibrium of the natural world. Additionally, ethical principles of beneficence (the obligation to do good) and non-maleficence (the responsibility to avoid harm) feature prominently in the discourse (Clark, 2019). There is a discernible debate concerning whether genetic enhancements genuinely serve the well-being of individuals and society or embrace unforeseen risks and adverse consequences that necessitate rigorous scrutiny. Lastly, the moral values embedded in distinct societies and cultures exert a profound influence on the ethical dialogues surrounding designer babies (Roberts, 2020). Different cultural and regional perspectives may yield divergent assessments regarding the ethical acceptability of genetic enhancements. In summary, the moral and ethical underpinnings play an indispensable role in shaping the discourse and decision-making concerning designer babies. These foundational beliefs and
values steer the deliberations involving the interplay of autonomy, equality, consent, respect for nature, and beneficence/non-maleficence. Striking an equilibrium among these moral tenets is essential for crafting ethical guidelines and regulatory frameworks conducive to the responsible deployment of genetic technologies (Smith, 2020). References: Brown, A. (2018). Ethics in genetics and genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 19(7), 403-410. Clark, E. (2019). Genetic Enhancement and the Doctrine of Human Nature. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(3), 154-158. Davis, L. (2017). Designer babies and the pro-choice movement: A review of Samantha S. A. Giedd, 'Reproductive freedom, self-regulation, and the government of impairment in utero'. Harvard Law Review, 131(2), 685-694. Johnson, M. (2021). Ethical and legal issues in genetic testing and counselling. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 25(1), 1-2. Jones, P. (2019). The Ethics of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge University Press. Roberts, K. (2020). Cultural, ethical, and legal considerations in precision medicine. Frontiers in Genetics, 11, 634.