Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

essential conditions on torrt, Essays (university) of Law of Torts

usefull contents had done lot of work to complete this essay

Typology: Essays (university)

2023/2024

Uploaded on 12/27/2024

jobin-saji
jobin-saji 🇮🇳

3 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Introduction
tort, in common law, civil law, and the vast majority of legal systems that derive from them, any instance of harmful
behaviour, such as physical attack on one’s person or interference with one’s possessions or with the use and enjoyment
of one’s land, economic interests (under certain conditions), honour, reputation, and privacy. The term derives from
Latin tortum, meaning “something twisted, wrung, or crooked.” The concept encompasses only those civil wrongs
independent of contracts.
Other legal systems use different terminology for this wide and amorphous area of the law. Germans, for example, talk
of unlawful acts, and French-inspired systems use interchangeably the terms délits (and quasi-délits) and extra-
contractual civil responsibility. Despite differences of terminology, however, this area of the law is primarily concerned
with liability for behaviour that the legal order regards as socially unacceptable, typically warranting the award of
damages to the injured party or, occasionally, an injunction.
Essential conditions of tort
Wrong full act or omission
In tort law, a "wrongful act or omission" is an action or failure to act that violates a legal duty and causes harm or injury
to another party. A wrongful act is an intentional or negligent action that causes direct harm, such as an attack or
causing a car accident. A unlawful omission happens when a person fails to take necessary efforts to avoid harm, such as
a lifeguard neglecting to rescue a drowning swimmer while they are obligated to do so. Both improper acts and
omissions can lead to culpability because they violate the legal obligation to act reasonably and responsibly towards
others, resulting in bodily, emotional, or financial harm to the victim.
Ex.Running a red light and causing an accident that injures another driver could be considered an unlawful act. On the
other hand, a lifeguard who is on duty yet fails to save a swimmer who is drowning could be guilty of wrongful omission.
In both situations, the accountable party violates a legal obligation, which causes harm to another individual. Liability
and damages for the harmed party may result from certain acts or inactions.
DUTY IMPOSED BY LAW
In tort law, "duty imposed by law" refers to the legal duty that people or organisations have to behave in a specific way
in order to prevent harming other people. Depending on the relationship between the parties, this obligation may be
imposed by common law, statutes, or regulations. For instance, medical personnel must treat patients in accordance
with standards of care, and drivers have an obligation to drive their cars safely. A tort action for negligence may arise
when this obligation is broken and causes harm or damage. By holding people responsible for their acts or inactions that
could reasonably be expected to cause harm to others, the law seeks to safeguard both individuals and society as a
whole and encourage responsible behaviour.
Ex.A driver's duty to obey traffic laws is an example of a "duty imposed by law" in tort law. A driver has violated
their legal obligation to drive safely if they run a red light and collide with another car, injuring people. Since the driver's
disregard for traffic laws directly caused harm to others, the affected party may sue the driver for negligence and
recover damages.
LEGAL DAMAGE/INJURY
In tort law, "legal damage" or "injury" refers to the hurt or loss that an individual suffers as a result of another party's
improper behaviour. This harm may be physical, emotional, or pecuniary. Legal damage must be quantified and caused
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download essential conditions on torrt and more Essays (university) Law of Torts in PDF only on Docsity!

Introduction

tort, in common law, civil law, and the vast majority of legal systems that derive from them, any instance of harmful behaviour, such as physical attack on one’s person or interference with one’s possessions or with the use and enjoyment of one’s land, economic interests (under certain conditions), honour, reputation, and privacy. The term derives from Latin tortum, meaning “something twisted, wrung, or crooked.” The concept encompasses only those civil wrongs independent of contracts. Other legal systems use different terminology for this wide and amorphous area of the law. Germans, for example, talk of unlawful acts, and French-inspired systems use interchangeably the terms délits (and quasi-délits) and extra- contractual civil responsibility. Despite differences of terminology, however, this area of the law is primarily concerned with liability for behaviour that the legal order regards as socially unacceptable, typically warranting the award of damages to the injured party or, occasionally, an injunction.

Essential conditions of tort

Wrong full act or omission In tort law, a "wrongful act or omission" is an action or failure to act that violates a legal duty and causes harm or injury to another party. A wrongful act is an intentional or negligent action that causes direct harm, such as an attack or causing a car accident. A unlawful omission happens when a person fails to take necessary efforts to avoid harm, such as a lifeguard neglecting to rescue a drowning swimmer while they are obligated to do so. Both improper acts and omissions can lead to culpability because they violate the legal obligation to act reasonably and responsibly towards others, resulting in bodily, emotional, or financial harm to the victim. Ex.Running a red light and causing an accident that injures another driver could be considered an unlawful act. On the other hand, a lifeguard who is on duty yet fails to save a swimmer who is drowning could be guilty of wrongful omission. In both situations, the accountable party violates a legal obligation, which causes harm to another individual. Liability and damages for the harmed party may result from certain acts or inactions. DUTY IMPOSED BY LAW In tort law, "duty imposed by law" refers to the legal duty that people or organisations have to behave in a specific way in order to prevent harming other people. Depending on the relationship between the parties, this obligation may be imposed by common law, statutes, or regulations. For instance, medical personnel must treat patients in accordance with standards of care, and drivers have an obligation to drive their cars safely. A tort action for negligence may arise when this obligation is broken and causes harm or damage. By holding people responsible for their acts or inactions that could reasonably be expected to cause harm to others, the law seeks to safeguard both individuals and society as a whole and encourage responsible behaviour.

Ex.A driver's duty to obey traffic laws is an example of a "duty imposed by law" in tort law. A driver has violated

their legal obligation to drive safely if they run a red light and collide with another car, injuring people. Since the driver's disregard for traffic laws directly caused harm to others, the affected party may sue the driver for negligence and recover damages. LEGAL DAMAGE/INJURY In tort law, "legal damage" or "injury" refers to the hurt or loss that an individual suffers as a result of another party's improper behaviour. This harm may be physical, emotional, or pecuniary. Legal damage must be quantified and caused

by a breach of duty, such as negligence, intentional wrongdoing, or strict liability. For example, if someone is wounded in a car accident caused by another driver's negligence, they may face medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. To win a tort claim, the injured party must show that the defendant's acts actually caused the harm and that they incurred a legally recognised injury that can be paid by damages given by the court. Ex.In a slip-and-fall case, Jane trips on a broken stair in a store. She injures her ankle, incurs medical expenditures, and loses money since she is unable to work. Jane sues the store for carelessness and seeks reimbursement for the legal losses caused by the unsafe condition. "Injuria sine damno" permits claims for rights infringement in cases where there is a legal injury but no real damage. In contrast, "damnum sine injuria" describes harm without legal injury, in which there is no claim in spite of losses. By separating actionable claims from non-actionable damages in tort law, they collectively make tort liability more understandable. INJURIA SINE DAMNUM The legal adage "Injuria sine damnum" refers to "injury without damage." It refers to a circumstance in which a legal right is violated yet the aggrieved party suffers no physical or financial loss. In such circumstances, the law recognises a violation of rights, allowing the injured party to seek legal redress even in the absence of quantifiable damages. This principle emphasises the significance of protecting individual rights, stating that legal action can be taken for violations regardless of whether physical harm has occurred. It emphasises the difference between legal injury and actual damages in tort law. An important decision in English tort law, Ashby v. White (1703), created the idea of "injuria sine damno." In this instance, Ashby was eligible to vote but was refused the opportunity by returning officer White. Despite Ashby experiencing no real harm or loss, the court decided that he could file a lawsuit for the violation of his right to vote. This case upheld the idea that a legal right breach in and of itself is an injury that calls for a remedy. DAMNUM SINE INJURIA The legal maxim "Damnum sine injuria" means "damage without injury." It refers to instances in which a person suffers a loss or harm but has no legal recourse for compensation since no legal right has been infringed. For example, if a business suffers financial losses as a result of competition but no illegal acts were taken against it, it cannot seek damages. This theory emphasises that not every harm or damage results in a legal remedy; the existence of a legal injury is required to pursue a tort claim. The Gloucester School Case, also known as Gloucester Grammar School v. Gloucester City Council (1993), was a legal dispute concerning the closing of a grammar school and the resultant loss of educational possibilities for pupils. The court determined that, while the closure harmed the pupils' education, it did not represent a legal injury because no legal rights were infringed. This case exhibits the notion of "damnum sine injuria," which states that harm or loss does not always result in a compensable legal claim if no rights are violated.

Remedy

In tort law, remedies are legal ways to remedy and make up for damage or injury that another party has suffered as a result of one party's wrongdoing. Monetary damages are the main remedy, and they are intended to put the injured person back in the same situation as before the injury. One might categorise damages as punitive (designed to punish the culprit and deter future wrongdoing) or compensatory (intended to cover genuine losses like medical expenses and lost wages). In certain situations, equitable remedies like specific performance to carry out a duty or injunctions to stop more harm may be sought. The tort's nature, the severity of the harm, and the injured party's objectives—whether they be justice, deterrent, or compensation—all influence the remedy selection. Ex.When Driver A is at fault in an automobile accident, Driver B may be entitled to compensation for pain and suffering, lost wages, property damage, and medical costs. Punitive damages might be applicable if Driver A's acts were extremely heinous. If injury persists, equitable remedies may also be pursued.

Tort influences