

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Erving goffman's work 'asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates', published in 1961. The connections between goffman's account of life in a 'mental hospital' and the film 'one flew over the cuckoo's nest'. It reflects on the degree to which total institutions in healthcare have changed and questions whether the social processes of control and bureaucratic administration have been eliminated. The document also delves into the concept of 'mortification of self' and the five types of institutions, including nursing homes and hospitals.
What you will learn
Typology: Exams
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
“NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Nurse Education Today Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Nurse Education Today 33 (2) 2012 Big Ideas Erving Goffman and the 'Total Institution' The four essays in Erving Goffman's work Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates were published in 1961, and anyone who has both read the book and seen the film One flew over the cuckoo's nest will not fail to make the connections between the two. The vivid depiction of institutional life in the film may be considered a relic of history, and Goffman's account of life in a 'mental hospital' a bygone era. Asylums may have been demolished and the care of vulnerable adults transferred to community settings. However, we may wish to reflect upon the degree to which the social processes of total institutions also lie in ruins, to be replaced by respect, dignity, autonomy and beneficence. Of course, the answer has to be that total institutions in health care are no more: we consider that we have banished paternalism and 'institutionalising' practices to the dustbin of history. However, given the reports of poor quality care in too many care organisations (and not just in the UK), we might want to revisit Goffman and ask ourselves: ‘To what degree have modern healthcare organisations moved on in the mode of delivery and bureaucratic control of patients and clients in their care, or is there something inherently totalising in the very fabric of their being?’ We might want to consider the obvious point that although the total institution was manifest (often literally) in concrete form, its social processes are not. They arise from human interaction, which itself both constructs and is constructed by individuals based on their values, culture and taken-for- granted social practices. As Foucault, among others, reminded us, these also operate within a matrix of power relationships. Thus, demolishing the concrete does not necessarily demolish the social ; the totalising processes may simply transfer to new concrete settings. Total Institutions are characterised by the bureaucratic control of the human needs of a group of people, and it operates through the mechanism of the ‘mortification of self’. Goffman outlined 5 types of institution (prisons, asylums, military barracks and certain religious orders), and for our purposes these include nursing homes and hospitals where vulnerable people who may or may not be a threat to themselves and society are controlled for the purposes of treating or managing an illness or condition, be it chronic or acute. Goffman defines total institutions as social arrangements that are regulated according to one rational plan and that occur under one roof. The 'total institution', then, is a ‘living space’ in which people who share a similar social situation (for example those in need of health and social care) are cut off from the wider society for a considerable time. They lead an enclosed, 'formally administered round of life' (p11) encompassing many of their activities of daily living such as sleeping, eating, working and playing. In civil society we work, play and sleep in different places with different persons under different authorities. In total institutions these three activity spheres of life lose their separate boundaries in various ways. First, life is experienced and controlled in the same place by the same central authority. Second, activities of daily living are conducted often in the presence of a large group of people in similar circumstances. These others may be treated very similarly and may be required to do the same things jointly. Third, all phases of daily activities are carefully planned, with one activity leading
into the next at a prearranged time and often to meet organisational rather than individual needs. The social processes of the ‘mortification of self’ evolve and develop over time, and thus very short episodes of care that quickly lead to discharge may avoid totalising and bureaucratic control. Totalising is also related to the degree to which the patient or client is excluded from knowledge of the decisions taken about them concerning their treatments. A person's self is mortified by the following processes: