Download english notes for englisgh and more Cheat Sheet English Literature in PDF only on Docsity!
Explanation: Option A is incorrect because the passage doesn't conclusively prove a smaller sun radius. Option B is incorrect as it oversimplifies the methods used to estimate the sun's size historically. Option D is incorrect because it exaggerates the reduction's significance. Option C is the correct answer because it aligns with the passage's emphasis on the potential distortion of seismological data due to a smaller sun radius, impacting our understanding of the sun's internal structure. Explanation: Question 2 asks about William Chaplin's primary concern in relation to the recent findings about the sun's size. The passage clearly states that Chaplin's primary concern is the potential misjudgments arising from inaccurate radius measurements, particularly their impact on interpretations of nuclear reactions, chemical composition, and the sun's fundamental structure. This makes Option C the correct choice as it directly reflects Chaplin's primary concern. Option A is not correct because the passage doesn't suggest a need for more solar eclipses; instead, it discusses the limitations of historical methods. Option B is not the primary concern mentioned, and Option D is not directly related to the concerns raised by Chaplin in the passage. Explanation: The passage primarily discusses recent discoveries about the sun's size and how they challenge existing astronomical knowledge due to potential implications for seismological data. Therefore, Option B accurately encapsulates the passage's central theme. Option A is not the main point; it talks about historical methods but doesn't emphasize their inaccuracy. Option C overstates the conclusion, as the passage discusses a recalibration but doesn't definitively determine the sun's radius. Option D introduces an unrelated topic about sound waves, which is not the central theme of the passage. Explanation: Question 4 asks which statement, if true, would weaken the implications of the recent findings about the sun's size discussed in the passage. The passage suggests that the reduction in the sun's radius could have significant implications for our understanding of nuclear reactions and the sun's chemical composition. Option B weakens these implications by stating that the reduction in the sun's radius has no effect on our understanding of nuclear reactions and the sun's chemical composition. Option A is not correct because it strengthens the passage's implications by suggesting the accuracy of historical measurement methods. Option C doesn't weaken the implications; it merely suggests that the issue with the sun's radius measurement has been ongoing. Option D introduces a new method but does not directly address the implications raised in the passage.
Question 1 Explanation: The correct answer is (A). The passage clearly states that the high-pitched squeaks produced by rats in the study were found to be random and unrelated to the rats' emotions. This finding challenges the conventional understanding that these vocalizations serve as specific emotional signals. Option (B) is incorrect because the passage does not support the idea that these squeaks were specific responses to the actions and behaviors of the other rat. Option (C) is not accurate as the passage does not suggest that the high-pitched squeaks were indicative of distress. Option (D) is also incorrect because the passage states that these high-pitched squeaks were produced when the rats were in physical contact with another rat, indicating a social context for the vocalizations rather than solitary situations. Question 2 Explanation: The correct answer is (C). The primary point of intrigue and uncertainty regarding the 6 kHz squeak is that its meaning and purpose remain unclear. The passage does not provide information to definitively attribute the 6 kHz squeak to distress or communication with other animals or humans, making option (A) and (B) incorrect. Option (D) is also incorrect because the passage does not suggest that the 6 kHz squeak is reserved for communication between rats and humans; it remains an unexplained vocalization in the presence of other rats. Question 3 Explanation: The correct answer is (C). The passage implies that the potential applications of miniature microphones used in the study extend to advancing our understanding of complex social behaviors among rats, potentially unlocking deeper insights into their social dynamics. Option (A) is incorrect because the passage does not focus on monitoring the physical movements of rats as a suggested application. Option (B) is not supported by the passage, which does not mention studying the feeding habits of rats as an implied application. Option (D) is also incorrect because the passage does not suggest that miniature microphones would be used for recording the brain activity of rats. Question 4 Explanation: The correct answer is (A). The passage highlights that the key challenge is to determine the precise purpose of these vocalizations and their underlying emotional significance, as these vocalizations appeared random and unrelated to specific actions or behaviors of other rats. The implications of this finding are significant for our understanding of rat behavior and communication. Option (B) is incorrect because the passage already indicates that the vocalizations were associated with happiness. Option (C) is not accurate as it simplifies the challenge and implies that the primary concern is explaining why rats produce high-pitched vocalizations. Option (D) is also incorrect because it misinterprets the challenge, which is not about differentiating these vocalizations from distress signals but understanding their purpose and emotional significance.
Question 1: The primary purpose of the passage is to present research findings indicating that the sun is slightly smaller than previously thought and to discuss the implications of this discovery. Therefore, the correct answer is (D). While the passage does mention the historical method of estimating the sun's size, it is not the central focus of the passage. The passage also briefly mentions the differences between f- waves and p-waves, but this is not the main purpose of the passage. Question 2: The passage describes that astronomers historically estimated the size of the sun's photosphere by measuring it during solar eclipses. It further explains that this method, while widely used, was associated with the potential for incomplete knowledge of the sun's interior. The correct answer is (B) because it accurately summarizes the historical method and its associated issues. Options (A) and (C) do not accurately describe the historical method, and option (D) is incorrect because it suggests that the method yielded results slightly smaller than direct measurements, which is not the case according to the passage. Question 3: The passage does not provide a clear opinion on the significance of the method involving p- waves. However, it mentions that the use of p-waves gives a slightly smaller result than measuring the photosphere. The correct answer is (B) because it reflects the information in the passage that acknowledges the method's accuracy compared to the photosphere measurement but suggests that its impact on our understanding of the sun's interior may be limited. Options (A), (C), and (D) do not accurately represent the passage's viewpoint on the p-wave method. Question 4: The subtle elements mentioned in the passage refer to various aspects of the sun's internal structure, such as nuclear reactions, chemical composition, and basic structure. An inaccurate measurement of the sun's radius can impact our understanding of these elements. The correct answer is (B) because it best summarizes this relationship. Options (A), (C), and (D) introduce elements not discussed in the passage or inaccurately describe the impact of the radius measurement. Question 5: The significance of the statement is that a different sun radius would result in different depths for the layers of the sun's plasma. This, in turn, has implications for seismological inferences about the sun's internal structure, including aspects like nuclear reactions and chemical composition. The correct answer is (B) because it accurately conveys this relationship. Options (A), (C), and (D) introduce elements not discussed in the passage or inaccurately describe the relationship between the sun's radius and its plasma layers. The correct answer is (c) – It is acceptable for India to trade with a country that engages in wars if other nations also trade with that country. Jaishankar argues that India’s purchases from Russian oil are no different from Western countries’ purchase of Russian oil and gas, and asks if only India’s oil purchases fund Russia’s war against Ukraine, but not Western countries’ purchases of Russian oil and gas. He does
this while refuting the statement that India’s purchase of Russian oil is funding Russia’s war against Ukraine, and to justify such purchases by India. Option (c) states a similar argument, and claims that India can trade with a country that engage in wars if other nations also do so. Option (a) cannot be the correct answer since it would undermine Jaishankar’s justification of India’s purchases of Russian oil. Similarly, option (b) cannot be the correct answer since it would imply that India should not trade with any country, while Jaishankar seeks to justify India’s trade with Russia (through its purchase of Russian oil). Option (d) is directly contradictory to 9 Jaishankar’s arguments in the passage above, and so, it cannot be the correct answer. Rationale The correct answer is (b) – One should not place too much emphasis on the fact that India’s import of Russian crude has multiplied nine times, since India imported a very small volume of oil from Russia in the past. Jaishankar says that the discussion about India’s import of Russian crude increasing nine times should also account for the fact that that was “from a very low base at a time when markets were more open”. Option (b) most closely reflects this statement, and so, it is the correct answer. Option (a) argues that one should disregard the low base from which India’s import of Russian crude have multiplied, which is contrary to Jaishankar’s argument that the past low base should be taken into consideration, and so, it cannot be the correct answer. Option (c) contradicts Jaishankar’s claim of the multiple being over “a very low base”, and so, it cannot be the correct answer. There is nothing in the passage to support the claim in option (d), and so, it cannot be the correct answer. The correct answer is (a) – All Western nations, including those in Europe and the US, have banned imports of Russian oil and gas completely. Jaishankar argues that it is wrong for the Western nations to suggest that India’s purchases of Russian crude oil are funding the war in Ukraine, since they continue to import Russian oil 10 and gas, and have included carveouts in sanctions imposed on Russia that allow them to access Russian gas. If the statement in option (a) were true, the premise on which Jaishankar’s argument is based would be negated, thereby weakening his argument. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. Option (b) supports Jaishankar’s argument directly, and so, it cannot be the correct answer. Option (c) is similar to Jaishankar’s argument about how all other sources for India have been ‘squeezed’ and so, it cannot be the correct answer. Jaishankar’s arguments justifying India’s imports of Russian oil are based on the fact that Western nations continue to import Russian oil and gas; further, there is nothing in the passage that would provide any information about whether India’s efforts to develop sources of renewable energy sources is comparable to the West, and so, option (d) cannot be the correct answer. The correct answer is (b) – That international traders in centres such as Singapore and Dubai prevent Indian wheat exports from reaching developing countries that need them. Jaishankar says that speculation by traders in Singapore and Dubai is the reason why India banned wheat exports, while saying that India remains committed to providing wheat to developing countries that have a genuine need for food grains. This implies that the speculation by such traders prevents Indian wheat exports from reaching developing countries that genuinely need food grains, and so, option (b) is the correct answer. He does not suggest that high-income countries do not need Indian wheat exports, merely that India is committed to providing such food grains to developing countries in need; therefore, there is nothing in the passage to support option (a), and so, it cannot be the correct answer. The statement in
