Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Different Models - Development - Past Exam, Exams of Economics

Different Models, Demographic Characteristics, Data Collected, Initial Investigation, Different Households, Group of Households, Empirical Strategy, Analyze and Contrast, Pro tability are some important points of this exam paper.

Typology: Exams

2011/2012

Uploaded on 12/04/2012

devpad
devpad 🇮🇳

4.1

(54)

81 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Development Field Exam
January 11, 2012
Please answer all four questions. Each question will be graded equally. You have three
hours to complete the exam.
Question 1
Consider a collection of villages indexed by v= 1, . . . , V . The vth village has Nvpeople,
each belonging to one of MvNvhouseholds; the number of people in the ith household in
village vis given by nv
i. You have data on basic demographic characteristics of all of these
people, and a panel of data collected over T > 1 years on income (yv
it) and expenditures (cv
it)
collected at the level of the household. The data collection is on-going.
Your initial investigation of the data reveals an interesting pattern: If you make a his-
togram of consumption growth rates for different households (e.g., of (cv
iT cv
i1)/cv
i1) there’s
a pronounced bimodality, with one group of households evidently having significantly higher
rates of growth than the other.
1. Briefly describe three different models that might explain these differences in consump-
tion growth.
2. For each of these three hypotheses, describe an empirical strategy which would allow
you to test the model.
Question 2
Analyze and contrast the positions of Foster and Rosenzweig; Duflo, Kremer, and Robinson;
and Suri, on the importance of profitability for the adoption of fertilizer and improved seeds
in Africa. For each of these papers
1. State the main position of the authors.
2. Explain with precision how they support their position, reporting in detail on empirical
evidence if it applies. Discuss these empirical findings, pointing to their limitations or
weaknesses.
3. Explain how the authors argue against the theoretical or empirical studies that con-
tradict their position in the debate.
1
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Different Models - Development - Past Exam and more Exams Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

Development Field Exam

January 11, 2012

Please answer all four questions. Each question will be graded equally. You have three hours to complete the exam.

Question 1

Consider a collection of villages indexed by v = 1,... , V. The vth village has Nv people, each belonging to one of Mv ≤ Nv households; the number of people in the ith household in village v is given by nvi. You have data on basic demographic characteristics of all of these people, and a panel of data collected over T > 1 years on income (yvit) and expenditures (cvit) collected at the level of the household. The data collection is on-going. Your initial investigation of the data reveals an interesting pattern: If you make a his- togram of consumption growth rates for different households (e.g., of (cviT − cvi 1 )/cvi 1 ) there’s a pronounced bimodality, with one group of households evidently having significantly higher rates of growth than the other.

  1. Briefly describe three different models that might explain these differences in consump- tion growth.
  2. For each of these three hypotheses, describe an empirical strategy which would allow you to test the model.

Question 2

Analyze and contrast the positions of Foster and Rosenzweig; Duflo, Kremer, and Robinson; and Suri, on the importance of profitability for the adoption of fertilizer and improved seeds in Africa. For each of these papers

  1. State the main position of the authors.
  2. Explain with precision how they support their position, reporting in detail on empirical evidence if it applies. Discuss these empirical findings, pointing to their limitations or weaknesses.
  3. Explain how the authors argue against the theoretical or empirical studies that con- tradict their position in the debate.

Question 3

  1. Briefly describe the theory for why corruption need not lead to short-run inefficiencies? Why might these theoretical arguments not hold in general equilibrium?
  2. Why has it been so difficult to show empirically the effects of corruption on economic development? Briefly discuss two papers that have tried to address this question empirically. What are the strengths and weaknesses of these papers?
  3. What would Fisman and Miguel (2007) and Olken and Barron (2009) argue are im- portant determinants of corruption? For each paper describe the data, econometric approach, and robustness of the findings.

Question 4

  1. Describe the cross-country relationship between civil conflict incidence and per capita income levels. Which world regions have particularly high rates of civil conflict?
  2. Causality remains a key issue in interpreting these cross-country patterns. Briefly discuss the intuition behind at least one theoretical explanation for why poverty (low income levels) could increase civil conflict risk, and one explanation for how civil conflict could increase poverty.
  3. Describe the main predictions of the Chassang and Padro-i-Miquel (2010) model of economic shocks and civil conflict. Why do permanent and transitory income shocks have different implications for conflict risk in their framework?
  4. Describe the cross-country relationship between changes in per capita income and civil conflict incidence documented in Miguel, Satyanath and Sergenti (2004). Briefly discuss their data and econometric methodology, and relate their findings to predictions of the Chassang and Padro-i-Miquel (2010) model.