Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Philanthropic Giving to Universities: CASE-Ross Survey Definitions and Exclusions, Lecture notes of Communication

The definitions and exclusions of philanthropic giving to universities as set by the case-ross support of education survey. It covers the intent and source of the income, as well as exclusions such as contractual relationships, exclusive information, and intellectual property rights. The document also lists the eligible sources of philanthropic income for the university.

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

andreasphd
andreasphd 🇬🇧

4.7

(28)

288 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Definition of a philanthropic gift
In considering whether income to the University can be counted as philanthropic income, the
University follows the standard definitions set by the CASE-Ross Support of Education Survey,
which compiles annual information on philanthropic giving to higher education institutions in the
UK. https://www.case.org/resources/case-ross-support-education-survey-united-kingdom-
and-ireland
These definitions centre on the SOURCE of the income and the INTENT behind it.
INTENT
The University believes that for income to be considered to be a philanthropic gift it must meet the
CASE-Ross Survey’s definition of philanthropic intent:
‘all giving which does not confer full or partial ownership of a deliverable, financial benefit,
or control to the funder in return for funding. The gift must be owned in full by the receiving
institution once it is recei ved.1
The CASE-Ross Survey states that if any of the following 7 exclusions apply, the income does not
constitute a philanthropic gift and must not be counted as such.
Exclusions from philanthropic intent
If any one of the 7 exclusion criteria below apply,
the whole of the funding associated with an
agreement becomes ineligible for description as
philanthropic
Description
Exclusion Criteria
1
Contractual relationship
A contract exists between the two parties which
commits the recipient institution [the University]
to provide an economic benefit for
compensation, where the agreement is binding
and creates a quid pro quo relationship between
the recipient institution [the University] and the
donor. Contract income, including income for
clinical trials, is ineligible.
2
Exclusive information
The funder is entitled to receive exclusive
information, or other privileged access to data or
results emerging from the programme of activity.
3
Exclusive publication
The funder is entitled to exclusive rights to
publication of research or other results through
their own branded communication channels
(website, report etc).
4
Consultancy included
Consultancy for the donor or a linked
organisation is included as part of the agreement.
1 CASE-Ross Group Support of Education Survey, UK and Ireland 2018-19, Supporting Document, paragraph
A.2.2 Definition of philanthropic intent
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Philanthropic Giving to Universities: CASE-Ross Survey Definitions and Exclusions and more Lecture notes Communication in PDF only on Docsity!

Definition of a philanthropic gift

In considering whether income to the University can be counted as philanthropic income, the University follows the standard definitions set by the CASE-Ross Support of Education Survey, which compiles annual information on philanthropic giving to higher education institutions in the

UK. https://www.case.org/resources/case-ross-support-education-survey-united-kingdom-

and-ireland

These definitions centre on the SOURCE of the income and the INTENT behind it.

INTENT The University believes that for income to be considered to be a philanthropic gift it must meet the CASE-Ross Survey’s definition of philanthropic intent:

‘all giving which does not confer full or partial ownership of a deliverable, financial benefit, or control to the funder in return for funding. The gift must be owned in full by the receiving institution once it is received.’^1

The CASE-Ross Survey states that if any of the following 7 exclusions apply, the income does not constitute a philanthropic gift and must not be counted as such.

Exclusions from philanthropic intent If any one of the 7 exclusion criteria below apply, the whole of the funding associated with an agreement becomes ineligible for description as philanthropic

Description

Exclusion Criteria

1 Contractual relationship^ A contract exists between the two parties which commits the recipient institution [the University] to provide an economic benefit for compensation, where the agreement is binding and creates a quid pro quo relationship between the recipient institution [the University] and the donor. Contract income, including income for clinical trials, is ineligible.

2 Exclusive information^ The^ funder^ is entitled to receive exclusive information, or other privileged access to data or results emerging from the programme of activity. 3 Exclusive publication^ The funder is entitled to exclusive rights to publication of research or other results through their own branded communication channels (website, report etc). 4 Consultancy included Consultancy for the donor or a linked organisation is included as part of the agreement.

(^1) CASE-Ross Group Support of Education Survey, UK and Ireland 2018-19, Supporting Document, paragraph

A.2.2 Definition of philanthropic intent

5 IP rights^ The agreement assigns to the donor any full or partial rights to intellectual property which may result from the programme of activity. This exclusion extends to the provision of royalty-free licenses (whether exclusive or non-exclusive), to the funder, and also to granting the funder first option or similar exclusive rights to purchase the rights to any subsequent commercial opportunities. If the written agreement includes any actual or potential future benefit of this kind, it must be excluded.

6 Other forms of financial benefit Any other direct financial benefits are required by the funder as a condition of the funding (e.g. discounted courses, training etc). 7 Funder control The funder retains control over operational decisions relating to the use of funds once the gift has been made. This includes control over appointment and selection procedures to academic posts and student scholarships. (Source: CASE-Ross Survey guidelines^2 )

This list is not comprehensive. There may also be other circumstances where service provision with a commercial value means that funding cannot be regarded as having philanthropic intent.

SOURCE

If income qualifies as philanthropic under the definition above, and no exclusion criteria apply, the University then follows CASE-Ross Survey guidelines to determine whether the income comes from a source which is eligible to be deemed philanthropic. These are deemed to be the following:

  • Gifts from personal donors, in the UK and overseas, of cash and other instruments of wealth, including shares, appreciated securities, bonds etc.;
  • Gifts-in-kind of physical items – property, art, equipment etc.;
  • Legacy income received from deceased individuals;
  • Donations from charitable trusts and foundations in the UK and overseas. This includes donations from independent charities associated with NHS Trusts (but not direct from NHS Trusts);
  • Grants made by affiliated and support foundations such as North American 501(c)(3) organisations and similar organisations in other countries;
  • Gifts from companies in the UK and overseas;
  • Gifts from overseas governments or their agencies and foundations;
  • Income from the National Lottery and similar sources (e.g. Heritage Lottery Fund, Sport England etc.);
  • Funding through the Land Fill Scheme

The above shall be the only sources of funds deemed to be philanthropic, countable as such by the University, and subject to scrutiny by the University’s Gift Oversight Group.

(^2) CASE-Ross Group Support of Education Survey, UK and Ireland 2018-19, Supporting Document, paragraph

A.2.2 Definition of philanthropic intent

Document Control Box

Policy/Procedure Title Definition of a Gift

Date approved (current version) 12/06/

Approving body Gift Oversight Group

Version 3.

Supersedes 2.

Previous review dates 21 /09/ 2009 (1.0) 02/03/2016 (2.0) Equality Impact Outcome: Equality issues considered

Next Review Date 12/06/

Related Statutes, Ordinances, General Regulations:

XI – Corporate, financial and estate management

Ordinance VII – Arrangements for Effective Governance and Internal Management and Financial Control Related policies: Financial Regulations

Money Laundering Policy

Gift Acceptance Policy Related procedures: Financial Procedures

Related guidance or codes of practice:

Related information: N/A

Policy owner: Director of Development (Kate White)

Lead contact: Development Research Manager and Secretary of the Gift Oversight Group (Oliver Taylor)