


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The definitions and exclusions of philanthropic giving to universities as set by the case-ross support of education survey. It covers the intent and source of the income, as well as exclusions such as contractual relationships, exclusive information, and intellectual property rights. The document also lists the eligible sources of philanthropic income for the university.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Definition of a philanthropic gift
In considering whether income to the University can be counted as philanthropic income, the University follows the standard definitions set by the CASE-Ross Support of Education Survey, which compiles annual information on philanthropic giving to higher education institutions in the
These definitions centre on the SOURCE of the income and the INTENT behind it.
INTENT The University believes that for income to be considered to be a philanthropic gift it must meet the CASE-Ross Survey’s definition of philanthropic intent:
‘all giving which does not confer full or partial ownership of a deliverable, financial benefit, or control to the funder in return for funding. The gift must be owned in full by the receiving institution once it is received.’^1
The CASE-Ross Survey states that if any of the following 7 exclusions apply, the income does not constitute a philanthropic gift and must not be counted as such.
Exclusions from philanthropic intent If any one of the 7 exclusion criteria below apply, the whole of the funding associated with an agreement becomes ineligible for description as philanthropic
Description
Exclusion Criteria
1 Contractual relationship^ A contract exists between the two parties which commits the recipient institution [the University] to provide an economic benefit for compensation, where the agreement is binding and creates a quid pro quo relationship between the recipient institution [the University] and the donor. Contract income, including income for clinical trials, is ineligible.
2 Exclusive information^ The^ funder^ is entitled to receive exclusive information, or other privileged access to data or results emerging from the programme of activity. 3 Exclusive publication^ The funder is entitled to exclusive rights to publication of research or other results through their own branded communication channels (website, report etc). 4 Consultancy included Consultancy for the donor or a linked organisation is included as part of the agreement.
(^1) CASE-Ross Group Support of Education Survey, UK and Ireland 2018-19, Supporting Document, paragraph
A.2.2 Definition of philanthropic intent
5 IP rights^ The agreement assigns to the donor any full or partial rights to intellectual property which may result from the programme of activity. This exclusion extends to the provision of royalty-free licenses (whether exclusive or non-exclusive), to the funder, and also to granting the funder first option or similar exclusive rights to purchase the rights to any subsequent commercial opportunities. If the written agreement includes any actual or potential future benefit of this kind, it must be excluded.
6 Other forms of financial benefit Any other direct financial benefits are required by the funder as a condition of the funding (e.g. discounted courses, training etc). 7 Funder control The funder retains control over operational decisions relating to the use of funds once the gift has been made. This includes control over appointment and selection procedures to academic posts and student scholarships. (Source: CASE-Ross Survey guidelines^2 )
This list is not comprehensive. There may also be other circumstances where service provision with a commercial value means that funding cannot be regarded as having philanthropic intent.
If income qualifies as philanthropic under the definition above, and no exclusion criteria apply, the University then follows CASE-Ross Survey guidelines to determine whether the income comes from a source which is eligible to be deemed philanthropic. These are deemed to be the following:
The above shall be the only sources of funds deemed to be philanthropic, countable as such by the University, and subject to scrutiny by the University’s Gift Oversight Group.
(^2) CASE-Ross Group Support of Education Survey, UK and Ireland 2018-19, Supporting Document, paragraph
A.2.2 Definition of philanthropic intent
Document Control Box
Policy/Procedure Title Definition of a Gift
Date approved (current version) 12/06/
Approving body Gift Oversight Group
Version 3.
Supersedes 2.
Previous review dates 21 /09/ 2009 (1.0) 02/03/2016 (2.0) Equality Impact Outcome: Equality issues considered
Next Review Date 12/06/
Related Statutes, Ordinances, General Regulations:
XI – Corporate, financial and estate management
Ordinance VII – Arrangements for Effective Governance and Internal Management and Financial Control Related policies: Financial Regulations
Money Laundering Policy
Gift Acceptance Policy Related procedures: Financial Procedures
Related guidance or codes of practice:
Related information: N/A
Policy owner: Director of Development (Kate White)
Lead contact: Development Research Manager and Secretary of the Gift Oversight Group (Oliver Taylor)