



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
In these Lecture Notes, the Lecturer has explained the fundamental concepts of Geochemistry. Some of which are : Decreased, Peat, Soil, High Latitudes, Terrestrial Biosphere, Carbonate Compensation, Organisms, Atmospheric, Henrich, North Atlantic
Typology: Study notes
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
10,000 to 7500 years ago, CO 2 decreased slightly while δ^13 C increased relatively rapidly. The principle effect here was most likely expansion of the terrestrial biosphere to previously glaciated areas and stor- age of isotopically light carbon in peat and soil at high latitudes. Changes in carbonate compensation and growth of coral reefs (to keep up with rising sealevel) likely also had an influence. Coral reef growth, perhaps counter-intuitively, has the effect of increasing atmospheric CO 2. Reef organisms ef- fectively precipitate calcite through the reaction:
Consequently, reef growth decreases ocean alkalinity and pH, allowing the oceans to dissolve less CO 2. Prior to 11,000 years ago, the variation in δ^13 C is more complex. Over this period, δ^13 C correlates with the slope of the atmospheric CO 2 curve rather than its value, such that δ^13 C is low when CO 2 concentra- tion is rising rapidly. An initial increase in atmospheric CO 2 and decrease in δ^13 C marks the end of the last glacial maximum around the time of Henrich Event 1 (Henrich events, first identified as layers of ice-rafted debris in sediment cores from the North Atlantic, are now understood to be events where the North American ice sheet destabilized and sent great flotillas of icebergs into the North Atlantic.) The is followed by period when δ^13 C increased and atmospheric CO 2 concentrations stabilized during the Bøl- ling-Allerød period, a time recognized from pollen records of Europe as one of rapidly moderating cli- mate and ice sheet retreat. Following this, δ^13 C again decreased and atmospheric CO 2 increased in the Younger Dryas period, a time recognized from European pollen records as a return to cold, almost gla- cial, conditions. Laurantou et al. (2010) concluded from this record that changes in Southern Ocean ventilation played the dominant role changing atmospheric CO 2 , but changes in marine productivity, North Atlantic circulation, and the terrestrial biosphere were involved as well. The initial increase in atmospheric CO 2 is likely due to more rapid ventilation of the Southern Ocean in a poleward shift in Westerlies as suggested by Tuggweiler et al. (2006), but reduced ocean productivity also played a role. During the Bølling-Allerød, production of North Atlantic Deep Water intensified, enhancing warming in the North Atlantic region. In response, expansion of the northern hemisphere terrestrial biosphere to higher latitudes and consequent build up of carbon and peat eventually caused δ^13 C to decrease and the increase in atmospheric CO 2 to stall. Meltwater from retreating glaciers flooded the North Atlantic in the Younger Dryas shut down NADW production, producing locally cooler conditions but resulting in more vigorous Southern Ocean overturn, driving up atmospheric CO 2 and increasing its δ^13 C.
On geologic times scales, the carbon cycle model must be augmented by 3 reservoirs, sedimentary carbonate, sedimentary organic carbon, and the mantle, as well as fluxes between these reservoirs and the oceans and atmosphere. Such a long-term model is shown in Figure 10.37, where the anthropogenic perturbations have been removed. The most important thing to notice is that there is much more car- bon in the carbonate and sedimentary organic carbon reservoirs than in all the reservoirs in Figure 10.29 combined. However, the fluxes to and from the sedimentary reservoirs are small, so they play lit- tle role in short-term (< 1 Ma) atmospheric CO 2 variations (at least in natural ones: we could properly consider fossil fuel burning as a flux from sedimentary organic carbon to the atmosphere). We should also point out that only a small fraction of the sedimentary organic carbon is recoverable fuel; most is present as minor amounts (typically 0.5% or less) of kerogen and other refractory organic compounds in sediments. Even greater amounts of carbon are probably stored in the mantle, though the precise amount is difficult to estimate. An order of magnitude figure might be 125-500 ppm CO 2 in mantle, which implies a total inventory of 1.3-5 × 10 8 Gt, or nearly 10 6 times the amount in the atmosphere. Again, the flux from the mantle to the atmosphere, which results from volcanism, is small, so the man- tle plays no role in short-term atmospheric CO 2 variations. On long time scales (>10 6 yr), however, it is the fluxes to and from sediments and the mantle that control the atmospheric CO 2 concentration.
Figure 10.38 shows δ^13 C and δ^18 O in benthic forams from 40 DSDP and ODP drill cores selected to represent, as best as possible, global means. On these time scales, the main influences δ^13 C are changes in biological productivity and ocean circulation, burial and erosion of carbon in sediments, and the vol- canic flux. Recall that organic carbon has strongly negative δ^13 C – burial of organic carbon will drive the marine system toward more positive values, erosion of organic carbon will drive it to negative val- ues. Volcanic CO 2 has δ^13 C of -6, very similar to the atmospheric value, so changes in the volcanic flux will have a minimal effect on the system. The fractionation between dissolved carbonate and precipi- tated carbonate is fairly small, so both erosion and burial of carbonate also have only a small effect on δ^13 C of the system. There are a number of interesting features of this record. Let’s consider these in chronological sequence. First, there is a decline in δ^13 C around the Cretaceous- Tertiary boundary. This is not well shown in Figure 10.38 because the curve has been smoothed, but does show up well in detailed studies, such as that of d’Hondt et al. (1998). Figure 10.39 shows δ^13 C values in carbonate from DSDP site 528. The data show a sharp drop in δ^13 C at the K-T boundary. This is consistent with a strong reduction in bio- productivity, and consequently, a drop in the burial rate of organic carbon. The marine system appears to have partially recovered within a million years, and completely recovered within 3 million years. The next notable event is the so-called Late Paleocene Thermal Maximum at 55 Ma. A sharp drop (~2.5‰) in δ^13 C coincides with an increase in δ^18 O that corresponds to an increase in deep ocean tem- perature of 5-6˚C that occurred within 10,000 years. Recovery occurred over 500,000 years. The event
Figure 10.37. The long-term carbon cycle. Roman (black) numbers show the amount of carbon (in 10^18 grams) in the reservoirs. Fluxes between these reservoirs (arrows) are shown in (red) italics in units of 1018 g/yr. Values are the pre-Industrial Revolution state of the system. Uncertainties on many of the masses and fluxes are large. Also shown are estimates of the carbon isotopic composition.
The next events are the Oi- 1 and Mi- 1 glaciations both of which that reflect brief extremes in Antarctic ice-volume and temper-
Figure 10.38. δ^13 C an Ariald δ^18 O in marine benthic foraminifera. Data are a compilation from many cores. In the Late Miocene, δ^13 C of Pacific and Atlantic bottom waters diverge, and these are shown as separate curves. Also shown are significant climatic, tectonic, and biologic events Modified from Zachos et al. (2001).
Figure 10.39. δ^13 C in fine (<25μm) carbonate (circles) and planktonic foraminifera from DSDP Site 528 in the South Atlantic. From d’Hondt (1998). Docsity.com
ature. The positive shifts in δ^18 O are indicative of global cooling, while the positive shift in δ^13 C sug- gests a increase in burial of organic carbon or a decrease in its erosion, either of which would have de- creased CO 2 in the ocean-atmosphere system and thereby contributed to the cooling. The final interesting feature is a roughly 1‰ decrease in δ^13 C in the late Miocene. This could result from either a decrease in organic carbon burial, an increase in organic carbon erosion, or an increase in volcanism. There is no evidence of the latter; furthermore, all of these should have resulted in an in- crease in atmospheric CO 2. However, there is independent evidence from boron isotopes, which we will consider in the follow chapter, and δ^13 C in alkenones from marine phytoplankton, which we’ll dis- cuss in the next section, that atmospheric CO 2 concentrations have been fairly stable at 200-300 ppm since the late Oligocene (this contrasts with much higher concentrations prior to 35 Ma). Derry and France-Lanord (1996) proposed this decrease reflects a decrease in the fractionation between organic and inorganic carbon due lower atmospheric CO 2 levels. As we found in Chapter 8, if plants should fix a greater proportion of the CO 2 in their cell interiors, as they might at low atmospheric CO 2 then net fractionation should decrease. Again, however, other evidence suggests that atmospheric CO 2 concen- tration was more or less constant through the Miocene.
Ice cores are able provide information on atmospheric CO 2 concentrations for nearly a million years. We would like to know, however, what role has atmospheric CO 2 concentrations played in climate variations in the Tertiary and earlier periods. This is important because of the need to predict the cli- matic consequences of increasing atmospheric CO 2 resulting from burning of fossil fuels. One method of determining paleo-CO 2 concentrations arises from an observed relationship between δ^13 Corg of marine phytoplankton and the concentration of dissolved inorganic CO 2 (Degens et al., 1968; Degens, 1969). We found in Chapter 8 that the fractionation of carbon isotopes during photosynthesis is related to CO 2 concentrations (Figure 8.1 7 ). The reason for this, in simple terms, is that when more CO 2 is available, plants are more selective and therefore show a greater preference for 12 C. Thus in principle at least, [CO2aq] can be estimated from measurements δ^13 Corg. Atmospheric CO 2 can then be calculated from the equilibrium between CO2aq and CO2g; that equilibrium depends on temperature, which must also be estimated. There are other complications, however, and variety of studies contributed to devel- oping a useful proxy for atmospheric CO 2 concentrations from δ^13 C of marine organic matter over the next few decades, including Rau (1994) and Jasper and Hayes (1994). These efforts culminated in the work of Pagani et al. (1999).