


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
TANSCHE Syllabus - PG IInd Year - Contemporary Literary Criticism Paper
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
ΙΙ. Μ.Α., Contemporary Literary Criticism: Unit V "The Deconstructive Angel" by M.Н. Abrams
"Deconstructive Angel" is an essay written by M. H. Abrams, a renowned literary critic. The essay was published in 1977 and offers a critique of deconstruction, a popular literary theory at the time. M.H. Abrams delivered "The Deconstructive Angel" as a presidential address to the Modern Language Association (MLA) in December 1976. In this speech M.H. Abrams shows his response to the growing influence of deconstructionist literary theory, particularly the ideas of thinkers like Jacques Derrida, Paul de Man, and J. Hillis Miller, which were gaining prominence in literary studies during that time. Abrams' Critique of Deconstruction In the 1970s, Deconstruction, became a major force in literary criticism, particularly in American academic circles. Deconstruction is a way of reading texts that questions traditional interpretations. It suggests that words and meanings are not fixed and can be understood in many ways. Abrams, who was a historian of literary criticism and a leading advocate of New Criticism, defended the idea that texts have stable meanings. Deconstruction, on the other hand, challenged these views by arguing that meaning is always shifting and never fully settled. "The Deconstructive Angel" directly challenges the idea that meaning is not stable in deconstruction. Abrams argues that deconstruction provides useful ideas about how language functions. However, he believes it can weaken literary criticism. This weakening happens because deconstruction denies the importance of what the author intended.
M. H. Abrams' is a New Critic. New Criticism is a type of literary theory that started in the early 20th century. It mainly developed in the United States and the UK. This method focuses on closely reading literary texts. New Criticism does not consider outside factors, such as the author's life, historical context, or the reader's response. It emphasizes the importance of the text itself. Millers views: In "The Deconstructive Angel," M.H. Abrams discusses the role of literary critic and theorist J. Hillis Miller, who was a prominent figure in the field of deconstruction. Miller helped popularize deconstruction in literary studies. His readings often focused on the instability of meaning in texts, which aligns with deconstructive principles. J. Hillis Miller's idea of pluralism in literary criticism means a text can have many meanings and interpretations, like that of I deconstruction. No single interpretation is the "right" one. He believes that a reader's background, experiences, and perspective shape how they understand a text. This means different readers can see the same work in different ways. Miller thinks that meaning is not fixed and can change depe… Deconstruction as an "Angel of Meaninglessness": Abrams compares deconstructionists, including Miller, to an "angel." This angel breaks apart meaning and coherence in texts. By focusing on how language is unstable, Abrams argues that Miller's approach removes the chance of finding any firm meaning in literature. The angel metaphor suggests that deconstruction does not help us understand texts. In the "Angel" Metaphor Abrams uses the idea of an angel to represent deconstruction. This "angel" swoops down on texts and tears them apart, looking for hidden meanings. Abrams thinks this "angel" is more
Abrams thinks deconstruction is often too negative because it breaks apart texts without giving anything constructive in return. He worries that by always doubting if language can have clear meaning, deconstruction could turn literary criticism into a way of tearing down literature instead of understanding it. The Reader's Role: Deconstruction focuses on the reader's role in creating meaning, but Abrams believes the reader's job is to uncover what the text is truly saying, not to invent new meanings. He believes that the reader can work towards a better understanding of a text's meaning by paying attention to language and structure of the text Why Does This Debate Matter? The debate between deconstruction and more traditional forms of literary criticism like Abrams' is important because it shapes how we think about literature, art, and even communication in general. If we believe that meaning is always shifting and uncertain, as deconstruction suggests, we might question whether it's even possible to understand literature or communicate effectively. On the other hand, if we believe, like Abrams, that meaning can be found with careful analysis, we approach reading with the goal of finding clarity and understanding the author's message. Conclusion: In "The Deconstructive Angel," Abrams agrees that deconstruction makes good points about how complex language can be. However, he believes it goes too far by saying that we can't find any meaning in texts. He thinks literary criticism should find a balance between recognizing language's complexity and the authors intended meaning.