



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An in-depth analysis of culture-bound syndromes, which are psychiatric and somatic symptoms that are considered diseases within specific societies or cultures. The inclusion of culture-bound syndromes in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (dsm) and international classification of diseases (icd-10), as well as common examples such as latah, amok, pibloktoq, susto, koro, and dhat. The document also explores the role of culture in shaping the meanings and expressions of various emotions, as well as the differences in symptom presentation across cultures.
Typology: Cheat Sheet
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Culture-specific syndrome or folk illness is a combination of psychiatric and somatic (body) symptoms that are considered to be a recognizable disease only within a specific society or culture. There are no objective structural or functional alterations of body organs or functions and the disease is not recognized in other cultures. The term culture-bound syndrome was included in the fourth version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Within the ICD-10 (Chapter V) framework culture-specific disorders are characterized by:
reevaluated within a particular cultural setting. A culture may interpret abnormal behavior as relating to some kind of voodoo or anger and may regard the symptoms as normal even though symptoms are consistent with schizophrenia. In the past, it was believed that culture-bound syndromes only occurred in the country or region of origin. However, with significant population movements and the tendency for immigrants to remain within their culture (though they have moved to a new country), culture-bound syndromes have been observed in other parts of the world. As with many culture-bound syndromes, there may be significant overlap with DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses. The study of culture-bound syndromes has gained respectability from the scholarly works of pioneers such as Yap who alleged that: It has long been known that there are, in certain cultural groups, peculiar aberrations of behavior which are regarded by them as abnormal. Over the years a number of terms taken from indigenous languages have crept into the psychiatric literature to denote these conditions, but many of them do not point to novel or distinct forms of disorder unknown elsewhere. Some are simply generic terms for “mental disorders” without definite meaning, others refer only to healing rituals, and still others to supernatural notions of disease causation. Some common culture-bound syndromes include the following: Latah: Originating from Malaysia and Indonesia, Latah refers to the exaggerated startle response followed by odd behaviors. The afflicted person typically responds to a frightening stimulus with an exaggerated startle or jump, sometimes throwing or dropping a held object, uttering some improper word, or matching the words or movements of people. The pattern is a highly stereotypic, culturally labeled state which, though contravening the social norm, is differentiated from insanity. Amok: Amok refers to the sudden mass assault taxon indigenous to Malayo- Indonesians, but may find parallel instances of indiscriminate homicide in other parts of the world. It is defined as “an acute outburst of unrestrained violence associated with homicidal attack, preceded by a period of brooding, and ending with exhaustion and amnesia” It is believed to have originated from the cultural training for warfare of the early Javanese and Malays which was intended to terrify the enemy into believing that they could expect no mercy and could save themselves only by flight.
There is a need to reconsider CBSs in the light of the available literature. Relabeling and inclusion of these manifestations in the mainstream diagnostic categories in the upcoming revisions of the diagnostic manual would pave way for a better understanding and management of these conditions.