Download Critical reflections on leadership – Narratives and leadership and more Study notes Business Management and Analysis in PDF only on Docsity!
Business Studies Notes 3
rd.
Year
Undergraduate / Graduate Level
SUBJECT: Critical
reflections on
leadership –
Narratives and
leadership
Authors: (Original Study Notes and Lecture Notes prepared by Mr. K.P. Saluja (M.B.A. from Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad), supported by Mr. K. K. Prasad (M.B.A from IGNOU Delhi) These notes are intended to be used by undergraduate students, completing Year 3 Business Degree Courses. These notes will help undergraduates and graduates complete case studies, coursework assignments and pass exams in Business Studies and Economics.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(1) Leadership – definition (2) Theories of leadership (3) Behavioural and style theories (4) Situational and contingency theories (5) Functional theory (6) Integrated psychological theory (7) Transactional and transformational theories (8) Emergence of leadership (9) Styles of leadership (10)Leadership differences affected by gender
Leadership - definition
Leadership, both as a research area and as a practical skill, incorporates the capacity of an individual, group or association to "lead” impact or guide others, groups, or whole associations. "Initiative" frequently gets seen as a challenged term. Expert writing discusses different perspectives on the idea, in some cases differentiating Eastern and Western ways to deal with authority, and furthermore (inside the West) North American versus European methodologies.
Similar to the Roman custom, the perspectives on Confucianism on 'right living' relate especially to the ideal of the (male) researcher pioneer and his big- hearted rule, buttressed by a practice of dutiful devotion." Initiative involves knowledge, reliability, altruism, boldness, and discipline ... Dependence on knowledge alone outcomes in disobedience. Exercise of compassion alone outcomes in shortcoming. Obsession with trust brings about indiscretion. Reliance on the strength of boldness brings about viciousness. Unnecessary discipline and harshness in order bring about savagery. At the point when one has every one of the five temperance together, each suitable to its capability, then one can be a pioneer. — Jia Lin, in editorial on Sun Tzu, Craft of War Machiavelli's The Sovereign, written in the mid sixteenth hundred years, gave a manual to rulers ("sovereigns" or "dictators" in Machiavelli's wording) to acquire and keep power. Proceeding the nineteenth century, the idea of initiative had less importance than today — society expected and got conventional yielding and compliance to rulers, lords, ace skilled workers and slave drivers. (Note that the Oxford English Word reference follows "administration" in English just as far back as 1821.) By and large, industrialization, resistance to the ancient system and the progressively getting rid of property servitude implied that a few recently creating associations (country state republics, business organizations) advanced a requirement for another worldview with which to portray chose lawmakers and occupation giving bosses - in this manner the turn of events and conjecturing of the possibility of "leadership". The useful connection among pioneers and supporters may remain, however satisfactory (maybe metaphorical) phrasing has changed. From the nineteenth century as well, the elaboration of revolutionary idea raised doubt about the entire idea of authority. One reaction to this forswearing of elitism accompanied Leninism - Lenin (1870-1924) requested a
élite gathering of restrained units to go about as the vanguard of a communist transformation, bringing into reality the fascism of the working class. Other verifiable perspectives on authority have tended to the appearing contrasts among mainstream and strict initiative. The regulations of Caesaropapism have repeated and had their doubters north of a few centuries. Christian reasoning on administration has frequently underlined stewardship of supernaturally given assets — human and material — and their sending as per a Heavenly arrangement. Analyse worker leadership. For a more broad view on administration in legislative issues, look at the idea of the statesperson.
Theories of leadership
Early Western history The quest for the qualities or characteristics of pioneers has gone on for a really long time. Philosophical compositions from Plato's Republic to Plutarch's Lives have investigated the inquiry "What characteristics recognize a person as a pioneer?" Hidden this search was the early acknowledgment of the significance of authority and the presumption that initiative is established in the qualities that specific people have. This thought that authority depends on individual credits is known as the "trait theory of leadership". Various works in the nineteenth hundred years - when the conventional power of rulers, masters and priests had started to melt away - investigated the characteristic hypothesis finally: note particularly the compositions of Thomas Carlyle and of Francis Galton, whose works have provoked many years of examination. In Legends and Legend Love (1841), Carlyle distinguished the abilities, abilities, and actual qualities of men who rose to drive. Galton's Genetic Virtuoso (1869) analysed authority characteristics in the groups of influential men. In the wake of showing that the quantities of famous family members dropped off when his center moved from first-degree to second-
New strategies and estimations were created after these persuasive surveys that would at last restore quality hypothesis as a feasible way to deal with the investigation of initiative. For instance, upgrades in specialists' utilization of the cooperative examination plan system permitted scientists to see that people would be able and do arise as pioneers across various circumstances and undertakings. Furthermore, during the 1980s factual advances permitted specialists to lead meta-examinations, in which they could quantitatively break down and sum up the discoveries from a wide exhibit of studies. This approach permitted characteristic scholars to make an exhaustive image of past initiative examination as opposed to depend on the subjective surveys of the past. Outfitted with new strategies, administration specialists uncovered the accompanying: Individuals can and do emerge as leaders across a variety of situations and tasks. Significant relationships exist between leadership emergence and such individual traits as: Intelligence Adjustment Extraversion Conscientiousness Openness to experience General self-efficacy While the trait theory of leadership has certainly regained popularity, its re- emergence has not been accompanied by a corresponding increase in sophisticated conceptual frameworks. Specifically, Zaccaro (2007) noted that trait theories still: Focus on a small set of individual attributes such as the "Big Five" personality traits, to the neglect of cognitive abilities, motives, values, social skills, expertise, and problem-solving skills. Fail to consider patterns or integrations of multiple attributes.
Do not distinguish between the leadership attributes that are generally not malleable over time and those that are shaped by, and bound to, situational influences. Do not consider how stable leader attributes account for the behavioural diversity necessary for effective leadership. Attribute pattern approach Taking into account the reactions of the characteristic hypothesis framed over, a few scientists have started to embrace an alternate point of view of pioneer individual contrasts — the pioneer trait design approach. As opposed to the conventional methodology, the pioneer property design approach depends on scholars' contentions that the impact of individual qualities on results is best perceived by considering the individual as a coordinated entirety instead of a summation of individual factors. All in all, the pioneer property design approach contends that coordinated star groupings or mixes of individual contrasts might make sense of significant difference in both pioneer rise and pioneer viability past that made sense of by single credits, or by added substance blends of different traits.
Behavioural and style theories
Because of the early reactions of the characteristic methodology, scholars started to investigate initiative as a bunch of ways of behaving, assessing the way of behaving of fruitful pioneers, deciding a conduct scientific classification, and recognizing expansive administration styles. David McClelland, for instance, set that authority takes areas of strength for an advanced positive self-image. To lead, fearlessness and high confidence are helpful, maybe even fundamental. Kurt Lewin, Ronald Lipitt, and Ralph White created in 1939 the fundamental work because of administration styles and execution. The scientists assessed the presentation of gatherings of eleven-year-old young men under various sorts of work environment. In each, the pioneer practiced his impact with
B. F. Skinner is the dad of surface level change in conduct and fostered the idea of uplifting feedback. Encouraging feedback happens when a positive upgrade is introduced in light of a way of behaving, improving the probability of that conducts from now on. Coming up next is an illustration of how encouraging feedback can be utilized in a business setting. Expect acclaim is a positive reinforce for a specific representative. This representative doesn't appear for work on time consistently. The supervisor chooses to applaud the representative for arriving as expected consistently the representative really appears for work on time. Thus, the representative comes to deal with time all the more frequently in light of the fact that the worker likes to be adulated. In this model, acclaim (the boost) is a positive reinforce for this representative on the grounds that the representative shows up working on time (the way of behaving) all the more regularly subsequent to being lauded for appearing for work on time. Encouraging feedback instituted by Skinner empowers a way of behaving to be rehashed in a positive way, and then again a negative reinforce is rehashed in a manner that isn't quite as conceivable as the positive. The utilization of encouraging feedback is a fruitful and developing procedure utilized by pioneers to persuade and achieve wanted ways of behaving from subordinates. Associations like Frito-Lay, 3M, Goodrich, Michigan Chime, and Emery Airship cargo have all pre-owned support to increment efficiency. Experimental exploration covering the most recent 20 years proposes that support hypothesis has a 17 percent increment in execution. Moreover, numerous support methods, for example, the utilization of recognition are reasonable, giving better execution to bring down costs.
Situational and contingency theories
Situational hypothesis likewise showed up as a response to the quality hypothesis of initiative. Social researchers contended that set of experiences was more than the consequence of mediation of incredible men as Carlyle recommended. Herbert Spencer (1884) (and Karl Marx) said that the times produce the individual and not the alternate way around. This hypothesis expects that various circumstances call for various qualities; as per this
gathering of speculations, no single ideal psychographic profile of a pioneer exists. As per the hypothesis, "what an individual really does while going about as a pioneer is by and large ward upon qualities of the circumstance in which he works. A few scholars began to integrate the quality and situational approaches. Expanding upon the examination of Lewin et al., scholastics started to standardize the enlightening models of authority environments, characterizing three administration styles and distinguishing which circumstances each style works better in. The dictator initiative style, for instance, is supported in times of emergency yet neglects to win the "hearts and psyches" of devotees in everyday administration; the popularity based authority style is more sufficient in circumstances that require agreement building; at last, the free enterprise authority style is valued for the level of opportunity it gives, however as the pioneers don't "assume responsibility", they can be seen as a disappointment in extended or prickly hierarchical problems. Thus, scholars characterized the style of administration as contingent to the circumstance, which is some of the time named possibility hypothesis. Three possibility authority speculations show up additional noticeably lately: Fiedler possibility model, Vroom-Yetton choice model, and the way objective hypothesis. The Fiedler possibility model puts together the pioneer's adequacy with respect to what Fred Fiedler called situational possibility. These outcomes from the collaboration of authority style and situational idealness (later called situational control). The hypothesis characterized two sorts of pioneer: the individuals who will generally achieve the errand by growing great associations with the gathering (relationship-situated), and the people who have as their superb concern completing the actual undertaking (task-arranged). As indicated by Fiedler, there is no optimal pioneer. Both errands arranged and relationship- situated pioneers can be successful in the event that their authority direction fits what is going on. At the point when there is a decent pioneer part connection, a profoundly organized undertaking, and high pioneer position power, the circumstance is viewed as a "good circumstance". Fiedler found that task-arranged pioneers are more viable in very great or horrible circumstances,
unit viability. This hypothesis contends that the pioneer's primary occupation is to see that whatever is important to bunch needs is dealt with; hence, a pioneer can be said to have taken care of their business competently when they have added to bunch viability and union (Fleishman et al., 1991; Hackman and Wageman, 2005; Hackman and Walton, 1986). While useful initiative hypothesis has most frequently been applied to group authority (Zaccaro, Rittman, and Imprints, 2001), it has additionally been actually applied to more extensive hierarchical administration also (Zaccaro, 2001). In summing up writing on useful authority (see Kozlowski et al. (1996), Zaccaro et al. (2001), Hackman and Walton (1986), Hackman and Wageman (2005), mortuary (2005), Klein, Zeigert, Knight, and Xiao (2006) noticed five wide capabilities a pioneer performs while advancing association's viability. These capabilities incorporate ecological observing, coordinating subordinate exercises, educating and training subordinates, rousing others, and mediating effectively in the gathering's work. An assortment of initiative ways of behaving are supposed to work with these capabilities. In beginning work distinguishing pioneer conduct, Fleishman (1953) saw that subordinates apparent their managers' conduct as far as two general classifications alluded to as thought and starting construction. Thought incorporates conduct associated with cultivating powerful connections. Instances of such way of behaving would remember showing worry for a subordinate or representing a steady way towards others. Starting design includes the activities of the pioneer zeroed in explicitly on task achievement. This could incorporate job explanation, setting execution guidelines, and considering subordinates responsible to those principles.
Integrated psychological theory
The Coordinated Mental Hypothesis of authority is an endeavor to incorporate the qualities of the more seasoned speculations (for example characteristics, conduct/styles, situational and utilitarian) while tending to their constraints, presenting another component - the requirement for pioneers to foster their administration presence, demeanour toward others and social adaptability by
rehearsing mental dominance. It likewise offers an establishment for pioneers needing to apply the ways of thinking of worker initiative and true authority. Coordinated mental hypothesis started to stand out after the distribution of James Scouller's Three Degrees of Authority model (2011). Scouller contended that the more established speculations offer just restricted help with fostering an individual's capacity to successfully lead. He brought up, for instance, that:
- Traits theories, which tend to reinforce the idea that leaders are born not made, might help us select leaders, but they are less useful for developing leaders.
- An ideal style (e.g. Blake & Mouton's team style) would not suit all circumstances.
- Most of the situational/contingency and functional theories assume that leaders can change their behavior to meet differing circumstances or widen their behavioural range at will, when in practice many find it hard to do so because of unconscious beliefs, fears or ingrained habits. Thus, he argued, leaders need to work on their inner psychology.
- None of the old theories successfully address the challenge of developing "leadership presence"; that certain "something" in leaders that commands attention, inspires people, wins their trust and makes followers want to work with them. Scouller proposed the Three Degrees of Leadership model, which was subsequently arranged as a "Coordinated Mental" hypothesis on the Businessballs website. Basically, his model expects to sum up what pioneers need to do, not exclusively to carry administration to their group or organization, yet in addition to foster themselves actually and mentally as leaders. The three levels in his model are public, private and personal leadership:
take cues from him to achieve a foreordained objective in return for something different. Power is given to the pioneer to assess, right, and train subordinates when efficiency now has nothing to do with the ideal level, and award adequacy when expected result is reached. Leader–member exchange theory Pioneer part trade (LMX) hypothesis tends to a particular part of the initiative interaction, which developed from a prior hypothesis called the upward dyad linkage (VDL) model. Both of these models center on the communication among pioneers and individual devotees. Like the value-based approach, this collaboration is seen as a fair trade by which the pioneer gives specific advantages like undertaking direction, exhortation, support, or potentially huge prizes and the devotees respond by giving the pioneer regard, participation, obligation to the errand and great execution. In any case, LMX perceives that pioneers and individual supporters will differ in the kind of trade that creates between them. LMX speculates that the kind of trades between the pioneer and explicit adherents can prompt the production of in-gatherings and out- gatherings. In-bunch individuals are said to have excellent trades with the pioneer, while out-bunch individuals have bad quality trades with the pioneer. In-group members In-group members are seen by the pioneer as being more capable, skilful, and ready to take on obligation than different supporters. The pioneer starts to depend on these people to assist with particularly testing assignments. Assuming that the devotee answers well, the pioneer rewards him/her with additional training, ideal work tasks, and formative encounters. On the off chance that the adherent shows high responsibility and exertion followed by extra rewards, the two players foster shared trust, impact, and backing of each other. Research shows the in-bunch individuals for the most part get better execution assessments from the pioneer, higher fulfilment, and quicker advancements than out-bunch individuals. In-bunch individuals are likewise
prone to construct more grounded bonds with their chiefs by having similar social foundations and interests. Out-group members Out-group members frequently get not so much time but rather more far off trades than their in-bunch partners. With out-group members, pioneers anticipate something like satisfactory work execution, great participation, sensible regard, and adherence to the expected set of responsibilities in return for a fair compensation and standard advantages. The pioneer invests less energy with out-bunch individuals, they have less formative encounters, and the pioneer will in general accentuate his/her proper position to acquire consistence to pioneer demands. Research shows that out-bunch individuals are less happy with their work and association, get lower execution assessments from the pioneer, consider their chief to be less fair, and are bound to document complaints or leave the association. Emotions Initiative can be seen as an especially feeling loaded process, with feelings laced with the social impact process. In an association, the pioneer's state of mind sometimes affects his/her gathering. These impacts can be portrayed in three levels
- The mood of individual group members. Group members with leaders in a positive mood experience more positive mood than do group members with leaders in a negative mood. The leaders transmit their moods to other group members through the mechanism of emotional contagion. Mood contagion may be one of the psychological mechanisms by which charismatic leaders influence followers.
- The affective tone of the group. Group affective tone represents the consistent or homogeneous affective reactions within a group. Group affective tone is an aggregate of the moods of the individual members of the group and
structure the premise of the view of administration by the larger part. It is notable by students of history that the maritime legend Master Nelson frequently composed his own variants of fights he was engaged with, so that when he got back in Britain, he would get a genuine legend's gladly received. In present day culture, the press, sites and different sources report their own perspectives on pioneers, which might be founded on the real world, however may likewise be founded on a political order, an instalment, or an inborn interest of the creator, media, or pioneer. Thusly, one can contend that the view of all pioneers is made and as a matter of fact doesn't mirror their actual initiative characteristics by any means. Subsequently the verifiable capability of faith in (for instance) regal blood as an intermediary for confidence in or examination of compelling overseeing abilities. Constructivist analysis Some constructivist’s question whether leadership exists, or suggest that (for example) leadership "is a myth equivalent to a belief in UFOs".
Emergence of leadership
Numerous character qualities were viewed as dependably connected with authority development. The rundown incorporates, however isn't restricted to (following rundown coordinated in sequential request): emphaticness, legitimacy, Enormous Five character factors, birth request, character qualities, strength, the capacity to understand anyone on a deeper level, orientation personality, knowledge, selfishness, self-viability for authority, self-checking and social inspiration. Different areas of concentrate according to how and why pioneers arise incorporate egotistical qualities, truant pioneers, and support. While there are numerous character qualities that be viewed as in deciding why a pioneer arises it means a lot to not check these in disengagement out. The present refined research techniques take a gander at character qualities in mix to decide examples of authority development.
Leadership emergence is the possibility that individuals brought into the world with explicit attributes become pioneers, and those without these qualities don't become pioneers. Individuals like Mahatma Gandhi, Abraham Lincoln, and Nelson Mandela all offer qualities that a typical individual doesn't. This incorporates individuals who decide to partake in positions of authority, rather than the people who don't. Research demonstrates that up to 30% of pioneer rise has a hereditary premise. There is no flow research demonstrating that there is an "initiative quality", rather we acquire specific characteristics that could impact our choice to look for authority. Both episodic and exact proof helps a steady connection between unambiguous characteristics and initiative way of behaving. Utilizing an enormous worldwide example specialists observed that there are three factors that inspire pioneers; full of feeling character (pleasure in driving), non-calculative (driving procures support), and social-regulating (awareness of certain expectations). Assertiveness The relationship between assertiveness and leadership emergence is curvilinear; individuals who are either low in assertiveness or very high in assertiveness are less likely to be identified as leaders. Authenticity Individuals who are more aware of their personality qualities, including their values and beliefs, and are less biased when processing self-relevant information, are more likely to be accepted as leaders. See authentic leadership. Big Five personality factors Those who emerge as leaders tend to be more (order in strength of relationship with leadership emergence): extroverted, conscientious, emotionally stable, and open to experience, although these tendencies are stronger in laboratory studies of leaderless groups. However, introversion – extroversion appears to
