Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Conservation Commission Meeting Minutes - March 27, 2017, Lecture notes of Construction

The minutes of a conservation commission meeting held on march 27, 2017. The meeting covered various topics including approval of minutes, request for determination of applicability, notices of intent, and other business. The main focus was on a proposal to rebuild a patio and landscaping at 5 melville walk, which involved discussions about the stability of the retaining wall, equipment access, and conditions for issuing a negative determination.

What you will learn

  • What was the outcome of the request for determination of applicability for the proposed work at 5 Melville Walk?
  • What was the discussion about the stability of the retaining wall during the Conservation Commission meeting?

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

juliant
juliant 🇬🇧

4.3

(12)

219 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Page 1 of 3
CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 27, 2017
Present: Scott McIsaac- Chair, Bob Mosher, Bob Hidell, Laurie Freeman, Loni Fournier- Conservation Officer
Absent: Adrienne DuBois, Paul Hall, John Morrissey
The meeting was called to order at 7:26 PM.
Approval of Minutes
Motion: Commissioner Freeman motioned to approve the minutes from the March 13, 2017 Commission meeting.
Second: Commissioner Hidell In Favor: All Opposed: None
Request for Determination of Applicability
5 Melville Walk
Applicant: Dawn Martel
Representative: John Cavanaro, Cavanaro Consulting, Inc.
Proposed: Patio rebuild & landscaping
The applicant is proposing to remove the existing 827sf brick patio and replace it with a new 908sf stone patio
containing an outdoor fireplace, kitchen, and island counter. The existing 140sf staircase will be replaced with a new,
reconfigured 195sf staircase. Most of the work is located in the 100ft buffer zone. A portion of the patio and walkway
improvements are located within the 50ft buffer zone. All of the hardscaping is located outside of the flood zone. New
plantings are proposed between the coastal beach and the patio. The plantings will be placed on both sides of an
existing retaining wall and along the northwestern property boundary, within the 50 and 100ft buffer zones. Those
plantings located on the side of the existing retaining wall, closest to the coastal beach, will be located within the flood
zone. The proposed plantings will be native coastal species.
Staff visited the site on 3/23/17. The proposed improvements will are located in an area that is maintained as patio and
lawn. The raised portion of the yard, between the house and the retaining wall is flat. The area between the retaining
wall and the coastal beach slopes towards the water. The retaining wall appears to be in good condition. The proposed
improvements should not impact the resource areas.
John Cavanaro (Cavanaro Consulting) and Sean Papich (Landscape Architect) were present to discuss the application.
Applicants Dawn, Tom and son, Spencer, Martel were present. Andrew Schlossberg and Hillary Plummer, of 2 Alice Walk,
were there in support of the project.
J. Cavanaro reviewed the project. One goal is to reconstruct the straight large stairway, bringing people down to the
reconfigured patio area and terrace. A second goal is to remove portions of lawn and replant these areas with native
seaside plants and shrubs. S. Papich described in further detail the proposed hardscaping (bluestone) and landscaping.
Commissioner Hidell asked how stable the retaining wall was. The applicants and S.Papich concurred that it was built in
2005 and was stable.
The Conservation Officer asked if the applicants had a plan for how they would get equipment to the site. D.Martel
replied that she had spoken to Frank Corrado, the contractor, who said that they would be able to bring in all the
equipment from the front of the house down along the side of the house. The C.O. included a condition that no
equipment, materials, or dumpsters are permitted on the lower part of the lawn, closest to the beach; that’s the most
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Conservation Commission Meeting Minutes - March 27, 2017 and more Lecture notes Construction in PDF only on Docsity!

CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES – March 27 , 201 7

Present: Scott McIsaac- Chair, Bob Mosher, Bob Hidell, Laurie Freeman, Loni Fournier- Conservation Officer Absent: Adrienne DuBois, Paul Hall, John Morrissey

The meeting was called to order at 7:26 PM.

Approval of Minutes Motion: Commissioner Freeman motioned to approve the minutes from the March 13, 2017 Commission meeting. Second: Commissioner Hidell In Favor: All Opposed: None

Request for Determination of Applicability 5 Melville Walk Applicant: Dawn Martel Representative: John Cavanaro, Cavanaro Consulting, Inc. Proposed: Patio rebuild & landscaping

The applicant is proposing to remove the existing 827sf brick patio and replace it with a new 908sf stone patio containing an outdoor fireplace, kitchen, and island counter. The existing 140sf staircase will be replaced with a new, reconfigured 195sf staircase. Most of the work is located in the 100ft buffer zone. A portion of the patio and walkway improvements are located within the 50ft buffer zone. All of the hardscaping is located outside of the flood zone. New plantings are proposed between the coastal beach and the patio. The plantings will be placed on both sides of an existing retaining wall and along the northwestern property boundary, within the 50 and 100ft buffer zones. Those plantings located on the side of the existing retaining wall, closest to the coastal beach, will be located within the flood zone. The proposed plantings will be native coastal species.

Staff visited the site on 3/23/17. The proposed improvements will are located in an area that is maintained as patio and lawn. The raised portion of the yard, between the house and the retaining wall is flat. The area between the retaining wall and the coastal beach slopes towards the water. The retaining wall appears to be in good condition. The proposed improvements should not impact the resource areas.

John Cavanaro (Cavanaro Consulting) and Sean Papich (Landscape Architect) were present to discuss the application. Applicants Dawn, Tom and son, Spencer, Martel were present. Andrew Schlossberg and Hillary Plummer, of 2 Alice Walk, were there in support of the project. J. Cavanaro reviewed the project. One goal is to reconstruct the straight large stairway, bringing people down to the reconfigured patio area and terrace. A second goal is to remove portions of lawn and replant these areas with native seaside plants and shrubs. S. Papich described in further detail the proposed hardscaping (bluestone) and landscaping. Commissioner Hidell asked how stable the retaining wall was. The applicants and S.Papich concurred that it was built in 2005 and was stable.

The Conservation Officer asked if the applicants had a plan for how they would get equipment to the site. D.Martel replied that she had spoken to Frank Corrado, the contractor, who said that they would be able to bring in all the equipment from the front of the house down along the side of the house. The C.O. included a condition that no equipment, materials, or dumpsters are permitted on the lower part of the lawn, closest to the beach; that’s the most

fragile area of the property and it could be a tempting storage or setup area. The Commission agreed that the proposed project, with conditions, could be issued a negative determination. Motion: Commissioner Freeman motioned to issue a Negative Determination for the proposed work at 5 Melville Walk and adopt the findings of fact a and b, and conditions 1 through 5 of the staff report.

Findings: a. The project meets the requirements of Part 1, Section 7.1 of the Town of Hingham Wetland Regulations governing procedures for a Request for Determination of Applicability. b. The work described is within an area subject to protection under the Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. c. 131, §

  1. and the Town of Hingham Wetland Regulations, and will not alter or adversely affect the area subject to protection under the Act or the Regulations. Conditions:
  1. During all phases of construction, all disturbed or exposed areas shall be brought to a finished grade and either a) loamed and seeded for permanent stabilization, or b) stabilized in another way approved by the Commission.
  2. There shall be no stockpiling of soil or other materials within 50 feet of the resource area.
  3. Any on site dumpsters shall not be located within 50 feet of any resource area.
  4. Any debris that falls into the resource area shall be removed immediately by hand.
  5. The Conservation Department shall be notified of any changes in plans prior to proceeding with said changed plans. Second: Commissioner Mosher In Favor: All Opposed: None

Notices of Intent 171 Otis Street – DEP 034-1282, continued from 1/9/ Applicant: Gary Jacobson Representative: David Ray Proposed: Reconfiguration of existing pier & floating docks

Since the last meeting, staff discussed the possibility of a peer review consultant with the Commission and the representative. The applicant decided not to pursue a peer review and will instead revise the plans. The applicant requested to continue to 4/24/17.

2 Planter’s Field Lane – DEP 034-1284, continued to 4/10/ Applicant: Feeley Realty Trust Representative: Mark Manganello Proposed: Subdivision

The Conservation Officer explained that the applicant was offering a site visit for the Commission and the public on 4/1/17. The applicant would like the Commission to see the site before they return with revised plans. The C.O. has plans that were submitted on March 17, 2017 which have been commented on by the Peer Reviewer, Paul Brogna. The C.O. reviewed and answered a few questions regarding the plans and the ‘cart path.’ Commissioner Freeman asked about the wetland values and the C.O. explained that they are fairly extensive and also have connectivity to the Hingham Harbor.

Other Business

  1. Proposed site walk at 2 Planter’s Field Lane, 4/1 @ 9:45 am
  2. Renewal of Cushing and Schultz fields license agreements The Conservation Officer explained that John Hornstra’s license agreements for the agricultural use of Cushing and Shultz fields have expired. The C.O. worked with Town Counsel and has new 3 year license agreements reviewed and signed by J.Hornstra available for the Commission to review and sign if it sees fit; these would take effect April 1, 2017. The previous agreements were for 5 years but Town Counsel advised that it was more standard practice to have a 3 year contract. J.Hornstra has evaluated the soil at both fields; Shultz field needs amendments (wood ash) in order to correct the ph levels and Cushing field is